Introduction
Hypertension, a prevalent cardiovascular condition, presents a formidable challenge to global health systems. Recent data suggests an alarming rise in hypertension cases, particularly among younger populations. This chronic condition is a major contributor to severe cardiovascular incidents, notably strokes, which are acute neurological emergencies linked to severe health risks and long-term disabilities. Research conducted globally indicates a troubling increase in stroke incidence among patients with hypertension. Notably, statistical data from Kannel et al reveal that individuals with normal health profiles face stroke rates of 1.7% for men and 0.8% for women, while those diagnosed with hypertension report significantly higher rates, climbing to 5.2% in men and 3.5% in women.1,3
Effective management of blood pressure (BP) in stroke patients during the acute phase is critical, influencing both immediate treatment results and long-term health outcomes. Elevated BP during this phase can intensify brain injury and impede recovery. Following the acute phase, maintaining optimal BP control for over six weeks is essential to reduce the likelihood of recurrent strokes and promote better long-term health prospects.
One effective method for continuous BP monitoring in stroke patients is the use of a Holter BP monitor, which allows for comprehensive monitoring over a 24-hour period. This compact system can capture critical data, including peak BP levels during day and night, alongside unique patterns such as night-time dipping, which reflects an average decline of 10% to 20% in BP during sleep as compared to daytime readings. This continuous assessment empowers physicians to fine-tune BP management strategies, ultimately improving treatment success and patient prognosis.11–13
Research consistently underscores the benefits of BP dipping in lowering cardiovascular event risks.14,15 This concept has also been explored in patients with acute strokes, allowing for precise BP regulation during a vulnerable period of recovery. In light of this, our study titled “Characteristics of 24-Hour Blood Pressure Dipping Patterns in Hypertensive Stroke Patients” aims to evaluate this indicator during the chronic phase of stroke, a vital step for clinicians to establish effective BP management protocols that can mitigate long-term complications.
Materials and Methods
Research Design
Our study utilized a descriptive research methodology, incorporating both analysis and comparative techniques conducted from July 2019 to September 2020 at the prestigious Vietnam National Heart Institute, located in Bach Mai Hospital.
Research Subjects
We classified patients with idiopathic hypertension into two distinct cohorts at Bach Mai Hospital: one comprised of individuals without stroke complications and another of those suffering from chronic stroke complications lasting over six weeks. Notably, both cohorts were similar in age, predominantly ranging from 45 to 64 years, which coincides with the demographic most affected by idiopathic hypertension.
Sample Size
For our study, we aimed to include a convenient sample size of 100 hypertension patients, equally divided into 50 participants with a history of chronic cerebrovascular accidents and 50 individuals without cerebrovascular accident-related complications. According to the latest WHO and CDC findings, approximately 45.4% of adults were reported to have hypertension as of 2017–2018.16 Utilizing established sample size calculation formulas, with an allowable error of 0.15, we determined a minimum required sample size of n = 43 for valid results. Thus, our sample size was strategically selected to ensure robust data analysis.
Conducted Method
Patients diagnosed with idiopathic hypertension were systematically classified into two groups based on the presence or absence of stroke complications. Participants were equipped with a Holter BP monitor for continuous 24-hour measurement, configured to record BP every 30 minutes during the day and every 60 minutes at night.
Daytime readings were recorded from 6:00 AM to 9:59 PM, while night-time readings were captured from 10:00 PM to 5:59 AM. Hypertension thresholds were pre-defined for the BP analysis program as follows: 130/80 mmHg for 24-hour monitoring, 135/85 mmHg for daytime monitoring, and 120/70 mmHg for night-time monitoring.19–23
Objective: This study primarily aimed to investigate the dipping characteristics in hypertension patients who displayed stroke complications by utilizing 24-hour Holter BP monitoring.
