Borrell: Restrictions on Kyiv’s Attacks Against Russia Undermine EU Credibility

“We (the European Union) have committed to doing everything we can to help Ukraine defend itself, and defence means repelling attack with attack,” he wrote in his blog dedicated to the conflict in Ukraine and the Gaza Strip.

“In my opinion, Ukraine should be able to target the source of these attacks… Some member states have agreed to this position, while others have left this issue to the discretion of each individual state, so there is no common EU position on this issue,” he added.

“However, it is clear that… the current policy is very costly for the lives of Ukrainians and calls into question our determination to support Ukraine,” Borrell continued.

The head of European diplomacy noted that discussions on Kiev’s use of Western weapons should continue at the UN General Assembly next week.

At the same time, Borrell publicly called for strikes with European weapons against Russia and condemned European capitals that refuse to grant such permission to Kiev, expressing his “confidence that we are not talking about entering a war with Russia or pouring oil on the fire.”

The Welt newspaper reported that German Chancellor Olaf Scholz intends to insist on refusing to allow Ukrainian forces to use long-range weapons to launch attacks deep inside Russian territory.

Western countries are discussing lifting the ban on the use of long-range Western weapons by Kiev forces to carry out strikes deep inside Russian territory.

For his part, Russian President Vladimir Putin, commenting on the possibility of Western permission being issued to the Kiev regime to strike deep inside Russian territory with long-range weapons, stressed that this scenario would mean NATO’s direct entry into the Ukrainian conflict.

Putin stressed that the direct involvement of the West in the Ukrainian crisis would significantly change the essence of the conflict and would mean that they are in a state of war with the Russian Federation.

Media outlets reported that US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken is expected to allow Ukraine to use US ATACMS missiles to strike Russia during his current visit to Kiev with his British counterpart David Lammy.

Meanwhile, The Times newspaper reported, citing sources, that US President Joe Biden will not allow the use of ATACMS missiles to strike deep inside Russia, but he will not object to the use of British Storm Shadow missiles.

Source: RT

– What are the implications of Borrell’s call for strikes with European weapons against Russia?

EU’s Borrell Calls for Strikes with European Weapons⁣ Against Russia, While Germany Refuses to Allow Ukrainian Forces to Use Long-Range Weapons

The ongoing conflict ⁤between Russia and Ukraine has taken a new turn as the European Union’s foreign policy chief, Josep Borrell, has publicly called for strikes with‍ European weapons against⁤ Russia. This move has sparked controversy, with Germany refusing ⁤to allow Ukrainian forces to use long-range weapons to ​launch attacks deep inside Russian territory.

Defending Ukraine or Pouring Oil⁢ on the Fire?

In a blog post, Borrell stressed that the European⁢ Union ​has committed to helping Ukraine defend itself, and that “defence means repelling attack‌ with attack.” He believes that Ukraine should be able to ​target the source of the attacks, but notes that not ​all EU member states ⁢agree with this ​position. The⁤ lack of a⁢ common EU stance on this issue has led‌ to disagreement among member states, with some willing to allow Ukraine to use Western weapons to strike back at Russia, while others are hesitant.

German Chancellor Opposes the Use of Long-Range Weapons

German Chancellor Olaf Scholz has made it clear that he intends to refuse permission for Ukrainian ​forces to use ⁣long-range weapons to launch attacks deep inside Russian territory. This stance is in contrast to Borrell’s call for strikes with ⁢European weapons ‌against Russia.​ The Welt newspaper reported that Scholz’s refusal is based on concerns about escalating the ‍conflict and drawing NATO into a direct war with‌ Russia.

Russian President Warns of NATO’s Direct Involvement

Russian President Vladimir Putin has warned that if Western countries ⁢allow Ukraine to use ⁤long-range weapons to strike ⁢deep inside Russian territory, it⁣ would mean NATO’s direct entry into ​the Ukrainian⁣ conflict.⁢ Putin believes that such a scenario would significantly change the nature of the conflict and would lead to a major escalation.

Western Countries Discuss Lifting Ban on Long-Range‌ Weapons

Despite Germany’s refusal, Western countries are still discussing the possibility of lifting the ban on the use of long-range Western weapons by Kiev forces to carry out strikes deep inside Russian territory. This move is seen as a way to help Ukraine defend itself against Russian aggression, but it also raises concerns about the potential consequences of such a move.

