Brasilia, Nov 1 (EFE).- The Government of Brazil criticized this Friday the “offensive tone” adopted by the Venezuelan Executive, after the latter called its ambassador in Brasilia for consultations and criticized the “interventionism” of the Brazilian authorities .
“The Brazilian Government notes with surprise the offensive tone adopted by demonstrations by Venezuelan authorities in relation to Brazil and its national symbols,” reads the statement released by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
The Foreign Ministry added that the resort to “personal attacks”, instead of traditional political and diplomatic channels, “does not correspond to the respectful way with which the Brazilian Government treats Venezuela.”
On the other hand, he clarified that Brazil “fully” respects the sovereignty of each country, and affirmed that its interest in the Venezuelan electoral process derives from its status as a witness to the Barbados Agreements signed between the Executive of President Nicolás Maduro and the opposition. , who have denounced that they were raped by the Chavista Government.
“The Brazilian Government remains convinced that associations must be based on frank dialogue, respect for differences and mutual understanding,” stated the Foreign Ministry.
Venezuela summoned its ambassador in Brazil, Manuel Vedell, for consultations this Wednesday, after rejecting statements, which it called “interference and rude”, by Celso Amorim, advisor for international affairs to President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva
Amorim said during an appearance in the Brazilian Congress that “the principle of transparency was not respected” in the July 28 presidential elections, so Maduro’s proclaimed victory could not be recognized.
The Government of Venezuela also expressed its “total repudiation” of Brazil’s opposition to Venezuela becoming an associate member of the BRICS group of emerging countries, which met recently in the Russian city of Kazan.
This Thursday, on social networks, the Bolivarian National Police published an image with a silhouette of Lula on the Brazilian flag, in which he wrote “he who messes with Venezuela dries up.”
Previously, the Attorney General of Venezuela, Tarek William Saab, considered that Lula has become “a CIA agent” and the president of the National Assembly, Jorge Rodríguez, insinuated the same about Amorim, whom he asked to declare “non-person.” pleasant.”
Since Maduro’s alleged victory was declared in the July elections, Lula’s Government has tried to mediate in the conflict and has demanded that the Venezuelan authorities publish the electoral records, a request that has been ignored.
.
#Brazil #criticizes #offensive #tone #Venezuelan #Government #midst #escalation #tensions
**Interview with Dr. Maria Carvalho, International Relations Expert**
**Host:** Welcome, Dr. Carvalho! Thank you for joining us today to discuss the recent tensions between Brazil and Venezuela following Brazil’s veto of Venezuela’s admission to the Brics group.
**Dr. Carvalho:** Thank you for having me. I’m glad to be here to discuss such an important issue.
**Host:** Let’s start with Brazil’s recent criticism of Venezuela for its “offensive tone.” How significant is the diplomatic language used by both nations during this incident?
**Dr. Carvalho:** Diplomatic language is always significant, but it’s particularly crucial in this context. The Brazilian government’s decision to highlight Venezuela’s “offensive tone” underscores their expectation of a more respectful diplomatic discourse. When one country feels slighted by another, it can lead to a deterioration of relations, making constructive dialogue more challenging.
**Host:** Venezuela’s government is frustrated with Brazil’s veto. What implications could this have for the regional dynamics in South America?
**Dr. Carvalho:** The implications could be quite significant. Venezuela and Brazil share borders, and their relations play a crucial role in regional stability. A public fallout could deepen Venezuela’s isolation and result in Brazil leaning closer to other allies within the region who may have differing views on Venezuela’s political situation.
**Host:** Brazil mentioned that their interest in Venezuela’s electoral process is rooted in historical agreements. Can you elaborate on why this is important?
**Dr. Carvalho:** Certainly. The Barbados Agreements were meant to facilitate dialogue between the Venezuelan government and opposition, aiming for a peaceful resolution to their longstanding political crisis. As a witness to these agreements, Brazil has a vested interest in maintaining regional stability. By taking a stand on Venezuela’s admission to Brics, Brazil may be signaling to both support regional governance while also holding Venezuela accountable to international expectations.
**Host:** How do you think this situation might evolve in the coming months, particularly with ongoing elections in Venezuela?
**Dr. Carvalho:** It’s difficult to predict with certainty, but the tensions could either escalate, leading to more severe diplomatic isolation for Venezuela, or they could open pathways for negotiations if Venezuela becomes more amenable to dialogue. Brazil’s position could influence other regional powers in how they choose to engage with Venezuela moving forward.
**Host:** Fascinating insights, Dr. Carvalho. Thank you for shedding light on this complex situation.
**Dr. Carvalho:** Thank you! I appreciate the opportunity to discuss these important developments.