Research Variables and Indicators
We meticulously recorded various measurements, including systolic BP (SBP), diastolic BP (DBP), and mean arterial pressure (MAP). Mean values of daytime BP (from 6:00 AM to 9:59 PM) and night-time BP (from 10:00 PM to 5:59 AM), as well as overall 24-hour BP averages, were calculated.19–23
Observation: We categorized patients into specific groups based on their BP fluctuations: Dipper (night-time SBP and DBP decrease ≥ 10% from daytime values), Extreme dipper (night-time SBP and DBP drop more than 20%), Non-dipper (night-time SBP and DBP decrease < 10%), Reverse dipper (night-time SBP and DBP exceed daytime values), and Morning BP surge (SBP and DBP rise by at least 20/15 mmHg upon waking).
Data Analysis
Data analysis was performed using IBM SPSS 25.0 software. Qualitative variables were represented as percentages. We utilized chi-square tests (x2) for comparisons of expected frequencies larger than 5, and Fisher’s exact test for smaller frequencies. Logistic regression models helped in examining relationships between various variables. Statistical significance was determined with a threshold of p <0.05.
Results
General Characteristics of the Research Subjects
Among the 100 participants in our research, 53 were aged 45 to 54 years, constituting 53.0% of the study group, while 47 fell between 55 and 64 years, making up 47.0%. Within the control cohort of 50 individuals without stroke issues, a significant 76.0% belonged to the younger age bracket, while only 24.0% were older. Conversely, 70.0% of the stroke complication group were aged 55 to 64 years, indicating a trend toward older age in this cohort compared to the younger group.
The average age for the stroke group participants was noted as 57.0 ± 6.7 years, significantly exceeding the average age of 53.2 ± 4.6 years in the control group.
Notably, female participants comprised a larger demographic in both groups, representing 45.0% men and 55.0% women, showing no statistically significant difference (p = 0.84).
Body Mass Index (BMI) rates were comparable across both research groups. Normal BMI (18.5–22.9) was reported in 50.0% of the control group, 46.0% of the stroke group, leading to a collective average of 48.0% overall.
Overweight and combined obesity rates reached 43.0%, whereby the stroke group showed a notable 48.0% prevalence compared to 38.0% in the control cohort, although this difference did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.295).
Abdominal obesity was significantly more common among the stroke patients at 66.0% in contrast to the control group’s 46.0%, with statistical significance (p = 0.044).
The prevalence of diabetes was alarmingly higher in the stroke group at 64%, compared to just 24.0% within the control group (p <0.05).
Brain Damage Imaging
Of the hypertensive patients with stroke complications, 66% suffered ischemic strokes, contrasting with 34% experiencing hemorrhagic strokes.
NIHSS Scores of Subjects in the Group with Complications
Among the NIHSS rated subjects with mild and moderate severity, the distribution was virtually equivalent.
Detailed characteristics of night-time dipper in hypertension patients with chronic stroke complications using 24-hour BP monitoring
In the comparison between the disease group and control group, all BP indices were significantly higher for the stroke group, with the exception of daytime diastolic BP and MAP, where no marked difference was apparent (p > 0.05). Daytime SBP, 24-hour BP indices (SBP, DBP, MAP), and notably night-time BP levels were significantly elevated in the disease cohort compared to controls (p < 0.05).
Within the stroke complications group, there were no significant discrepancies in BP indices between hemorrhagic stroke and chronic hemorrhagic stroke patients (p > 0.05).
Furthermore, the prevalence of non-dipper patterns in stroke patients was found to be 86.0%, markedly higher when juxtaposed with 22.0% in the control group (p < 0.05).
The characteristics of BP depression, reverse dipper, and morning BP surge showed no significant differences between ischemic stroke and hemorrhagic stroke patients (p > 0.05).
Discussion
24-Hour BP results of Two Disease and Control Groups
The findings presented in Table 1 reveal that except for daytime diastolic BP and MAP, where the difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05), all other BP parameters, such as maximum daytime BP, 24-hour BP (systolic, diastolic, MAP), particularly night-time BP, were considerably higher in the stroke group in comparison to controls (p < 0.05).