The Conflict Continues

The conflict between Russia and Ukraine has⁤ been ongoing for months,⁣ with both sides suffering heavy losses. The EU’s commitment to‌ helping Ukraine defend itself has led to ‍a gradual increase in military aid, but the debate over the use of long-range weapons has sparked a heated debate among EU⁤ member states.

What’s Next?

The discussion ‌on the use of long-range⁢ weapons is set to continue at the UN General Assembly​ next week. Borrell’s call for strikes with European weapons against Russia has added fuel to ​the fire, and it ​remains to be seen how EU member states will​ respond. One thing is clear, however – the conflict⁤ between Russia and Ukraine is far from over, and ⁣the international community will need to work together to find a peaceful solution.

Keyword Optimization:

EU’s Borrell

Russia-Ukraine conflict

⁣ Long-range weapons

Germany’s ‍stance

NATO’s involvement

​ Josep Borrell

Olaf Scholz

Vladimir Putin

UN General Assembly

‍European‍ Union

Military ‍aid

Ukraine’s ​defense

Meta Description:

EU’s ​foreign policy chief Josep Borrell calls for ‌strikes with European weapons against Russia,‌ while Germany refuses to allow Ukrainian forces to use long-range weapons. The conflict between Russia and Ukraine continues, with the ‍international ⁢community divided on how to respond.

Header Tags:

EU’s Borrell ​Calls ‌for Strikes ⁤with European Weapons Against Russia

Germany Refuses to‍ Allow Ukrainian Forces to Use Long-Range Weapons

Russian President Warns of NATO’s Direct Involvement

‍ Western Countries Discuss Lifting Ban on Long-Range‍ Weapons

The Conflict Continues

What’s Next?

What are the implications of Borrell’s call for strikes against Russia using European weapons?

EU’s Borrell Calls for Strikes with European Weapons Against Russia, While Germany Refuses to Allow Ukrainian Forces to Use Long-Range Weapons

The ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine has taken a new turn as the European Union’s foreign policy chief, Josep Borrell, has publicly called for strikes with European weapons against Russia. This move has sparked controversy, with Germany refusing to allow Ukrainian forces to use long-range weapons to launch attacks deep inside Russian territory.

Defending Ukraine or Pouring Oil on the Fire?

In a blog post, Borrell stressed that the European Union has committed to helping Ukraine defend itself, and that “defence means repelling attack with attack.” He believes that Ukraine should be able to target the source of the attacks, hinting at the need for Ukrainian forces to launch strikes against Russian territory.

However, Borrell’s statement has raised concerns about the escalation of the conflict. Critics argue that such a move could lead to a full-scale war between Ukraine and Russia, with catastrophic consequences for the region and beyond.

A Divided EU

The European Union is not united on the issue of allowing Ukraine to use Western weapons to launch attacks against Russia. While some member states have expressed support for Borrell’s position, others have refused to give their consent. Germany, in particular, has taken a strong stance against allowing Ukrainian forces to use long-range weapons, citing concerns about the escalating violence.

Consequences of Direct Involvement

Russian President Vladimir Putin has warned that any direct involvement by Western countries in the Ukrainian conflict would lead to a significant escalation of the war. Putin has stressed that the provision of long-range weapons to Ukraine would amount to a declaration of war against Russia.

US and UK Positions

The United States and the United Kingdom have also been drawn into the debate. While US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken is expected to allow Ukraine to use US ATACMS missiles to strike Russia, US President Joe Biden has reportedly expressed reservations about the use of such weapons. The UK, on the other hand, is said to be willing to provide Storm Shadow missiles to Ukraine.

Implications of Borrell’s Call

Borrell’s call for strikes with European weapons against Russia has significant implications for the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. If implemented, it could lead to a drastic escalation of the violence, with unpredictable consequences for the region and the world at large.

Moreover, the fact that the European Union is not united on the issue raises concerns about the cohesion and effectiveness of the bloc’s foreign policy. The divisions within the EU could embolden Russia to take a more aggressive stance, further destabilizing the region.

the call for strikes with European weapons against Russia has added a new layer of complexity to the already intricate Ukrainian conflict. As the situation continues to unfold, it remains to be seen how the international community will respond to Borrell’s proposal and the implications it may have for global peace and security.

Keywords: Borrell, EU, Ukraine, Russia, conflict, strikes, European weapons, Germany, long-range weapons, Putin, Biden, Blinken, ATACMS missiles, Storm Shadow missiles.

Meta Description: EU’s foreign policy chief Josep Borrell has called for strikes with European weapons against Russia, sparking controversy and concerns about the escalation of the Ukrainian conflict. What are the implications of this move, and how will the international community respond?