The American journalist’s rude questions exposed America’s hypocrisy in a crowded gathering. A mirror was shown to the US State Department during the press conference.
During the press briefing, the American journalist said that Israel is now preparing to attack Iran. In July, Blanken said Iran would build a nuclear weapon in 2 weeks. On this, the journalist said, “I think that Iran must have made an atomic bomb by now.”
The American journalist said that Ukraine has carried out many attacks on Russian territories and we all know that Russia has 6,000 atomic bombs. A militia is armed against a nuclear force. This was a very dangerous case.
The American journalist said that if a nuclear war breaks out, everything that man has achieved through thousands of years of hard work will be destroyed immediately.
The American journalist also said that it is said that Putin and Khomeini are terrorists. And that they are so bad that they cannot even be talked about. The Biden administration funded the genocide in Gaza. And you come here every day and say that you are not responsible. Who gave you the right to lecture on the ethics of other countries?
Matthew Miller, the spokesperson of the US State Department, was confused by the journalist’s factual questions. He said that if you ask a question according to the policy, I will answer. On this, the American journalist said, “You are taking the risk of starting a nuclear war, so answer the questions.” Instead of answering, Matthew Miller took the question to another journalist.
#American #journalist #exposes #hypocrisy #country #World
u.s. press freedom ranking
Analysis: Unmasking America’s Hypocrisy - A Journalistic Take
A recent press conference at the US State Department has brought to the forefront a grave concern - America’s own hypocrisy. During the briefing, a journalist chose to tackle the sensitive topic head-on, pointing out the inconsistencies in the US government’s actions. This brazen confrontation laid bare the cracks in America’s self-proclaimed facade of credibility and morality.
This incident warrants attention, especially in light of recent events and reporting. As Human Rights Watch pointed out, the US has damaged its credibility due to “inconsistency and at worst hypocrisy,” particularly with regards to its stance on Gaza [1]. Furthermore, a BBC journalist took a bold stance, calling out the US on its hypocrisy on Israel, further substantiating claims of America’s duplicitous nature [2].
However, this isn’t an isolated incident limited to the realm of foreign policy. The issue runs deeper, transcending individual cases, and reflecting a broader issue within the fabric of American politics. When prominent leaders display double standards, it betrays the system and sabotages public trust. This self-evident dissonance was poignantly exemplified in a statement about the high levels of the system: “[the] hypocrisy is very apparent” [3].
What this recent event highlights is that the country’s overall stance lacks coherence, generating ripples of skepticism about America’s values and principles. We must recognize that in our world where external alliances and collaborations hold increasing importance, it is imperative that America uphold its stated principles to avoid reinforcing this conception of American hypocrisy. Until inconsistencies are rectified and true moral leadership is exhibited, such questioning may only intensify. By mirroring its flawed policies and expectations with this critical eye, we are better placed to generate an actual transformation toward the United States adopting practical and responsible decision-making.