The officer Denis Sergeev has been charged by the British police for the attempted murder of the former Russian intelligence officer Sergei Skripal and his daughter Yulia in Salisbury in 2018. Skripal was a double agent and was tried to be liquidated by the Russian intelligence service GRU.
– Sergeev supported the preparations behind and the use of the nerve agent novichok in Salisbury – and had a coordinating role from London during the attack, says a statement from the British authorities.
Skripal and his daughter Julija were found unconscious on a bench in Salisbury in March 2018. British authorities believe Russian intelligence smeared novichok on the handle of Skripal’s front door.
British police have charged three Russian citizens, including Sergeev, in their absence for the attempted murder. The British believe these are GRU officers. Skripal has stated that he believes the assassination was carried out on direct orders from Russian President Vladimir Putin, while the Russian authorities deny that they are involved.
Sanctions have also been introduced against several people linked to the Russian mercenary group Wagner, which, among other things, is waging war in the Sahel and the Middle East.
#Britain #introduces #sanctions #Russia #Russians
**Interview with Jane Doe, International Relations Expert**
**Editor:** Hello, Jane. Thank you for joining us today to discuss the recent charges against Denis Sergeev in the Skripal poisoning case. To start, how significant do you find the British authorities charging Sergeev and two other Russian citizens regarding this attempted murder?
**Jane Doe:** Thank you for having me. The charges highlight a larger narrative surrounding international espionage and state-sponsored crimes. It signals to the world that the UK is not willing to let this case fade into obscurity and is actively pursuing justice.
**Editor:** The announcement also ties directly to claims from Sergei Skripal that the assassination attempt was ordered by Russian President Vladimir Putin. How does this affect diplomatic relations moving forward?
**Jane Doe:** The implications are profound. Should these allegations gain traction, they could further strain already tense relations between Russia and the West. This opens the floor for debates about accountability in international affairs—particularly about the actions of state actors.
**Editor:** With sanctions already enacted against individuals linked to Russia, do you think such measures against the GRU will actually deter future attempts of this nature?
**Jane Doe:** That’s a contentious point. While sanctions can serve as a disincentive, they often have mixed results. Some argue they merely escalate tensions and encourage more covert operations. It raises the question: Is punitive action effective, or does it merely perpetuate a cycle of retaliation?
**Editor:** Which leads us to our debate topic for readers: In cases like the Skripal poisoning, do you believe punitive measures like sanctions are effective deterrents against state-sponsored attacks, or do they simply provoke further hostility? We invite everyone to share their thoughts. Thank you, Jane, for your insights!
