Despite the victory of Boca contra River 1-0 in the argentinian footballmany fans of “Xeneize” exploded against Clarion throught social media. The newspaper chose a very controversial cover, particularly in relation to the “Superclásico”and fans of the team led by Hugo Ibarra They didn’t let it go unnoticed.
With the goal of Darío Benedettothe local stayed with the three points in “The Bombonera” and he definitely caught on in the fight for the title nine dates from the end of the tournament. However, the aforementioned media he preferred to keep other specific situations of the match for the cover.
The shameful cover of Clarín after the triumph of Boca vs. River in the Superclassic
Beyond all the non-sports news on the front page, to communicate the victory of the local in the match that paralyzes Argentine football, they headlined: “The Superclásico, violent, was left for Boca”. In addition, on the flyer they wrote in relation to Rodrigo Allendro, of River: “A fractured player and a disqualifying kick from (Marcos) Rojo”.
The unusual cover of Clarín after the victory of Boca vs. River in the Superclassic.
That was how Clarion did not emphasize the three points achieved by the team Ibarra, but in the alleged rough play during the 90 minutes. Already on the descent, from the sports section of the newspaper they wrote: “The match was characterized by strong crosses. Due to a knee, midfielder Aliendro suffered a malar fracture, was hospitalized, will undergo surgery today and will miss the rest of the championship. The referee was not called by the VAR nor did the TV repeat the move”.
Also, from Clarion completed: “At the end, Rojo was expelled again for launching a violent kick against the face of (Nicolás) De La Cruz. Boca won 1-0 with a header from Benedetto in the second half. With his victory, he was two points behind the only leader, Atlético Tucumán, when there are 9 dates left to play. Gymnastics, who lost to Newell’s, is the only shooting guard for the Tucuman team”.
The fury of Boca fans against Clarín
fundamentally in Twitterseveral followers of “Xeneize” they liquidated the newspaper with comments, memes, videos, photos and gifs. The anger was centered on the communication medium prioritized two specific plays to make its summary on the cover and not the most important thing: the result.
So, to show anger, there were comments of all kinds about it. Among them were: “(Daniel) Angelici lost, everything is joy”; “cover design: a son of Jorge Brito (the president of River)”; “B”; “they failed to put a diagonal band on the lid, a sleeve of bitters”; and “what cover/journal of shit What is it Clarion“.