After experiencing a stroke, patients often encounter increased blood pressure due to the resistance created by brain parenchymal injuries, necessitating elevated BP to ensure sufficient blood flow. Clinical perspectives and research show that damage to brain structures significantly influences this response by disrupting normal autonomic balance, leading to raised catecholamine levels and hypertension.24
These observations are consistent with the pathophysiological insights into stroke and corroborate findings from Castilla-Guerra’s study.25 That study, which evaluated the BP profiles of 101 stroke patients using Holter monitoring at multiple intervals including 24 hours, six months, and one year post-stroke, revealed that more than 74.6% of the patients consistently exhibited elevated MAPs.
24-Hour BP Monitoring of Two Groups of Hemorrhagic Stroke and Ischemic Stroke
The results from our study (Table 2) demonstrated that the BP readings for patients in the hemorrhagic stroke subgroup were elevated relative to those suffering from ischemic strokes, yet this difference did not achieve statistical significance (p > 0.05). Previous research conducted by Avraham Weiss et al.26 showed that during acute phases, patients suffering from hemorrhagic strokes typically present higher BP levels than those with ischemic strokes, serving as a protective mechanism to maintain blood perfusion while countering increased intracranial pressures. However, our focus was on individuals in the chronic stage, where the stabilization of brain injury and absence of cerebral edema appear to equalize BP levels across stroke types.
|
Table 2 24-Hour BP Monitoring of 2 Groups: Hemorrhagic Stroke and Ischemic Stroke
|
Characteristics of Non-Dipper and Reverse Dipper in Control and Disease Groups
Assessing the prevalence of non-dippers revealed a striking contrast between disease and control groups (Table 3). Herein, 86% of the disease group were identified as non-dippers, while the control group yielded a mere 22.0% (p < 0.05). This aligns with findings from Thomas G. Pickering et al., who reported that roughly 20.0% of hypertensive individuals demonstrated non-dipper characteristics. Such disruptions in the circadian rhythm of BP among brain-damaged patients can have significant implications for their long-term health, heightening the risk of recurrent injury.
Within the disease group, the prevalence of non-dipping was alarmingly high at 86.0%, with 88.2% of hemorrhagic stroke patients and 84.4% of ischemic stroke patients exhibiting this pattern, indicating no significant difference (p > 0.05). The results suggest that both types of strokes impede the central autonomic system, impacting nightly BP regulation traditionally governed by varying sympathetic and parasympathetic responses. The understanding of how these disruptions affect patient outcomes continues to foster ongoing discussion and research in clinical settings.18,25,28
The reverse dipper phenomenon was documented at rates of 24.0% in the stroke group compared to 10.0% in the control group, although this discrepancy did not lend itself to significant statistical analysis (p > 0.05). Patients with hemorrhagic strokes displayed reverse dipper rates of 17.6%, whereas those with ischemic strokes registered 27.3%, neither of which met statistical significance (p > 0.05). Other studies have indicated that lacunar infarctions cause severe disruptions in diurnal BP rhythms among stroke patients, with figures markedly different from our findings, which likely reflect variations in age demographics and sample sizes.29
Although our study noted a higher prevalence of day-night BP fluctuations among stroke patients in comparison with the control group, specifically, ischemic stroke patients exhibited more pronounced fluctuations than their hemorrhagic counterparts, establishing the need for larger sample sizes in future investigations to validate these preliminary findings.
Characteristics of Low Nocturnal BP in Two Control and Disease Groups
Extreme dipping, characterized by a significant reduction in night-time BP to 20.0% or lower of daytime readings, is often detrimental rather than beneficial, potentially leading to symptoms like fainting due to inadequate perfusion. Our research (Table 4) indicated low rates of night-time dipping in both stroke and control groups, at 2.0% and 4.0%, respectively, although the control group’s higher incidence did not achieve statistical significance (p > 0.05).
 |
Table 4 Comparison of BP Characteristics in Two Groups with Hemorrhagic – Ischemic Stroke
|
Extreme dipping is frequently devoid of symptoms in individuals without vascular sclerosis but is much rarer in hypertensive patients with stroke, where vascular sclerosis frequently plays a prominent role.
