The Carter Center, one of the most prestigious organizations that was able to observe the July 28 presidential elections in Venezuela, confirmed that its analysis gives Edmundo González Urrutia as the winner of the elections.
Jennie Lincoln, head of the Carter Center’s observation mission, explained to AFP that the organization has «analyzed the numbers» available alongside other organisations and universities and “confirms Edmundo González Urrutia as the winner with more than 60%” of the votes,
The opposition published copies of more than 80% of the minutes on a website, which it claims to be They prove the victory of González Urrutia -representative of the leader María Corina Machado- with 67% of the votes, but the CNE gave him 43% against 52% of MaduroThe regime rejects the validity of these documents and claims that they are forged.
“It’s pure theater”“Lincoln said, preferring not to comment on contacts with the authorities of the CNE or the government since the Carter Center estimated in a public statement that the election “it did not conform to international parameters and standards of electoral integrity” and could not “be considered democratic”«.
Regarding the alleged hacking of the CNE’s computer system, the representative of the Carter Center said: “Companies monitor and know when there are denials of service (hackings) and there was not one that night.” “The transmission of voting data is by telephone line and satellite phone and not by computer. They have not lost data.”“, he assured.
Lincoln recalled that the president of the CNE, Elvis Amoroso, “He said he would publish the results table by table on the website and give a CD to the political parties» when he announced a first bulletin. “It’s a promise he never kept”indicated the organization’s advisor for Latin America and the Caribbean.
«Despite the uneven playing field, the Venezuelan people went to vote»he continued in reference to the elections. “The great irregularity of the election day was the lack of transparency of the CNE and the flagrant non-observance of its rules of the game in terms of showing the true vote of the people.“, he noted.
Lincoln considered that It is premature to comment on the Carter Center’s willingness to participate in an audit of the election.. “I am incredulous, skeptical about what an international verification team could do that the witnesses, who produced the true minutes of the night, have not done.”
The Carter Center was invited by the National Electoral Council (CNE) to observe the disputed elections in which President Nicolás Maduro was proclaimed re-elected for a third six-year term.
Maduro received his delegation before the elections, as did the Minister of Defense, Vladimir Padrino López, Both highlighted the seriousness and track record of the organization. “It is a center that has earned a worldwide reputation, not only in electoral tasks, but in tasks of promoting democracy and conflict resolution. It is a non-profit, non-governmental institution that has made history and because of the seriousness it represents in this matter, it is the reason why the CNE has invited them to accompany us in these upcoming elections.”Padrino said when meeting with the delegation of that organization.
#Carter #Center #numbers #confirm #González #Urrutias #victory
2024-09-07 19:17:30
What are the main discrepancies reported by the Carter Center regarding the election results in Venezuela?
Table of Contents
The Carter Center’s Observations on the Venezuelan Presidential Elections: A Call for Transparency
The Carter Center, a renowned organization known for its election observation and monitoring, has been at the forefront of observing the highly contested presidential elections in Venezuela on July 28. The Center’s analysis has sparked controversy, with Jennie Lincoln, head of the Carter Center’s observation mission, confirming Edmundo González Urrutia as the winner of the elections with more than 60% of the votes [[1]][[2]][[3]]. This contradicts the official results announced by the National Electoral Council (CNE), which declared President Nicolás Maduro the winner with 52% of the votes.
Discrepancies in Election Results
The opposition has published copies of more than 80% of the minutes on a website, claiming that they prove González Urrutia’s victory with 67% of the votes. However, the CNE has disputed the validity of these documents, labeling them as forged. Lincoln has expressed skepticism about the official results, stating that the election “did not conform to international parameters and standards of electoral integrity” and could not “be considered democratic” [[1]][[2]][[3]].
Allegations of Hacking and Cyberattacks
Regarding the alleged hacking of the CNE’s computer system, Lincoln has assured that “companies monitor and know when there are denials of service (hackings) and there was not one that night.” She emphasized that the transmission of voting data is by telephone line and satellite phone, not by computer, and that no data was lost [[1]][[2]][[3]]. The Carter Center has found no evidence to support claims of a cyberattack during the elections, as stated by Lincoln in an interview with AFP [[1]].
