2024-11-21 01:48:00
governor of buenos aires Axel Kisilov today questioned Javier Mire’s government for not protecting the country’s sovereignty and stressed that its “importance” goes beyond what the “traitors who rule us” say. Kisilov also criticized the privatization of Siderovia, stating that it violated the constitution and acknowledged this feeling ‘Ashamed’ of ‘the surrender we witnessed’while presiding over National Sovereignty Day events at the “Batalla Vuelta de Obligado” monument in San Pedro.
“National sovereignty is extremely important and sensitive for our people,” Kisilov posited, adding: “Say what they say, do what they do, traitors rule”. “I told Mire: We must protect the country’s production and jobs. (Donald) Trump and half the world understand thisThe major powers, they want to hand over their hands to us,” he questioned.
Likewise, he describes Millais as “Figureti” tried to “pass millionaires” but they “brought nothing to the country” and abandon “Latin American solidarity”. “The desire for characters, for become famous, become famousWe pass millionaires and they bring us nothing,” he scolded the president, saying he did it “to attract attention because it has no rational explanation, no explanation based on national interest. .
Dictators don’t like this
The practice of professional and critical journalism is a fundamental pillar of democracy. That’s why it bothers those who think they have the truth.
“We oppose Milei’s abandonment of the region and consider it a betrayal of sovereignty,” Kisilov said. “These policies implemented by Milei are Untimely and inadequate, because today the world defends its production, jobs and sovereignty and we are facing an era of nationalism”. The President of Buenos Aires hosted the event together with Vice Governor Veronica Magario; as well as Buenos Aires Provincial Health Minister Nicolás Kreplak and Infrastructure and Public Services Minister Gabriel Katopodis .
Kisilov opposes privatization of Hidrovia and Aerolineas Argentinas
Government launches tender for waterways on Wednesdayvia the Deputy Secretariat of Navigation Ports. Chief of Staff Guillermo Francos said yesterday that this “involves a significant modernization of waterway management, thereby About 80% of Argentina’s foreign trade flows”. In other words, private actors will be responsible for this modernization, and the state will also exercise a series of controls on this concession.
“We are facing the Paraná River, and what better place than here to talk about the so-called supply ships they have been threatening to launch for the main navigable waterway. Our country’s constitution says it very clearly: Article 124 says, it corresponds to the provinces The original scope of existing natural resources in my country”, the governor introduced today during an event in San Pedro.
“Our territory, our rivers. Milei can’t take it private.“We will not turn our backs on the provinces, and we will take action against constitutional violations,” he said, anticipating a possible judicial presentation. “The province of Buenos Aires will not allow the transfer of Argentine sovereignty and knows that This country is not for sale“, he defined.
Axel Kicillof: “States don’t move like markets” Kisilov asks for job magdalena la gale canal and announced that they will present a project in the Buenos Aires Legislature, declaring that this construction is in the interest of the province, as they guarantee that “it is increasing efficiency, competitiveness, more production, more jobs, but it Sovereignty is being restored, not for our province, but for Argentina as a whole. “If they are not going to do it, the province of Buenos Aires will do it”he insisted.
“Today, for some, the river is called the Hidrovian River; for us, the river is called the main navigable waterway; for our history, the river is called For the Paraná River. The Paraná River dispute that occurred at that time is actually one of the central axes that explains the history of Argentina.” Kisilov analyzed, comparing the current situation with the Battle of Buertad Obrigado.
“Where products made on our soil will leave and enter, and where foreign trade will take place, may seem like a 19th century debate, but believe me, We are immersed in the discussion of the same chapter today”, he added further: “The intention was to seek what they called free navigation of the river. If it is to plunder Argentines, what kind of freedom can they talk about? They call him freedom but really they make us slaves”.
“We believe that the discussions between the Unitarians and the Federalists are from another century and now they want to take everything from the provinces and leave it in the 20 neighborhoods of Buenos Airesin the city and on the ship. Unitarians, centralists…same struggle,” he pointed out. He also criticized ” malvinas career and her defense of Mrs Thatcher” and her refusal to join the BRICS. “You have to be stupid and have Absolutely erroneous and obtuse ideological blinders So much damage to Argentina. We will continue to demand it and as soon as we can, we will reverse it,” he promised.
Finally, the Governor of Buenos Aires expressed his disapproval of what he described as “yet another attempt to undersell and Aerolineas Argentinas privatization“You have to have a very narrow view, or be a liar, to confirm that the advantages of owning a flagship airline can only be reflected on the company’s balance sheet,” he said, emphasizing: “A country doesn’t move like a market.”
machine learning
1732158508
#Axel #Kicillof #calls #Javier #Milei #vendepatria #figureti #opposes #Hidrovías #privatization
What are the implications of privatization policies on provincial control over resources according to Governor Kisilov?
**Interview with Axel Kisilov, Governor of Buenos Aires**
**Interviewer:** Good afternoon, Governor Kisilov. Thank you for joining us today. You recently voiced strong concerns about national sovereignty in light of the government’s decisions regarding the Paraná River and the privatization of resources. Can you elaborate on your views regarding national sovereignty and the role of the provinces?
**Axel Kisilov:** Good afternoon, and thank you for having me. National sovereignty is essential for our people, and it’s something that goes beyond political disagreements. The decisions we make regarding our natural resources, like the Paraná River, are crucial not just for Buenos Aires but for Argentina as a whole. When I say “traitors rule,” I mean that we need leaders who prioritize the welfare of our citizenry over foreign interests.
**Interviewer:** You’ve criticized the government’s approach to these resources, especially regarding privatization. What specific policies do you find most troubling?
**Axel Kisilov:** One significant concern is the privatization of key infrastructures such as Hidrovia. This violates our constitution, which states that natural resources belong to the provinces. We cannot let private interests dictate how our rivers are managed, especially when these resources play a vital role in our foreign trade and local economies.
**Interviewer:** You mentioned plans to submit a project concerning the Magdalena Canal. How do you envision this project contributing to the province and the country?
**Axel Kisilov:** The Magdalena Canal project is about restoring sovereignty and ensuring that we have full control over our navigable waterways. By modernizing and managing this waterway, we aim to increase efficiency, competitiveness, and job creation. If the federal government won’t take action, then Buenos Aires will step in to ensure these crucial developments happen.
**Interviewer:** You’ve compared the current situation to historical conflicts, such as the Battle of Vuelta de Obligado. Can you explain how history informs your stance today?
**Axel Kisilov:** Absolutely. The Paraná River’s controversies present an echo of past conflicts over sovereignty and control of resources. Today’s discussions of “free navigation” often mask a capture of our resources for foreign benefit. We cannot allow history to repeat itself where Argentines are exploited under the guise of freedom. Our sovereignty and our ability to control our resources are paramount.
**Interviewer:** You’ve also taken a stance against President Milei, stating that his policies are a betrayal of sovereignty. How do you respond to those who argue that globalization demands such policies?
**Axel Kisilov:** While globalization is a reality, it should not come at the expense of our local production and labor. Countries around the world are increasingly focused on protecting their sovereignty and industries. The policies being proposed by Milei are outdated and unsuitable. Our priority has to be safeguarding our jobs, our resources, and ultimately, our sovereignty.
**Interviewer:** Thank you for sharing your insights, Governor Kisilov. As these discussions continue, it’s clear that the issues of sovereignty and resource control will remain at the forefront of national dialogue.
**Axel Kisilov:** Thank you for having me. It’s vital that we keep these conversations going. Our future depends on it.