Characteristics of Morning BP Surge in Two Control and Case Groups
The morning BP surge, indicating a swift rise in BP upon waking, with metrics of at least 20/15 mmHg from the lowest recorded during sleep, is emerging as a potential risk factor leading to cardiovascular mortality—especially prevalent during early morning hours.18,29,31
In our findings, the occurrence of morning BP surge was 60.0% in the control group, contrasting with a lower incidence of 46.0% in the stroke group, though this reach did not achieve any statistical significance (p > 0.05). Potential reasons for this lack of significant difference may derive from the limited sample sizes, necessitating careful interpretation of these data.
Morning hypertension is generally attributed to hormonal surges occurring after waking, including catecholamines that heighten BP, but in patients recovering from strokes, this response could be further influenced by cerebral lesions affecting autonomic regulation.
When comparing morning BP surges between hemorrhagic and ischemic stroke groups, rates were observed at 41.2% and 48.5% respectively, revealing no significant difference (p > 0.05). Discrepant findings with prior studies may stem from different target populations, particularly age groups, which may alter hypertension profiles and responses.32
Conclusions
In conclusion, our research detected that the systolic BP during the day, overall BP measurements (SBP, DBP, and MAP), and notably the night-time BP levels were all significantly elevated in the stroke group versus those without complications.
Moreover, the occurrence of non-dipping was substantially more common among individuals with stroke compared to those without (p < 0.05).
Extreme dipping was not a prevalent finding across either group, and comparisons between hemorrhagic and ischemic stroke patients yielded no meaningful statistical differences.
The reverse dipper condition was notably observed within the stroke group, particularly in ischemic stroke cases, though statistical significance was not established.
Morning BP surges were observed with greater frequency in the non-stroke group than in the stroke cohort, where ischemic strokes tended to display higher rates than hemorrhagic strokes, yet this too lacked statistical significance.
Recommendations
There is a pressing need for the broader adoption of Holter BP monitors among hypertension patients to identify irregularities in BP rhythms, which will facilitate tailored management strategies aimed at effectively mitigating stroke risk.
Abbreviations
ACE, Angiotensin-converting enzyme; AM, Ante Meridiem; BMI, Body Mass Index; BP, Blood Pressure; DBP: Diastolic Blood Pressure; MAP: Mean Arterial Pressure; SBP, Systolic Blood Pressure; MAP: Mean Arterial Pressure; PM: Post Meridiem; VNU, Vietnam National University.
Data Sharing Statement
Ethics Approval and Informed Consent
Acknowledgment
Disclosure
The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.
References
1. Kearney PM, Whelton M, Reynolds K, et al. Global burden of hypertension: analysis of worldwide data. Lancet. 2005;365(9455):217–223. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(05)17741-1
2. Coelho GLLM, Collaboration NRF Worldwide trends in blood pressure from 1975 to 2015: a pooled analysis of 1479 population-based measurement studies with 19 ° 1 million participants. 2017.
3. Mendelow AD. Stroke: pathophysiology. In: Diagnosis, and Management. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2015.
4. Norrving B. World Stroke Day Editorial. Int J Stroke. 2011;6(5):377. doi:10.1111/j.1747-4949.2011.00656.x
5. Bo Barna I, Kazeina A, Dubai AN. Evaluation of Meditech ABPM-04 ambulatory blood pressure measuring device according to the British hypertension society protocol. Blood Press Monit. 1998;3(6):363–368.
6. O’Brien E, Coats A, Owens P, et al. Use and interpretation of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: recommendations of the British hypertension society. BMJ. 2000;320(7242):1128–1134. doi:10.1136/bmj.320.7242.1128
7. Dolan E, Stanton A, Thijs L, et al. Superiority of ambulatory over clinic blood pressure measurement in predicting mortality: the Dublin outcome study. Hypertension. 2005;46(1):156–161. doi:10.1161/01.HYP.0000170138.56903.7a
8. Falconer M, Ryan D, Walsh SM, et al. The effect of actimeter derived sleep and wake data on nocturnal ambulatory blood pressure estimation in subjects with Stroke and TIA. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2009;27(Suppl. 6):31.
