Auckland Builder Fined After Botched Home Build Leaves Couple with Hefty Bills
An Auckland couple is reeling after a protracted and mismanaged home construction project, leading to financial strain and a formal complaint against teh builder.
An Auckland builder, Craig O’Brien, has been censured and fined $1700 by the Building Practitioners Board after a project went awry, leaving clients Deborah and Basil Richards with significant financial burdens. The Richards contracted O’Brien to build their home, but the project ran three years behind schedule, and they were hit with an additional $72,000 charge for “labor and materials.”
Photo: 123rf.com
The situation worsened when the Richards faced a $130,000 bill from contractors required to complete the job after O’Brien’s departure. Despite O’Brien’s promise to repay the contractor costs, the Richards have only recovered a fraction of the amount owed.
Adding insult to injury, the Building Practitioners Board decision revealed that O’Brien allegedly constructed a two-bedroom extension on his own home during this period. This revelation has fueled the Richards’ frustration and sense of injustice.
The Richards filed a complaint with the Building Practitioners Board, which has the authority to suspend or revoke a Licensed Building Practitioner’s license.However, the board opted for a less severe penalty: a $1700 fine and a censure for violating the profession’s Code of Ethics.
deborah Richards expressed her dissatisfaction with the penalty, deeming it “weak.”
“To me, it’s sort of like, if this was America we could sue him and there’d be consequences,”
Deborah Richards
She added, “But there’s no consequences in this country.”
Project Delays and Financial Strain
The Richards contracted O’Brien to complete their home in Auckland, with an initial completion date set for March 2021. However, the project wasn’t finished until April 2024, with the assistance of external contractors. Even then, Deborah Richards stated that the home still needed additional work to meet code requirements.
The extensive delays caused the Richards to lose a potential buyer and subsequent rental income.During the construction, O’Brien charged the Richards an extra $72,000 for labor and materials, citing price fluctuations but failing to provide supporting invoices or documentation.
When contractors were brought in to finish the project at a cost of $130,000 to the Richards,O’Brien agreed to repay them in $10,000 monthly installments. however, he only paid $21,000 before his company, building Labour Solutions Limited, went into receivership.
According to the Companies Office, O’Brien owes creditors $188,000.
“Now he’s liquidated and will get away scot-free,”
deborah Richards
She lamented: “He just gets to walk away.”
Building Practitioners Board Ruling
The Building Practitioners Board acknowledged that it’s investigation was limited because much of O’Brien’s conduct occurred before the Code of Ethics became fully enforceable at the end of 2022. However, the code mandates that licensed builders act in good faith, deal fairly and honestly with clients, and honor their promises.
“The old days are gone. More is now expected of Licensed Building Practitioners,”
Building Practitioners Board
The board concluded: “Looking at the respondent’s [O’Brien] conduct objectively, the board finds that the respondent has not acted in good faith.”
The board noted that O’Brien entered into an agreement to repay the contracting costs but allegedly used funds to build a two-bedroom extension on his own property.
“there was a pattern … of disingenuous conduct in relation to financial matters,”
Building Practitioners Board
The board added: “The respondent claimed cost fluctuations without substantiating them and potentially used funds he was not entitled to for his own benefit.”
There are reports of at least one other complaint against O’Brien’s conduct before the board, with findings yet to be released. O’Brien did not respond to requests for comment.
Implications for Homeowners in the U.S.
While this case occurred in Auckland, the lessons are directly applicable to homeowners in the United States. Construction disputes are common, and understanding your rights and how to protect yourself is crucial. Key takeaways include:
- Thorough Vetting: Always thoroughly vet contractors before hiring. Check references, licenses, and insurance. Online reviews can be helpful, but also verify their authenticity.
- Detailed Contracts: ensure you have a complete contract that outlines the scope of work, payment schedule, and a clear process for handling disputes. In the U.S., consult with a construction attorney to ensure your contract complies with local and state laws.
- Secure Payment Methods: Consider using escrow services for large sums of money, as this protects your funds until specific milestones are met.
- Regular Communication: Maintain open and regular communication with your contractor. Document all conversations and agreements in writing.
- Legal Recourse: In the U.S., homeowners have several legal options in cases of contractor misconduct, including breach of contract lawsuits, mechanic’s liens, and complaints to state licensing boards.
