Omar Abdel Qader Ghandour*
The Swiss embassy in Beirut hastened, following its retraction from the parties and representatives’ invitation to a dinner invited by Ambassador Marion and Shalit, and the Saudi embassy’s objection to it, despite the fact that the Saudi embassy was aware of the Swiss ambassador’s intention for more than a month.
Through the announced positions, it was found that the invitation of the Swiss embassy did not come from a vacuum, and the objection of the Saudi embassy also did not come from a vacuum…
It was understood that the invitation of the Swiss ambassador to the dinner was dictated by the desire for a national dialogue, and not for a discussion dealing with the Taif Agreement, nor targeting it, nor having anything to do with the Lebanese constitutional entitlements. The dinner was accompanied by the threat of a statement to the Arab clans by the changeable deputy Ibrahim Mneimneh, followed immediately by a marathon tour of the Saudi ambassador to Baabda Palace and Ain al-Tineh and other meetings and contacts…
The Swiss embassy was surprised by the reactions, and made it clear that it does not interfere in the internal affairs of Lebanon, and it is in its tradition to make good efforts at the moment, and to host several dialogue meetings.
While Ambassador Walid Al-Bukhari said dangerous words that might justify concerns and warn against replacing the Taif Agreement with entities that do not resemble Lebanon’s message!
Is this a very significant and dimensional sign? As evidenced by the concerns of several Western embassies, including the embassies of Britain, France and Switzerland, which warn of the outbreak of security chaos from the north, spearheaded by military actions in support of the Takfiri organizations that threaten the stability of Lebanon.
Although the various Lebanese agencies confirm the absence of realistic indicators or reliable data that reinforce these warnings, we do not underestimate the barometer of the head of the Progressive Socialist Party, Walid Jumblatt, who senses such warnings and misgivings, and fears a moving chaos in Lebanon and his words to President Nabih Berri (according to Al-Akhbar newspaper ) that he does not want to enter into a party that incites to the weapons of the resistance, and that he deals with this file on the basis that it is related to regional and international situations, and he also says that he is working to vent congestion in the areas where he enjoys influence, (as if he insults aggression against the resistance after approving the maritime demarcation that The resistance came out victorious…)
There are data confirming that Lebanon will enter a more dangerous stage than the previous stage in light of the presence of espionage networks and the number of clients estimated at thousands, which makes the whole country vulnerable to mobile and sectarian strife in particular!
وفي معلوماتنا انّ الفتنة المذهبية لن تكون أبداً لأن الجهة القادرة والفاعلة ليست في وارد الانجرار اليها، بل ستتعاون مع القيادات الزمنية والروحية لخنقها ولتعارضها مع قاعدة “وَلْتَكُن مِّنكُمْ أُمَّةٌ يَدْعُونَ إِلَى الْخَيْرِ وَيَأْمُرُونَ بِالْمَعْرُوفِ وَيَنْهَوْنَ عَنِ الْمُنكَرِ ۚ وَأُولَٰئِكَ هُمُ الْمُفْلِحُونَ (١٠٤) وَلَا تَكُونُوا كَالَّذِينَ They became divided and differed after the clear proofs came to them, and those will have a great punishment.” (105)
As for the political strife that targets Lebanon to serve “Israel” and its protectors and for wrong and reckless calculations, those concerned say that dealing with the tools will be firm and not divisible by two at a time when the national interest imposes the formation of a new government and the election of a new president of the republic.
ـــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــ
* President of the Islamic Unionist Gathering