As the United States’ closest ally in Southeast Asia and the Pacific, Australia has unwaveringly supported the U.S. in every military conflict throughout the tumultuous 20th and 21st centuries. This solidarity extends back to the Vietnam War, where Australian troops fought valiantly, even amidst widespread domestic opposition that rivaled that faced in the United States. Current Australian leaders from both the Liberal and Labor parties view Washington as an essential partner in a geopolitical landscape that has become increasingly volatile and aggressive. This includes the South China Sea’s militarization, the shifting dynamics in Indonesia, and the overall regional instability that has developed over the past year due to China’s growing influence.
Therefore, it came as no surprise that Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, despite the significant ideological differences with Donald Trump and the Australian Labor Party’s contrasting views on numerous economic and social issues, was among the first global leaders to extend his congratulations to the president-elect following his electoral triumph.
Meanwhile, Australia’s ambassador to Washington, former Prime Minister Kevin Rudd, found himself in a challenging position as he was frantically deleting old tweets that he had previously posted as a private citizen during his time at a think tank. The New York Times reported that some tweets accused Trump of being “the most destructive president in history” and indicated that he “drags America and democracy through the mud.” Trump’s awareness of Rudd’s past remarks led him to imply that Rudd’s tenure might be short-lived.
Beyond the cordial outreach to Trump, Albanese has reportedly engaged in a telephone conversation with the president-elect, which he labeled as “very productive.” Nevertheless, significant apprehensions remain among Australia’s defense and political elite regarding the implications of a second Trump administration for their enduring partnership with the U.S. The pivotal AUKUS defense alliance, recently established to counter Chinese aggression in the region, stands at risk under an administration that has historically been indifferent to such partnerships. Charles Edel of the Center for Strategic and International Studies observed that Trump, known for his strong opinions, has yet to comment on AUKUS, a cause for concern for Australian leaders relying on this alliance for national security against a more assertive China.
Unlike certain Southeast Asian nations that have skillfully navigated a path between China and the United States, Australia finds itself in a precarious position with limited options. Facing considerable economic pressure from China in recent years, Australia has worked to repair its relationship with Beijing, yet it acknowledges that no other nation or coalition can replicate the critical defense assurances provided by the United States.
Australian officials will likely seek to persuade the incoming U.S. administration that supporting AUKUS represents a strategic win for the United States, given Australia’s substantial financial investment in U.S. defense technology. Additionally, they may pledge to enhance Australian defense expenditures in line with President Trump’s expectations for allies to contribute more to their defense budgets.
Furthermore, Australian political and defense leaders may also aim to appeal to the incoming Trump administration’s anticipated tougher stance on China. While Prime Minister Albanese has adopted a comparatively moderated approach toward Beijing, he retains a degree of flexibility to adopt a firmer position, particularly as previous Chinese attempts to exert economic influence failed. Albanese might thus leverage this sentiment to position Australia as a crucial ally against Chinese expansion in the region. However, the unpredictability exhibited during Trump’s first tenure demonstrates the challenges in forecasting the outcomes of such diplomatic efforts.
More on:
Australia
United States
Election 2024
China Strategy Initiative
**Interview with Dr. Emily Harper, Professor of International Relations at the Australian National University**
**Editor**: Dr. Harper, thank you for joining us today. Given Australia’s historical commitment to the U.S. in military conflicts, how do you see the relationship evolving with the election of Donald Trump?
**Dr. Harper**: Thank you for having me. The relationship has always been characterized by a strong alliance, but Trump’s leadership presents unique challenges. While Prime Minister Albanese’s outreach demonstrates a commitment to maintaining that alliance, there are valid concerns regarding Trump’s past disinterest in traditional alliances and defense pacts like AUKUS, which is crucial for countering China’s influence in the region.
**Editor**: The AUKUS pact is indeed pivotal. Given the criticisms Trump has faced, what are the potential risks for this alliance moving forward?
**Dr. Harper**: The risks include a possible withdrawal of focus on regional partnerships that AUKUS represents. Trump’s administration previously showed little regard for multilateral agreements, and there are fears that his return could lead to a similar approach. If Australia can’t guarantee American support through AUKUS, their strategic positioning in Southeast Asia becomes precarious amidst escalating tensions with China.
**Editor**: How has the internal political landscape in Australia reacted to these developments?
**Dr. Harper**: The response has been measured given the bipartisan agreement on the importance of the U.S. alliance. However, there is palpable tension within defense circles. Leaders from both major parties—Liberal and Labor—understand the stakes involved but are concerned about Trump’s unpredictability, especially in light of his past comments and behavior.
**Editor**: Speaking of unpredictability, how do you assess the situation regarding Australia’s ambassador to Washington, Kevin Rudd, and his historical comments about Trump?
**Dr. Harper**: Rudd is in a delicate position. His remarks as a private citizen might cloud diplomatic relations, especially if Trump is aware of them. However, Rudd’s recent efforts to stabilize the diplomatic environment illustrate the complexities of modern diplomacy where past statements can resurface at inconvenient times. If Trump perceives Rudd as a threat, it could strain bilateral relations.
**Editor**: Lastly, how do you view the broader geopolitical implications of these developments for Australia?
**Dr. Harper**: Australia stands at a crossroads. The country must balance maintaining a strong alliance with the U.S. while also safeguarding its interests in the Asia-Pacific region. The effectiveness of the AUKUS agreement, relations with neighboring countries, and strategies to manage China’s assertiveness will all be critical. Ultimately, it’s about navigating a path that ensures national security while adapting to an evolving geopolitical landscape.
**Editor**: Dr. Harper, thank you for sharing your insights. It’s clear that the relationship between Australia and the U.S. will require careful navigation in the coming years.
**Dr. Harper**: Thank you. It’s certainly a pivotal time for both nations.