The Auckland case highlights the importance of holding contractors accountable and the need for robust consumer protection mechanisms. While the Richards felt the penalty was insufficient, their willingness to come forward can potentially prevent similar situations from happening to others.
what systemic changes could help prevent future cases of botched home builds and protect consumers?
Interview: Consumer Advocate, Sarah mcmillan, on Auckland Builder Fined After Botched Home Build
Archyde News Editor: Sarah, thank you for joining us today to discuss the recent case of the Auckland builder who was fined after a disastrous home build.Can you provide some context for our readers about the importance of this case?
Sarah McMillan: Certainly. This case highlights the vulnerabilities homeowners face when dealing with unscrupulous builders.It underscores the importance of due diligence, robust contracts, and the need for more effective consumer protections, particularly in instances of construction fraud or gross mismanagement, as seen in this Auckland case.
Archyde News Editor: The homeowner,Deborah richards,expressed disappointment with the relatively light penalty.From a consumer advocacy outlook,how does the $1700 fine and censure measure up against the financial damage the Richards experienced?
Sarah McMillan: Frankly,it’s inadequate. While censure acts as a mark against the builder’s professional record, the fine is a drop in the bucket compared to the $72,000 extra charged, the $130,000 in finishing costs, the loss of potential rental income, and other damages suffered by the Richards. It sends a message that the consequences for this kind of behaviour are not severe enough to act as a real deterrent. We need stronger enforcement mechanisms to protect consumers and prevent repeat incidents.
Archyde News Editor: The Building Practitioners Board stated that O’Brien allegedly used funds for his own benefit while the project was ongoing. In your opinion, how does this impact the case and consumer trust?
Sarah McMillan: That substantially elevates the severity of the situation.That kind of conduct, if proven true, is a blatant breach of trust and a violation of professional ethics. It completely erodes consumer confidence in the building industry and highlights the necessity for rigorous oversight and stricter auditing practices to ensure builders are handling client funds responsibly. Building fraud like this is sadly more common than many realize.
Archyde News Editor: Looking beyond New Zealand, what key takeaways can homeowners in the U.S. learn from this case to protect themselves against similar occurrences, and considering the implication for homeowners in a case like this?
Sarah McMillan: The lessons are global. First, thorough vetting is crucial. americans planning a construction project need to check references, verify builder licenses, and ensure the builder has adequate insurance. Second, detailed, legally sound contracts are essential. Every aspect of the project, including payment schedules and dispute resolution processes, must be clearly defined. Third, consider using escrow services and monitor construction progress closely. Document everything in writing. Regular detailed interaction between homeowner and builder is essential. If problems arise,homeowners in the U.S. should consult with a construction attorney instantly.
Archyde News Editor: The article mentions the Builder’s limited’s receivership. How can homeowners better protect themselves when a builder faces financial difficulties during a project?
Sarah McMillan: Carefully crafted contracts are critical. A detailed payment schedule tied to project milestones can definitely help. The use of surety bonds from the builder can also provide extra security, but those are relatively common, more so for government projects. Always get all writen, and if problems arise, consider consulting legal advice before paying more.
Archyde News Editor: Many readers might feel that the penalties in this Auckland case were insufficient. What systemic changes do you think could help prevent future cases of botched home builds and protect consumers?
Sarah McMillan: Several things. Stronger penalties, including potential license revocation, should be the norm for serious breaches of conduct.More frequent independent audits of builder finances. Enhanced consumer education about their rights and responsibilities. Mandatory professional liability insurance, that would cover issues for clients when things go wrong. And, of course, making it easier for consumers to seek redress through legal means, and better funding for government consumer protection bodies, and more stringent vetting of contractors.
Archyde News Editor: what is the most important piece of advice you would give to someone planning a home build or renovation?
Sarah McMillan: Do your homework. Don’t rush the decision. Choose your builder as carefully as you would choose a doctor or a lawyer. And remember the law: if it seems too good to be true, it probably is. Always insist on a comprehensive contract and maintain constant vigilance throughout the project. Never take anything on face value. Ask for everything in writing and be prepared to seek legal advice if something doesn’t sit right, as the Richards in Auckland did.
Archyde News Editor: Sarah, this has been insightful. Thank you for sharing your expertise.
Sarah McMillan: My pleasure.
