BlackRock Launches New iShares Prime and Government Money Market ETFs

BlackRock’s Latest Shenanigans: ETFs for Everyone!

Ah, Thursday. That sacred day of the week when we all collectively pretend we’re actually excited about a long weekend while secretly plotting how to get that extra slice of pizza from the office fridge. But lo and behold, on this fine Thursday, BlackRock decided to spice things up by submitting documents to introduce two shiny new money market funds as exchange-traded funds. Because, you know, why just have regular funds when you can have fancy ones with a snazzy name like iShares Prime Money Market and iShares Government Money Market ETFs?

According to the latest updates, these spiffy ETF offerings are going to comply with Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 2a-7. That’s right folks, investment grade ratings and minimal credit risk are BACK! It’s almost like BlackRock is saying, “Hey investors, we know you like to keep it safe. So, how about some funds that carry all the excitement of watching paint dry, but with slightly better returns?”

And just to keep things interesting, we also had Texas Capital Bancshares Inc making headlines with their own ETF launch back in September. If you thought BlackRock’s offerings would bring peace to the money market chaos, think again. The Financial Times reported that both BlackRock funds are focusing on securities that mature in 397 days or less — talk about commitment issues! With a dollar-weighted average maturity of 60 days or less, these funds are definitely on a short leash.

Now, let’s dive into the money gossip, or rather the fee gossip, shall we? Fees for BlackRock’s proposed ETFs are currently a mystery wrapped in a riddle, but Texas Capital’s magic number stands at a modest 0.20%. Meanwhile, BlackRock’s existing similar ETFs are strutting around with lower fees—0.05% for the iShares US Treasury Bond (BATS:GOVT) and 0.09% for the 0-3 month Treasury ETF. Clearly, BlackRock is trying to play it cool while still winning the ‘who can charge less’ competition.

In a stunning plot twist, just last month, BlackRock decided to pull the shutters down on two open-end money market funds. They claimed it was in response to upcoming SEC rule changes forcing liquidity fees for major institutional funds. Honestly, you had to hand it to them—those funds were like that one friend who always wants to borrow money, but then complains about returning it. So, they just bowed out gracefully instead.

But wait! There are more over-the-top developments in the money market industry! The whopping $6.3 trillion money market industry recently welcomed its first ETF, the Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF (NYSE:MMKT). Apparently, it’s drawing investors like moths to a flame, offering a sweet escape from the volatile uncertainty of the stock market. High short-term yields plus the safety of traditional money market funds? That’s a triple shot of “yeah, I’m into it” for investors!

ETF Performances: Who’s Laughing All the Way to the Bank?

So, how are our existing money market fund ETFs faring in this fiscal circus?

  • NEOS Enhanced Income 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (NYSE:CSHI): This fund recently reported a one-year return of 5.72%. Not bad, considering the category average is hovering at 6.51%. But if this fund were a student, it would be the one getting that awkward “needs improvement” note from the teacher.
  • Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF (NYSE:GSY): With $2.23 billion in net assets, this fund is bringing home the bacon with an annual return of 6.76%, beating the category average of 6.51%. It’s practically the overachieving kid in class—always just a little bit ahead.
  • PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF (NYSE:PULS): Holding court with $8.56 billion in net assets, this fund succeeded with a one-year return of 6.53%, also just outshining the category average. If it were a contestant in a baking show, it would be the one making lava cakes that only slightly collapse—which, believe me, is still impressive.

In conclusion, just like a rogue squirrel on a power line, the world of money market ETFs is a nutty place full of rapid changes and surprises. So, if you’re an investor, strap in and enjoy the ride. Remember, in finance, as in life, if someone offers you a shiny new ETF, don’t just take their word for it—do your homework first! After all, who doesn’t love a good plot twist?

Disclaimer: This content was produced in part with the assistance of Benzinga Neuro and was reviewed and published by Benzinga editors. We aim to make finance entertaining, sort of like combining a trip to the circus with your most boring math class.

Photo by rafapress on Shutterstock

On Thursday, BlackRock officially filed documents aimed at launching two innovative money market funds designed as exchange-traded funds (ETFs). These upcoming offerings, the iShares Prime Money Market and iShares Government Money Market ETFs, will adhere to the rigorous standards set forth by Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 2a-7, thereby ensuring they carry investment-grade ratings and pose minimal credit risk to investors.

This strategic move follows closely on the heels of Texas Capital Bancshares Inc (NASDAQ:TCBI) debuting its premier ETF under Rule 2a-7 in September. According to a report from the Financial Times on Thursday, both of BlackRock’s proposed funds are specifically designed to concentrate on securities that are set to mature in 397 days or less, with a dollar-weighted average maturity not exceeding 60 days and a dollar-weighted average life limited to 120 days.

While the filings did not reveal the specific fee structures for the proposed ETFs, it is noteworthy that Texas Capital’s ETF charges an expense ratio of 0.20%. In comparison, BlackRock’s existing lineup of similar ETFs features notably lower fees, with the iShares US Treasury Bond ETF (BATS:GOVT) set at just 0.05% and the 0-3 month Treasury ETF at 0.09%.

