2024-09-03 02:30:00
The Federal Court of Criminal Appeal will review the judicial decision to lift the comprehensive ban on the assets of former President Alberto Fernandezhis former personal secretary Maria Cantero and her husband Héctor Martínez Sosa, as well as the other defendants in the case, allegedly channeled money to public organizations through the National Bank There were irregularities when signing the insurance contract.
The country’s highest federal criminal court accepted the prosecutor’s office’s appeal and agreed to review the June 6 decision of the Second Chamber of the Buenos Aires Federal Court.
At that time, the Intermediate Court of Appeal in Comodoro Py 2002 quashed the decision of the judge who heard the case, Julian Ercolini, ordered a comprehensive freeze on the assets of the former president, Cantero, Martinez Sosa and other defendantsin addition to the companies and associations under investigation.
Dictators don’t like this
The practice of professional and critical journalism is a fundamental pillar of democracy. That’s why it bothers those who think they have the truth.
The prosecutor’s office appealed, but the decision was dismissed, followed by a direct complaint. Judge of the Fourth Division of the Supreme Court Gustavo Hornos, Javier Carbajo and Diego Barlotavenha decide to accept the complaint and approve the prosecutor’s appealso they will review the resolved issues.
“The reasons expressed by the Prosecutor’s Office in its challenge are legitimate, arguing that the contested decision can – in light of the extra-legal regulations invoked and taking into account the specific circumstances of the case cited – amount to an unequivocal statement, as long as it will be susceptible to Cause damage that cannot be repaired or can be repaired at a later stage, making the compensation purpose of criminal proceedings illusory.” said the resolution.
In view of this, and “without implying a decision as to the substance of the issues raised, it is appropriate to accept the complaint submitted by a representative of the Prosecutor’s Office,” Falsely declared appeal dismissed and approve it,” they concluded.
Alberto Fernandez said the complaint was “vague and baseless”
Alberto Fernández, who defended himself in the Seguros case last week, assured that the case involved “a political persecution carried out directly by the criminal system”. Likewise, he insisted that the complaints were “vague and baseless” because they were based on vague and journalistic information, as well as allegedly false and inaccurate data, and that, in his opinion, they did not indicate any criminal conduct.
The former president submitted a 48-page document to federal Judge Julian Ercolini, written in the first person but also signed by his lawyer Mariana Barbitta. The former president harshly criticized the Justice Department, pointing to the decree he signed forcing a state insurance contract with Nación Seguros Trying to ensure premiums don’t end up in the hands of “foreign companies” And it is expressly stipulated that there should be no middlemen.
Fernandez: “They did not explain what the specific violation was (…) let alone how it should be carried out” “This decision is intended to ensure that the state pays to insure its risks, still in the hands of the same country” he explained. In addition, the former president also mentioned that the state department had reached policy agreement with the agent Héctor Martínez Sosa, the husband of his former secretary Maria Canteroand other companies, They hire not “insurance producers” but insurance consultants.
Regarding the complaint, the former president stated that it was based on horn e information basethe document was used as the basis for “complaints filed by judicial officials, representatives or departments close to the incoming government.” “The most serious thing is not that politicians – in a trivial way – try to use criminal justice as a means of persecution, but that they actually The federal judiciary automatically receives these accusations and arbitrarily files judicial cases based on journalists’ statements and false news.” he added.
In his defense, Fernandez said the complaint included The “ideological color” of economics and liberalismSince “the ‘monopoly’ in the national insurance field is the focus of complaints,” it is in line with the state’s idea of minimizing intervention in the economy. Then He described the accusations as “vague and baseless”.because “they did not explain what the specific violations were or what the regulations were, let alone how they were supposed to proceed.”
Why they removed restrictions on Alberto Fernandez’s assets
In June, chamber members Eduardo Farah and Roberto Boyco took the decision to lift the asset ban over the objections of Martin Iluca. “Taking cumbersome precautions such as a blanket asset ban Requires, at least in principle, that defendants be summoned to testify under investigationbecause of his alleged involvement in the crime. This is required by law. Here, the judge remains undecided,” Farah argued.
Boyko agreed with Farah, noting that “magistrates directly imposed blanket suppression of assets.” The type, level and limits of each responsibility are not even defined Natural and legal persons covered by the measure. Nor – and this is a crucial point – its economic scope”. Iluka, on the other hand, believes that “the current developments in the directive indicate the existence of prima facie evidence supporting the legal correctness of the measures taken.”
Beneficiaries of this measure include Alberto Fernández and Alberto Carlos Pagliano, Héctor Martínez Sosa y Compañía SA, Héctor Horacio Martínez Sosa, Guillermo Alejandro Alonso, María Marta Cantero, TG Broker SA, Pablo Andrés Torresmoa, Guillera, Guillera, Gréa, Wow Torrés Torréer. Alfredo Tortora, Ricardo Daniel González, Castello Mercuri SA, Oscar Alberto Castello, Ernesto Mercuri, San Ignacio Sociedad De Productos Asesores De Seguros SA, Brian Kelly, Hernán Marcos Bressi, San Germán Seguros SA, Héctor, Basilulal, Hernán Bressi, San Germán Seguros SA, Héctor Baldini, Mauro Damián Tanos, María Victoria Bisogni, Alfredo Del Corro, Mariana Lourdes Trupia, Carlos Alberto Suárez, Marcos Federico Eufemio, Damián Gosso, Diego Nicolás Rosendi, Lucas Pablo Rosendi, 7 De Mayo Cooper Cooperativa De Traada .
ML/DS
1725333280
#Supreme #Court #review #ruling #lifting #exPresident #Alberto #Fernandezs #asset #ban
