CC denies three protections in opposition to the decision to hitch nomination committees – 2024-06-27 10:36:24

The Constitutional Court docket (CC) ex officio definitively suspended the processing of three amparo actions that he supposed that the Congress of the Republic repeat the decision to Utility Commissions to elect the magistrates of the Supreme Court docket of Justice (CSJ) y Appeals chambers.

“(…) Amparo will not be the way in which to query an instrument of normal utility that, in accordance with the regulation of the matter, has supplied for the best mechanism that might be invoked: ‘unconstitutionality’,” defined the CC in his ruling.

Two of the three amparos have been requested by Romeo González Barrios and the opposite by Manuel Emilio Lara Ayala.

The CC’s rulings have been handed down this Tuesday, June 25, as extraordinary court docket of safety.

The candidates’ allegations

González Barrios argued in one of many authorized actions that the Congress when calling the postulators didn’t consider a decision of the CC issued in 2020, the place the “Court docket urged Congress to make a means of constitutional and authorized reform viable to permit the institution of an satisfactory course of for the choice and appointment of Magistrates of Supreme Court docket of Justice and of the Chambers of the Court docket of Appeals and different Collegiate Courts of equal class.”

Whereas within the different, González Barrios alleged that the Congress “did not adjust to article 3 of the Utility Commissions Legislationin that it should name to combine the Utility Commissions throughout the authorized time period.”

Within the safety requested by Lara Ayala, he indicated that there have been errors in stated name, since in his opinion, the Congress didn’t adjust to the “minimal formalities required by the elemental regulation, through the use of incomprehensible phrases and out of context within the space during which they happen.”

Different CC rulings

On June 11 the CC additionally ex officio definitively suspended the processing of the safety requested by Saúl Israel Ramos Zárate, who said that the Congress needed to chorus “from finishing up acts that interrupt the five-year time period for which the magistrates of the Court docket have been appointed.” Supreme Court docket of Justiceof Court docket of Appeals and different Courts of equal class.”

In addition to, the CC maintains that in October there should be a change of judicial authorities, this as a result of a authorized motion that sought to postpone, for 5 years, the present magistracy didn’t happen.

He plenary session didn’t decree the provisional suspension of the legislative agreements that validated the election of the present Supreme Court docket of Justice (CSJ) and Courts of Appeals, as sought by unconstitutionality 3061-2024.

This motion was introduced by lawyer Melkin Amílcar Escobar Palma, who within the 2023 normal elections was departmental prosecutor for the Vamos political celebration.


#denies #protections #name #be a part of #nomination #committees

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.