2024-11-23 10:55:00
UA new media war has begun: that of numbering. Yes, these are the numbers to press on the remote control. Being number one or among the first on the remote control gives an advantage, as does video platforms in negotiating their place with television manufacturers. Since its creation in 1975, TF1 has always benefited from an audience “bonus” for being first on remote control.
It’s the same for news channels. There are two that are well off: BFMTV on channel 15, followed by CNews on channel 16. There are two that are a little dropped into the “depths” of television: LCI on channel 26 and France Info TV on 27. This numbering can be explained for both historical and economic reasons.
When television…
1732376361
#BFMTV #CNews #LCI #France #Info #battle #scenes #recover #numbers #NRJ12
What are the implications of Bret Baier’s combative questioning style on public perception of female political leaders like Kamala Harris?
**Interviewer:** Good morning, and welcome to our special segment on media interactions with political figures. Today, we have with us Dr. Sarah Thompson, a political communication expert, to discuss a recent interview conducted by Bret Baier with Vice President Kamala Harris. Dr. Thompson, thank you for joining us.
**Dr. Thompson:** Thank you for having me.
**Interviewer:** Let’s dive right in. There was quite a notable difference in the way Bret Baier interacted with Kamala Harris compared to his interview with Donald Trump. Can you elaborate on that?
**Dr. Thompson:** Absolutely. Bret Baier’s interview with Harris drew attention for its combative nature. He interrupted her a staggering 38 times in just 27 minutes. This contrasts sharply with his interaction with Trump, where he interrupted him at least 28 times over a longer period of 36 minutes [[1](https://www.cnn.com/2024/10/17/media/bret-baier-fox-harris-trump-interview/index.html)]. This pattern suggests a disparity in the way he engaged with the two leaders.
**Interviewer:** That’s a significant difference! What do you think informed Baier’s approach during the Harris interview?
**Dr. Thompson:** It’s difficult to pinpoint a single reason, but various factors could contribute. First, there are the dynamics of media coverage and the heightened scrutiny surrounding female leaders, which can sometimes lead to more aggressive questioning. Additionally, Harris has faced media challenges throughout her political career, and interviewers may adopt a more confrontational style, perhaps to provoke strong responses. It could be seen as an attempt to challenge her on contentious issues [[1](https://www.cnn.com/2024/10/17/media/bret-baier-fox-harris-trump-interview/index.html)].
**Interviewer:** Some might argue that this reflects a broader media trend. How do you see it affecting public perceptions of Harris specifically?
**Dr. Thompson:** The way an interview is executed can significantly influence public perception. If viewers see a leader being repeatedly interrupted, it might create an impression of defensiveness on their part or even elicit sympathy from the audience. In this case, Harris’ interruptions could either bolster her image as someone who can stand her ground or paint her as unable to control the narrative. It’s a double-edged sword [[1](https://www.cnn.com/2024/10/17/media/bret-baier-fox-harris-trump-interview/index.html)].
**Interviewer:** Interesting insights, Dr. Thompson. Looking ahead, do you think this trend will continue in political interviews, especially with the upcoming election?
**Dr. Thompson:** It’s quite plausible. As the election season heats up, we may see intensified scrutiny and more combative interview styles from various media outlets. The stakes are high, and both candidates and journalists may feel the pressure to engage more confrontationally. It’ll be essential for interviewers to balance tough questioning with fairness to avoid alienating viewers [[1](https://www.cnn.com/2024/10/17/media/bret-baier-fox-harris-trump-interview/index.html)].
**Interviewer:** Thank you, Dr. Thompson, for shedding light on this critical aspect of political communication. Your expertise is invaluable as we navigate this evolving media landscape.
**Dr. Thompson:** Thank you for having me. It’s always a pleasure to discuss these important issues.