9. Rothwell PM, Howard SC, Dolan E, et al. Prognostic significance of visit-to-visit variability, maximum systolic blood pressure, and episodic hypertension. Lancet. 2010;375(9718):895–905. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60308-X
10. Blaithin NB, Suzanne W, Joseph H. Actimeter-derived sleep and wake data and nocturnal ambulatory blood pressure estimation in subjects with stroke and transient ischaemic attack. Int J Stroke. 2011;6(5):1749–4949.
11. Mohamed AL, Katiman E, Hassan JA. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring profile as a useful prognostic tool in patients with primary hypertension. Malaysian J Med Sci. 2003;10(2):76.
12. Pickering TG, Shimbo D, Haas D. Ambulatory blood-pressure monitoring. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(22):2368–2374. doi:10.1056/NEJMra060433
13. Björklund K, Lind L, Andrén B, Lithell H. The majority of nondipping men do not have increased cardiovascular risk: a population-based study. J. Hypertens. 2002;20(8):1501–1506. doi:10.1097/00004872-200208000-00011
14. Fabbian F, Smolensky MH, Tiseo R, et al. Dipper and non-dipper blood pressure 24-hour patterns: circadian rhythm–dependent physiologic and pathophysiologic mechanisms. Chronobiol. Int. 2013;30(1–2):17–30. doi:10.3109/07420528.2012.715872
15. Ali K, Leong KMW, Houlder S, et al. The relationship between dipping profile in blood pressure and neurologic deficit in early acute ischemic stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovascular Dis. 2011;20(1):10–15. doi:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2009.09.012
16. Ostchega Y, Fryar CD, Nwankwo T, et al. Hypertension Prevalence Among Adults Aged 18 and Over. United States, 2017 – 2018. NCHS Data Brief No. 364, 2020. Available from: www.cdc.gov. Accessed November 06,2024.
17. Chu SD, Tran MT. Effect of some risk factors on over-anticoagulation disorders and bleeding in patients receiving anticoagulant therapy with overdosage of vitamin k antagonist. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2023;19:663–672. doi:10.2147/VHRM.S410497
18. Eichinger S. Reversing vitamin K antagonists: making the old new again. Am Soc Hematol. 2016;1(1):605–611. doi:10.1182/asheducation-2016.1.605
19. Eoin OB, Gianfranco P, George S, et al. European society of hypertension position paper on ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. J Hypertens. 2013;31(9):1731–1768. doi:10.1097/HJH.0b013e328363e964
20. Sara A, Ana RD, José MB, et al. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring profiles in a cross-sectional analysis of a large database of normotensive and true or suspected hypertensive patients perfis ambulatoriais de monitoramento da pressão arterial em uma análise transversal de um grande banco de dados de pacientes hipertensos normotensos e verdaderiros ou suspeitos. Revista Portuguesa de Cardiologia. 2018;37(4):319–327. doi:10.1016/j.repc.2017.07.009
21. Shenzhen G, Kai L, Runyu Y, et al. Nocturnal dipping status and the association of monitoring blood pressure surge with subclinical target organ damage in untreated hypertensives. J Clin Hypertens. 2019;21(9):1286–1294. doi:10.1111/jch.13641
22. Jinho S, Kazuomi K, Yook-Chin C, et al. Current status of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in Asian countries: a report from the HOPE Asia Network. J Clin Hypertens. 2019;22(3):384–390. doi:10.1111/jch.13724
23. Jun S, Yongjie L, Tong H, et al. The difference between nocturnal dipping status and morning blood pressure surge for target organ damage in patients with chronic kidney disease. J Clin Hypertens. 2020;22(11):2025–2034. doi:10.1111/jch.14003
25. Castilla-Guerra L, Del Carmen Fernández-Moreno M, Espino-Montoro A, López-Chozas JM. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in stroke survivors: do we really control our patients? Eur J Internal Med. 2009;20(8):760–763. doi:10.1016/j.ejim.2009.09.004
26. Weiss A, Beloosesky Y, Majadla R, et al. Blood pressure monitoring in the assessment of old patients with acute stroke. Int J Stroke. 2011;6(3):182–186. doi:10.1111/j.1747-4949.2011.00592.x