Lack of Transparency and Uneven Playing Field
Lincoln has criticized the CNE for its lack of transparency, particularly in not publishing the election results at the polling station level as promised. She noted that “the great irregularity of the election day was the lack of transparency of the CNE and the flagrant non-observance of its rules of the game in terms of showing the true vote of the people” [[1]][[2]][[3]]. The Carter Center has called upon the CNE to immediately publish the presidential election results at the polling station level, emphasizing the need for transparency and accountability in the electoral process [[2]][[3]].
Audit and International Verification
When asked about the possibility of participating in an audit of the election, Lincoln expressed skepticism, stating that she was “incredulous” about what an international verification team could do that the witnesses, who produced the true minutes of the night, had not done [[1]][[2]][[3]]. The Carter Center has not ruled out the possibility of participating in an audit, but it remains unclear what such an effort would entail.
The Carter Center’s Reputation and Credibility
The Carter Center’s reputation and credibility have been acknowledged by both Maduro and the Minister of Defense, Vladimir Padrino López, who highlighted the organization’s seriousness and track record [[1]][[2]][[3]]. The Center’s involvement in the Venezuelan presidential elections has brought attention to the importance of transparency, accountability, and international observation in ensuring the integrity of democratic elections.
the Carter Center’s observations on the Venezuelan presidential elections have raised important questions about the transparency and integrity of the electoral process. As an organization known for its election monitoring and observation, the Center’s findings have sparked controversy and highlighted the need for accountability and transparency in democratic elections.
Carter center venezuela statement
The Carter Center’s Observations on Venezuela’s Presidential Elections: Irregularities and Lack of Electoral Integrity
The Carter Center, a renowned organization with a long history of promoting democracy and conflict resolution, has spoken out about the irregularities and lack of electoral integrity in Venezuela’s recent presidential elections. The organization, which was invited by the National Electoral Council (CNE) to observe the elections, has confirmed that its analysis gives Edmundo González Urrutia as the winner of the elections, contradicting the official results announced by the CNE [[3]].
Jennie Lincoln, head of the Carter Center’s observation mission, explained that the organization has analyzed the numbers available alongside other organizations and universities and confirms Edmundo González Urrutia as the winner with more than 60% of the votes. This contradicts the official results, which gave President Nicolás Maduro 52% of the votes and González Urrutia 43% [[1]].
The opposition has published copies of more than 80% of the minutes on a website, which it claims to be evidence of González Urrutia’s victory with 67% of the votes. However, the regime has rejected the validity of these documents, claiming that they are forged. Lincoln described the situation as “pure theater” and preferred not to comment on contacts with the authorities of the CNE or the government since the Carter Center estimated in a public statement that the election did not conform to international parameters and standards of electoral integrity and could not be considered democratic [[2]].
Regarding the alleged hacking of the CNE’s computer system, Lincoln assured that companies monitor and know when there are denials of service (hackings) and there was not one that night. She also clarified that the transmission of voting data is by telephone line and satellite phone and not by computer, and therefore, the data has not been lost [[1]].
Lincoln recalled that the president of the CNE, Elvis Amoroso, promised to publish the results table by table on the website and give a CD to the political parties when he announced a first bulletin, but this promise was never kept. She noted that the great irregularity of the election day was the lack of transparency of the CNE and the flagrant non-observance of its rules of the game in terms of showing the true vote of the people [[1]].
When asked about the Carter Center’s willingness to participate in an audit of the election, Lincoln considers it premature to comment, saying that she is “incredulous, skeptical about what an international verification team could do that the witnesses, who produced the true minutes of the night, have not done” [[1]].
The Carter Center’s observation of the elections is significant, given its reputation as a non-profit, non-governmental institution that has earned a worldwide reputation in promoting democracy and conflict resolution. Maduro received the Carter Center’s delegation before the elections, as did the Minister of Defense, Vladimir Padrino López, both highlighting the seriousness and track record of the organization [[1]].
the Carter Center’s observations on Venezuela’s presidential elections highlight the lack of electoral integrity and the irregularities that occurred during the voting process. The organization’s analysis confirms González Urrutia as the winner of the elections, contradicting the official results announced by the CNE. The Carter Center’s findings are a testament to the importance of electoral integrity and the need for transparency in democratic processes.
References:
Note: The article is SEO-optimized with relevant keywords, including “Carter Center”, “Venezuela”, “presidential elections”, “electoral integrity”, and “democracy”. The article structure and content are designed to provide a comprehensive overview of the topic, with clear headings and concise paragraphs.
