Behind Closed Chambers: The Silent Battle for a Free Judiciary

LeIP: Judges’ struggle is not just salary but fulfillment of rights”/>
Residents sit in an empty courtroom at the Surabaya District Court, East Java, Monday (7/10/2024). A number of judges postponed the trial as a form of support for solidarity action to demand increased welfare. (ANTARA FOTO/Didik Suhartono)

Executive DIRECTOR of the Institute for the Study and Advocacy of Judicial Independence (LeIP) Muhammad Tanziel Aziezi sees that what judges are currently fighting for is not just about the salary of judges of a certain value.

However, he said, the fulfillment of judges’ financial and welfare rights has never been adjusted to current economic conditions for 12 years.

“This condition is very different from positions other than judges which receive periodic adjustments to their financial rights every year,” explained Tanziel to Media Indonesia, Tuesday (8/10).

Also read: Apart from asking for a salary increase, the judge asks the public to monitor performance

“Even though PP no. 94 of 2012 has been amended twice, namely through PP No. 74 of 2016 and PP no. 40 of 2022, however, these revisions do not regulate adjustments and improvements in the welfare of judges so they have not brought about good changes for judges,” he added.

In fact, Tanziel believes that all parties must agree that economic conditions and the value of money in 2012 were much different from today’s conditions considering that there is inflation every year.

In this way, it is almost certain that the salaries of judges in 2012 are no longer in line with current economic conditions which have an impact on the economic lives of judges and their families.

Also read: Confide in DPD, judge admits there are people who are borrowing money to return home

The problem of not having to adjust the financial rights of judges, said Tanziel, basically stems from the absence of provisions regarding the mechanism for evaluating and periodically adjusting judges’ salaries.

Without these regulations, it is almost certain that there will be no guarantee that judges’ salaries will always be adjusted to factual economic conditions, workload, and other indicators that need to be taken into account in determining judges’ salaries.

Moreover, Tanziel said that periodically adjusting the salaries of other ASNs did not affect the judges’ salaries.

Also read: Fighting for Judges’ Welfare, DPD RI Meets Minister of Finance Sri Mulyani

In fact, equalizing the salary provisions for judges with other ASNs is already a problem in itself because judges no longer serve as ASNs and therefore require separate salary provisions that are different from ASNs.

The existence of regulations that can guarantee periodic adjustments to judges’ salaries is also needed to prevent movements of judges like today from happening again in the future.

Tanziel also reminded that this movement was not the first action taken by judges to demand the fulfillment of their welfare rights.

Also read: DPR asks for mass leave of judges to end

Previously, Indonesian Judge Solidarity (SHI) spokesperson Fauzan Arrasyid said the figure had taken into account inflation and the costs of where judges served. According to him, the demand was reasonable because judges had not received a salary increase for 12 years.

“The demands of judges throughout Indonesia are that we ask for an increase of 142 percent of the existing office allowance in 2012,” said Fauzan.

Fauzan said the number of judges in Indonesia currently reaches 7 thousand people. Judges, he said, work for justice seekers, but they have not prospered without years of salary increases. (P-5)

#LeIP #Judges #struggle #salary #fulfillment #rights
Analysis: The Plight of Judges in Indonesia – A Struggle for Fulfillment of Rights

As I read the article from Media Indonesia, I was struck by the stark reality faced by judges in Indonesia. The Executive Director of the Institute for the Study and Advocacy of Judicial Independence (LeIP), Muhammad Tanziel Aziezi, shed light on the struggles of judges, which go beyond mere salary increments. The issue at hand is the fulfillment of judges’ financial and welfare rights, which have been stagnant for 12 years, despite the changing economic conditions.

According to Tanziel, the problem lies in the absence of provisions for evaluating and periodically adjusting judges’ financial rights. Despite amendments to PP No. 94 of 2012, the welfare of judges has not been adequately addressed. This is in stark contrast to other positions, which receive periodic adjustments to their financial rights every year. The impact is significant, with judges’ salaries in 2012 no longer reflecting current economic conditions, thereby affecting their economic lives and those of their families.

This news article highlights a critical issue that warrants attention. As a blog writer, I believe it is essential to analyze this topic further, considering its implications on the judiciary and the rule of law in Indonesia. To do this effectively, I would employ a content analysis approach, as outlined in a recent article on conducting blog content analysis to improve SEO [[3]].

First, I would examine the overall effectiveness of the current system for evaluating and adjusting judges’ financial rights. This would involve analyzing existing policies and regulations, such as PP No. 94 of 2012 and its amendments. Next, I would investigate the impact of stagnating judges’ salaries on the judiciary, including the effects on morale, performance, and the overall administration of justice.

Furthermore, I would also explore the perspectives of judges and other stakeholders, including their experiences, concerns, and suggestions for improving the current system. This could involve conducting interviews, surveys, or focus groups to gather data. By adopting this approach, I aim to provide a comprehensive analysis of the issue, highlighting both the problems and potential solutions.

the struggle of judges in Indonesia is a pressing concern that demands attention. By employing a rigorous content analysis approach, I hope to contribute to a deeper understanding of this issue, shedding light on the complexities and potential solutions. Ultimately, this analysis aims to inform and spark meaningful discussions among stakeholders, policymakers, and the public, with the goal of improving the welfare and independence of judges in Indonesia.

References:

[1] https://tracker.my.com/blog/web-analytics-for-news-websites-blogs-and-digital-magazines

[2] https://www.scotusblog.com/

[3] https://www.seoclarity.net/blog/how-to-conduct-blog-content-analysis

Share:

Facebook
Twitter
Pinterest
LinkedIn

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

On Key

Related Posts