The eight months that the courtship of Benjamin Vicuna y So Sulichin, the actor tried to keep the romance away from the press. separation confirmedthe former of the China Suarez and of pampita explained why it will continue in that line.
“How are you transiting these moments following your separation?”asked the notary Intruders, Gonzalo Vázquez, to Benjamin.
Seriously, Vicuña responded forcefully: “I’m not talking regarding that, I don’t want to add things or comments to it. We’re fine.”
Immediately followingwards, the chronicler consulted him regarding his supposed anger with LAM, following Yanina Torres tell that Eli Sulichin was the one who ended the couple.
“I’m not talking regarding that, I don’t want to add things or comments to it. We’re fine.”
“Are you upset that certain data has been leakedWhat did you yourself go out to deny?” Asked the notary, following Vicuña said that the separation was by mutual agreement and that it was not just Eli’s decision.
Sharp, Benjamín Vicuña clarified: “I did not deny. I mean, everything is fine. Nothing happens. I appreciate the concern.”
THE REASONS FOR THE SEPARATION OF BENJAMÍN VICUÑA AND ELI SULICHIN
At the end of July, Yanina Torres outlined some of the reasons that led to That is, Sulich’s decide to distance yourself from Benjamín Vicuña: “He did not expect it. The issue is that they have very different lives. Benjamin is working in Chile and taking care of his father, who had some health problems.”
“There is a schedule difference… There was no discussion. She travels a lot. And she’s in love, but she chooses not to be. It’s chaotic,” Yanina said.
“There was no conflict and no fight either. The two understand each other a lot, there are no third parties. She is a smaller girl, he has many children … there was a difference in schedule, for the moment, “continued the “little angel”.
“He has children of all ages, who takes them here, there another one is little. She was in love, but with five kids it’s difficult…Eli does not have children, they are still in constant communication,” argued Latorre.