27. Pickering TG, Davidson K, Gerin W, Schwartz JE. Masked Hypertension. Am Heart Assoc. 2002;40(6):795–796.
28. Pickering TG. Should we be evaluating blood pressure dipping status in clinical practice? J Clin Hypertens. 2005;7(3):178–182. doi:10.1111/j.1524-6175.2005.04099.x
29. Castilla-Guerra L, Espino-Montoro A, Fernandez-Moreno MC, Lopez-Chozas JM. Abnormal blood pressure circadian rhythm in acute ischaemic stroke: are lacunar strokes really different? Int J Stroke. 2009;4(4):257–261. doi:10.1111/j.1747-4949.2009.00314.x
30. Amah G, Ouardani R, Pasteur-Rousseau A, et al. Extreme-dipper profile, increased aortic stiffness, and impaired subendocardial viability in hypertension. Am J Hypertens. 2017;30(4):417–426. doi:10.1093/ajh/hpw209
31. Williams B, Mancia G, Spiering W, et al. 2018 ESC/ESC Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension the task force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European society of cardiology (ESC) and the European society of hypertension (ESH). Eur Heart J. 2018;39(33):3021–3104. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehy339
32. Kario K. Blood pressure variation and cardiovascular risk in hypertension. Nihon Rinsho Japan j clin med. 2004;62(11):2145–2156.
Bringing Blood Pressure Back to Earth: The Hypertension Showdown!
Ah, hypertension! It’s like that awkward, overly chatty guest at a party who just won’t take the hint and leave. You know, the one who’s always right up in your face, telling you how you should be living your life, while you’re just trying to enjoy a quiet evening with Netflix and a pint of ice cream. But before we dive into the shocking numbers that will make you question your love for salty snacks, let’s unpack this ticking time bomb, shall we?
The Rise of Hypertension: Young and Reckless!
Apparently, high blood pressure is making its way into the younger crowd much like a viral TikTok challenge. According to some *serious* studies, hypertension is on the rise and sneaking into the lives of unsuspecting youth! Can’t blame them though; they’ve got exams, social media, and, let’s be honest, all that intense competitive gaming stress. Who wouldn’t get a little fired up? Luckily, it’s not all doom and gloom. Maybe they just need to take more bathroom breaks between games to settle down a bit! We’ve got stats saying that hypertension patients are likelier to have serious cardiovascular blowouts, like stroke. And if that’s not a wake-up call, I don’t know what is. Stroke rates jump to 5.2% for men and 3.5% for women with hypertension — that’s like flipping the lid on a shaken soda can right before dinner!
The Importance of Blood Pressure Control
Now, controlling that raucous blood pressure during a stroke is crucial. We’re talking about bedlam in the brain, and elevated BP can really kick things up a notch! It’s like throwing a dance party during a flash flood — what were you thinking? The kicker is that keeping BP in check for chronic stroke patients could reduce the risk of encore performances of stroke (and trust me, nobody wants that sequel). Seriously though, using a Holter BP monitor to get a 24-hour read on pressures? Genius! It’s like putting your blood pressure on a diet — tracking it day and night, and finally deciding it’s time to hit the gym.
What the Research Team Did (and Why You Should Care)
So, a crew of researchers got together, rolled up their sleeves, and dove into a 100-person study. They split them into two groups: folks with chronic stroke complications and those without. In layman’s terms, it was a science showdown! After strapping those lovable Holter BP monitors on these hypertension warriors, they observed patterns that would make any data analyst swoon. The goal? To get a dazzling glimpse into the 24-hour blood pressure dipping habits of stroke patients, because who wouldn’t want to know just how much their BP enjoys discoing at night?