In September, BlackRock made the decision to liquidate two of its open-end money market funds in anticipation of forthcoming SEC rule modifications that demand liquidity fees for major institutional funds. This decision is part of a larger adaptation to a rapidly evolving regulatory landscape.

The introduction of these new ETFs by BlackRock occurs amid significant developments within the money market sector. The industry, which boasts an impressive $6.3 trillion in assets, recently celebrated the launch of its inaugural ETF, the Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF (NYSE:MMKT). This ETF uniquely positions itself to offer investors a secure refuge with attractive returns, while delivering the intraday liquidity and stability typically associated with conventional money market funds.

Here is how some of the existing money market fund ETFs have performed over the past year:

  • NEOS Enhanced Income 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (NYSE:CSHI): managed by Neos Funds, this fund currently has $465 million in net assets, posting a one-year return of 5.72%, slightly trailing behind the category average of 6.51%.
  • Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF (NYSE:GSY): Close to $2.23 billion in net assets were amassed by this ETF, launched by I invest, which aims to provide higher returns than cash equivalents, while ensuring capital preservation and daily liquidity. The fund achieved an annual return of 6.76%, outperforming the category average of 6.51%, with a three-year return of 3.62% compared to 3.49% for the category.
  • PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF (NYSE:PULS): Issued by PGIM Investments, this ETF maintains net assets nearing $8.56 billion. The fund typically sustains a weighted average portfolio life of one year or less, while yielding a one-year return of 6.53%, slightly surpassing the category average of 6.51%. Its three-year return stood at 4.33%, also exceeding the category average of 3.49%.

Disclaimer : This content was produced in part with the assistance of Benzinga Neuro and was reviewed and published by Benzinga editors.

Photo by rafapress on Shutterstock

How do ⁤fees influence investor ​decision-making‌ when choosing between BlackRock’s⁢ and Texas Capital’s ETF offerings?

**Interview ‌with ‌Financial Analyst,⁣ Sarah Bennett**

**Editor:** Welcome, Sarah! With the‌ recent⁣ news about BlackRock’s proposed launch of their new ETFs, what are your initial thoughts on this move within the ⁣money market sector?

**Sarah Bennett:** Thanks​ for having me! I think it’s a ​strategic move by BlackRock, especially considering the shifting landscape ​of money market investing. By introducing the iShares Prime and Government⁤ Money Market ETFs, ​they’re trying⁤ to ‍cater to⁤ a growing demand for safer, more flexible investment options. Given ‍the SEC’s rules, these ⁣ETFs could attract investors looking for something that balances‍ safety ‍with slight ​returns.

**Editor:** Interesting! We’ve seen Texas Capital Bancshares also making ⁢headlines ​with‌ similar offerings. How do you⁢ think BlackRock’s‌ new ETFs stack up against Texas ⁤Capital’s?

**Sarah Bennett:** It’s a‍ competitive market right now; Texas Capital already​ has an established ETF that’s performing well with a⁢ modest ⁢fee. However, BlackRock has the advantage of established brand recognition and a history of lower‌ fees for their existing ETFs. ​The audience might see these new​ offerings as a safer bet with a reputable name, but pricing‍ will be​ key in this battle.

**Editor:** You mentioned fees – we noticed that BlackRock’s existing ETFs have lower fees compared to Texas Capital’s.⁣ How significant is that in the decision-making ⁢process for investors?

**Sarah Bennett:** Fees play ‍a ‍critical ⁢role, especially⁤ in the money market space where margins are thin. ⁤Lower fees can lead to better net ⁣returns for investors, which‌ is crucial when you’re dealing with shorter-term investments. If​ BlackRock manages⁤ to‌ keep fees⁢ low, they might encourage more investors to⁣ switch from or try out Texas Capital’s ETF.

**Editor:** BlackRock also liquidated two of⁣ its‌ open-end money market funds last ‍month. Do you think that decision impacts their credibility with⁤ investors?

**Sarah Bennett:** In some ways, yes! Liquidating funds can be ‌seen as a sign of prudence or a strategic retreat from products‌ that might not meet new regulatory requirements. However, it​ also raises questions about⁤ their confidence in existing offerings. If⁢ they position these new ETFs as improved options, they could regain trust, but investors will be ⁢watching ⁤closely to see how they navigate future challenges.

**Editor:** Lastly, ⁣with the overall volatility in the stock market, do you think these new ETFs ⁣will attract investors looking for stability?

**Sarah Bennett:** Absolutely.‍ A $6.3 trillion market offers substantial opportunities for investors seeking​ safety, especially during tumultuous times. The combination of short maturities​ and the ETF structure⁢ provides flexibility ‌and liquidity—appealing traits for those ‌scared⁢ off by stock market fluctuations. BlackRock and ⁢Texas Capital are right on the money with their offerings!

**Editor:** Thank you,⁣ Sarah! It’s⁢ clear there’s ‍a thrilling ride ahead in‌ the money market ETF space, and we appreciate ⁤your insights!

**Sarah Bennett:** My pleasure! I look forward to seeing how these developments unfold.

Leave a Replay