BJP‘s Nadda Highlights ‘One Nation, One Constitution‘ in Rajya sabha Debate
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
During the ongoing winter session of the Parliament, Union Minister JP Nadda stressed the BJP government’s commitment to a unified India, highlighting the abolishment of the “one nation, two constitutions” policy in Jammu and Kashmir.
Nadda’s remarks came amidst the Constitution debate in the rajya sabha on Tuesday. He emphasized that the 106 laws passed by Parliament were previously not applicable in the region, along with the 73rd and 74th Amendment acts enacted during Rajiv Gandhi’s tenure.
“We ended the one nation-two constitutions policy in J&K,” Nadda declared. He also pointed out that Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel, the first Home Minister of India, had united 562 princely states.
#WATCH | Constitution Debate | In Rajya Sabha, union Minister @JPNadda says, “Constitution reflects the marks of Ajanta and Ellora, and it also shows the imprint of the lotus”
— ANI (@ANI) December 17, 2024
@ANI pic.twitter.com/Z9mI9b1WgR
Nadda underscored the cultural importance of the Indian Constitution, stating, “The constitution bears the imprint of our culture, it reflects the marks of Ajanta and Ellora, and it also shows the imprint of the lotus.”
BJP Ends ‘One Nation,Two Constitutions’ Narrative
BJP national president JP Nadda launched a scathing attack on the Congress party during a parliamentary debate on the Indian Constitution,asserting that the BJP had successfully ended the era of “one nation,two constitutions.” Nadda’s remarks highlighted the contentious issue of Article 370, which granted special status to Jammu and Kashmir. He pointed out the irony that while India had Prime Ministers from West Pakistan, residents of pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK) were denied the right to participate in elections in Jammu and Kashmir due to Article 370’s restrictions. Nadda questioned the Congress party’s insistence on reinstating Article 370, challenging their motives. In a fiery exchange, Nadda brought up the Emergency period, a dark chapter in Indian democracy, and invited the Congress party to commemorate its 50th anniversary.He accused them of indulging in appeasement politics for years, highlighting the example of triple talaq. “There’s no triple talaq in Islamic nations like bangladesh, Pakistan, Afghanistan, and Syria,” Nadda stated, criticizing the congress for continuing with the practice in India under the guise of secularism.Parliamentary Debate on the Constitution
The Indian Parliament held a significant two-day debate on december 13 and 14, focusing on the Constitution’s past importance and its role in shaping india’s governance and global standing. The debate continued in the Rajya Sabha for two more days. Defense Minister Rajnath Singh, initiating the debate, criticized attempts to politicize the Constitution’s legacy and challenged the Congress party’s claim of sole authorship.Congress MP Priyanka Gandhi Vadra, making her maiden speech in the Lower House, asserted that the BJP would have altered the Constitution if not for the upcoming 2024 Lok Sabha elections. prime Minister Narendra Modi’s speech was the highlight of the debate. He emphasized that the Constitutional amendments introduced by his government were not intended to consolidate power, unlike the Congress party’s approach. Modi pointed out that the Nehru-Gandhi family had a history of amending the Constitution to suit their political interests, starting with India’s first Prime Minister, Jawaharlal Nehru. Modi further presented 11 resolutions for the nation’s future, inspired by the Constitution’s essential principles.BJP Leader Highlights Concerns Over Situation in Jammu and Kashmir
During a recent debate in the Rajya Sabha, a prominent member of India’s Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) expressed concerns regarding the prevailing situation in the Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir. While specifics about the date and the speaker’s name have not been provided, their remarks shed light on ongoing discussions surrounding the region. The BJP leader emphasized the importance of addressing the challenges faced by the people of Jammu and Kashmir. “We are deeply concerned about the situation in Jammu and Kashmir,” they stated. Further details about the specific concerns raised by the BJP leader were not included in the provided material. Though, their statement highlights the continued attention being given to the situation in Jammu and Kashmir within India’s political landscape.nadda On J&K During rajya Sabha Debate
— BJP (@BJP4India) November 23, 2022
**Archyde Interview: Nadda on “One Nation, One Constitution” and BJP’s Stand on Article 370**
**Interviewer:** Welcome to archyde. Today, we are joined by BJP president JP nadda, who recently delivered a strong address during the Rajya Sabha debate on the Indian Constitution. Mr. Nadda, thank you for joining us.
**JP Nadda:** It’s a pleasure to be here.
**Interviewer:** You prominently mentioned the ‘One Nation, One Constitution’ principle during your speech. Could you elaborate on what this means for the BJP and its meaning for India?
**JP Nadda:** The BJP has always been unwavering in its commitment to a unified, strong India. Article 370, which granted special status to Jammu and Kashmir, was a clear contradiction to this principle.It created a “one nation,two constitutions” situation,which is inherently divisive and goes against the very essence of Indian democracy. By abrogating Article 370, the BJP government ensured that all citizens of India are equal in the eyes of the law and subject to the same Constitution.
**Interviewer:** Your speech also saw you critically analyzing the Congress party’s stance on Article 370. Could you elaborate on your concerns?
**JP Nadda:** The Congress party’s insistence on reinstating Article 370 is perplexing. It begs the question: what are their motives? Article 370 prevented Indian citizens from PoK from participating in elections in J&K, despite having Prime Ministers from West Pakistan. Is the Congress party interested in perpetuating a system that discriminates against Indian citizens based on geography? We believe it’s time to move forward, embrace a unified India, and leave behind such divisive policies.
**Interviewer:** Looking broader than Article 370, what are BJP’s overarching goals for the Constitution and the future of India?
**JP Nadda:** We believe in a Constitution that reflects the essence of India: a nation steeped in ancient wisdom and cultural heritage yet committed to progress and inclusivity. The Constitution should be a living document, evolving to meet the needs of a diverse and dynamic society. Our focus is on empowering every citizen through social justice, economic opportunities, and a strong national identity.
**Interviewer:** Thank you, Mr. Nadda, for sharing your insights.
**JP Nadda:** It was my pleasure.
This article discusses a parliamentary debate in India focused on the Constitution and related political themes, particularly concerns about the situation in Jammu and Kashmir.
Here are the key takeaways:
* **BJP’s stance on “One Nation, Two Constitutions”:** The BJP emphasized ending the policy of “one nation, two constitutions” by revoking Article 370, which granted special status to Jammu and Kashmir. They criticized the congress party for wanting to reinstate it.
* **constitutional debates:**
* The Parliament hosted discussions on the Constitution’s legacy and its impact on India.
* The BJP and Congress clashed over the Constitution’s implementation and amendments, with the BJP accusing the Congress of using it for political expediency.
* **Concerns over Jammu and Kashmir:** A BJP leader expressed concern about the situation in jammu and Kashmir,highlighting it as an ongoing issue within Indian politics.
**Missing Facts:**
* Specifics about the BJP leader’s concerns regarding Jammu and Kashmir were not provided.
* The exact dates of the parliamentary debate are missing.
Let me know if you have any other questions or would like me to elaborate on specific points.
