Representative Ali Hassan Khalil pointed out, in a statement, commenting on what was issued by the head of the Free Patriotic Movement, MP Gibran Bassil, that “Bassil was inflated and deluded in front of the public, that someone was negotiating with him to set a book of conditions, and he continued to repeat the plays that the Lebanese are accustomed to to escape his responsibilities.”
He pointed out, “We proudly nominated Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri as a bloc to head the parliament, and we did not negotiate or ask anyone, and certainly not Bassil, to exchange votes with any site, and we are proud of the experience of the parliamentary leadership, which put this authority and its role in its true position, cooperating with powers as stipulated in the constitution.
Khalil explained, “As for the conditions he tries to set, the matter is up to him, and he is trying to delude the Lebanese that we are the ones who disrupted the criminal audit, which Berri had the honor to work on approving four laws related to it and lifting banking secrecy, and how he disrupted his team for the approval times of Capital Control.” He stopped the judicial formations, and none of the anti-corruption laws were implemented, and many other things that have plunged the country into the calamity we are living in. As for the development of the system and decentralization, everyone heard Berri’s firm position last Tuesday.
And he asked that “people answer, not us, regarding its conditions and demand from him in accounting for electricity, communications, dams and their deals,” considering that “Berry was not accustomed to negotiating from under the table over any of the sites, and he supervises them, and he never accepted from anyone to place much greater conditions on him.” What is presented, and our commitment to the people remains, with Berri, to work seriously to get the country out of the depths of crises that your reign bequeathed us as a second vice president of the republic, which brought it to the pit it is in.”
Khalil said, “With all this, and away from the method of deals, as we used to extend a hand to everyone, whom we meet with and whom we disagree, and we rely on a real partnership with all the honest parties, believing that we are in front of an opportunity to organize our differences and expand the common between us in order to save our country from its problems.” .