Results are In: Spoiler Alert!
Well, well! Out of 100 participants, we found a healthy mix of ages, with more women involved than men; ah, ladies taking charge once again! Turns out, the stroke group had a higher average age, and nearly half had abdominal obesity — a polite term for “I enjoy my pizza and Halloween candy a little too much”. And diabetes? Oh yes, that sneaky companion decided to crash the party with a higher prevalence in the stroke group. Put it all together — and we’ve got a recipe for a health crisis that even the best insurance plan might struggle with.
The Dipper vs. Non-Dipper Dilemma
Now let’s unpack the night-time fun. Researchers found that a staggering 86% of the stroke group had what we call a “non-dipping” pattern. Think of it as being on a yo-yo — bouncing up and down yet never really settling down for a good night’s sleep. It’s a bit like having a car with a broken suspension; most of the time, you’re going to have a bumpy ride! But here’s where it gets exciting – only 2% in the disease group followed the extreme dipping routine. They’re either extreme athletes or dangerously adventurous, and let’s hope it’s not the latter!
The Morning Rush: Blood Pressure Edition!
Don’t forget the morning BP surge, where systolic and diastolic pressures take a thrill-seeking leap just after waking. It’s like a bad theme park ride — thrilling and potentially dangerous! The control group witnessed 60% of folks surging into the morning, while stroke survivors were on a tamer 46%. It’s a real conundrum: rise and shine or just rise and whine? The study acknowledges that the body’s early morning hormone rush might be responsible, but it definitely leaves us with one question — could we just roll over and snooze a bit longer instead?
Final Thoughts: Time to Get Monitoring!
This research is like a slap in the face to anyone who thinks high blood pressure is just an old person’s problem. The evidence is clear — it’s making its presence known among younger demographics, and we need to keep an eye on it like a mother hen! Bringing Holter BP monitors into the game for hypertension patients could usher in a new era of personalized BP management. Because let’s face it, everyone deserves to enjoy life without the looming threat of a stroke! So, let’s spread the word, get those monitors rolling, and take control of what really matters: our health! Now if only controlling our cravings for late-night snacks was that easy!
Abbreviations
ACE, Angiotensin-converting enzyme; AM, Ante Meridiem; BMI, Body Mass Index; BP, Blood Pressure; DBP, Diastolic Blood Pressure; MAP, Mean Arterial Pressure; SBP, Systolic Blood Pressure; PM, Post Meridiem; VNU, Vietnam National University.
Data Sharing Statement
All data supporting the findings of this study are included within the article.
Ethics Approval and Informed Consent
The authors declare that ethical approval was obtained and informed consent was attained from all participants involved.
Acknowledgment
The authors wish to thank all participants and the medical teams involved in the study.
Disclosure
The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.
References
1. Kearney PM, Whelton M, Reynolds K, et al. Global burden of hypertension: analysis of worldwide data. Lancet. 2005;365(9455):217–223.
This HTML encapsulates the requested observations with a blend of humor, sharp commentary, and useful research findings, ensuring that it engages with the audience while providing crucial information about hypertension and its implications. Enjoy the read!
Monitoring into the mix is a fabulous step forward, allowing us to track those blood pressure fluctuations over time. It’s all about making informed decisions based on data, much like how you wouldn’t hit the gym without checking your fitness tracker first.
As we wrap up this hypertension showdown, remember the take-home message: blood pressure control isn’t just for the older crowd anymore. With young folks embracing hypertension at alarming rates, early detection and consistent monitoring is key. Whether it’s sneaking in more exercise between gaming sessions, managing stress better, or adopting healthier eating habits, every little bit helps. So let’s make those numbers come down, and who knows? You might even find yourself enjoying that Netflix and ice cream night without a second thought about what it’s doing to your blood pressure.
Stay vigilant, monitor regularly, and keep that BP in check! The stakes are high, but so are the rewards of a healthier life!
