Canada is no longer the “land of our ancestors”. And our history is no longer really an epic of the most brilliant exploits. It is a geographical territory that wants to welcome millions of immigrants from all over the world. Under Justin Trudeau, he was stripped of his soul. When the authorities keep referring to “unceded indigenous territories”, it is legitimate to wonder who owns Canadian land.
In fact, Canada is a playground where towers of Babel are settling everywhere and which is regarding to impose a multilingualism, not yet avowable, that Prime Minister Trudeau wants to cherish and carefully preserve.
Let’s open our arms wide to all immigrants, of course, but let’s know that according to the law of numbers, they will end up demanding services in their language of origin.
It is also imperative to stop making judgments regarding all the cultural and political excesses of citizens who are reluctant to adapt to a common core of values. The values of the future will then be imposed by micro-groups, militants of the kind that we already know and who will demand for them that we transform the laws of yesteryear deemed to be discriminatory, sexist and racist.
National symbols
How to live in a country which wishes to free itself from the symbols which contributed to model a vision to which the new citizens can adhere without having been rooted in it beforehand?
What is Canada today? Francophones, who until very recently were described as one of the two founding peoples, would be quite naive if they continued to believe in their survival from coast to coast.
Even if Justin Trudeau gives in to excessive excitement in believing that at the end of the century one hundred million Canadians will occupy the territory, it is certain that French-speaking Quebecers will be endangered.
Ever bigger, ever more populated, such will be Canada. But still less French-speaking. How many of our descendants will speak French at the end of the century?
What is a postnational Canada? What is beyond the nation? Just individuals agglutinated on the same territory without attachment to its history.
Destination des immigrants
Can we believe that the Acadians, who have served for so long as a moral alibi in Canada, will resist a new multi-ethnic immigration? Because it will be necessary to settle the immigrants where there are reception structures. Where will we send the 500,000 newcomers a year, according to Justin Trudeau’s dreams? In the Far North, this cold territory whose climatic conditions would be a challenge for the vast majority of people?
The coming decades promise to be catastrophic due to the continual degradation of the planetary environment. Can we oppose large dams and companies that exploit the energy resources of the Far North?
Trapped in its current ethics, Canada cannot pursue its policy of giving lessons to the rest of the world.
Can individual freedom take precedence over all collective freedoms? Unless we make it the unavoidable reference, in which case triumphant wokism will have become the sacred temple of Canada, as it develops in the head of Justin, the prince of emptiness.
