INVESTIGATORS at the Deputy Attorney General for Special Crimes (JAM-Pidsus) at the Attorney General’s Office named Ronald Tannur’s mother, Meirizka Widjaja, as a suspect. He is the fifth suspect in the development of a criminal conspiracy case related to bribery and/or gratification regarding the handling of the murder case by the murder defendant Ronald Tannur.
“Today, Monday (4/11), the JAM-Pidsus investigative team has carried out a marathon examination of witness MW, namely the parents or mother of the convict Ronald Tannur, which was carried out at the East Java Prosecutor’s Office,” said the Director of JAM-Pidsus Investigations. Attorney General Abdul Qohar at the AGO Complex, Jakarta, Monday (4/11).
According to Qohar, Meirizka played a role in giving Rp. 1.5 billion to Ronald’s lawyer, Lisa Rachmat, to handle Ronald’s trial at the Surabaya District Court. He said that Meirizka and Lisa had known each other for a long time because Ronald and Lisa’s children had gone to the same school.
JAM-Pidsus investigators immediately detained Meirizka for 20 days as part of an investigation at the Class 1 Detention Center of the East Java Prosecutor’s Office branch.
Meirizka was charged with Article 5 paragraph (1) or Article 6 paragraph (1) letter a in conjunction with Article 18 of the Corruption Law in conjunction with Article 55 paragraph (1) 1st of the Criminal Code. (Tri/M-4)
#Attorney #General #Names #Ronald #Tannurs #Mother #Meirizka #Widjaja #Suspect
**Interview with Dr. Emily Thompson, AI Ethics Researcher**
**Editor**: Welcome, Dr. Thompson! Today we’re discussing the recent experiment where an AI was tasked with acting as a reporter. What are your thoughts on the implications of AI in journalism?
**Dr. Thompson**: Thank you for having me! The introduction of AI in journalism certainly raises fascinating questions. On one hand, AI can increase efficiency and provide quick access to data. However, it also risks oversimplifying narratives and potentially spreading misinformation if not supervised properly.
**Editor**: Interesting point. In the case of the AI reporter, it pitched multiple stories and received feedback from an AI editor. How do you think this dynamic affects the quality of journalism?
**Dr. Thompson**: It’s a double-edged sword. The ability to pitch stories based on data analysis might uncover topics that human reporters might overlook. However, the creativity and intuition of human journalists are irreplaceable. Stories often need a human touch to explore emotional depths and societal impacts—something AI might struggle with.
**Editor**: Speaking of human touch, do you think the public will accept AI-generated news as credible, or is there a limit to its acceptance?
**Dr. Thompson**: Trust is a significant factor in journalism. The public may be wary of entirely AI-generated content due to concerns over bias and accuracy. Transparency about how stories are generated will be crucial in building that trust. Audiences still gravitate toward authentic narratives created by humans.
**Editor**: You bring up a valid concern regarding bias. How can we ensure that AI in journalism is used responsibly?
**Dr. Thompson**: Rigorous oversight is key. Media organizations must implement ethical guidelines and maintain a human editorial presence. Ensuring diversity in AI training data and employing fact-checking mechanisms can help mitigate biases in AI-generated content.
**Editor**: do you foresee a future where AI and human journalists collaborate more closely?
**Dr. Thompson**: Absolutely! A hybrid approach could be the most beneficial, where AI handles data-driven tasks and human journalists focus on storytelling, ethical implications, and investigative reporting. This collaboration can enhance the overall quality and accessibility of news.
**Editor**: Thank you, Dr. Thompson, for your insights! It’s clear that while AI can play a role in journalism, the human element remains vital.
