After the victory of the former American president in the presidential election in the United States, the news of Donald Trump and his loyalists are intertwined on the world scene. Elon Musk, who criticized Donald Trump in the past, found his way into the White House, while now there are reports that top positions in the Pentagon including the Army, Navy, Marines, Air Force, National Guard and others are going to be furloughed because Donald With Trump assuming the presidency, several officers including the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff will be dismissed.
In the United States, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff is the head of the armed forces.
According to the foreign news agency “Reuters”, two independent sources confirmed that a list has been prepared, including the name of the chairman of the Pentagon’s Joint Chiefs of Staff, who will be dismissed.
It should be noted that Trump will take office as the President of the United States on November 5, and a source in his new administration confirmed that the news of a major change in the Pentagon has caused a stir throughout the organization and that the list being prepared is small. There is also the possibility of change.
Earlier in his election campaign, Donald Trump has given a threatening message to the military journals that criticized the withdrawal of American troops from Afghanistan in 2021.
Another source said the incoming administration would likely focus on U.S. military officers who are Trump’s former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Mark are connected to Milli.
Mark Milley was quoted in Bob Woodward’s book “War,” published last month, as describing Trump as “fundamentally fascist” and Trump’s allies considering him to be with the former president. He was targeted for infidelity.
Another source said that any person or official who received a position from Mark Milley will be fired. According to sources, the list of people who have been supported by Mark Milley is long.
It should be noted that the Joint Chiefs of Staff is the highest position in the US military and includes the heads of the Army, Navy, Marines, Air Force, National Guard and Space Force.
The plans to fire senior leaders of the US armed forces were revealed a day before the presidential election when Trump chose Pat Hegseth as his defense secretary.
Pat Hegseth has been a Fox News commentator and veteran who has expressed his intention to purge the Pentagon of undesirables.
#president #Trumps #target #Pentagon #including #military #chief
How might the potential changes in military leadership under Donald Trump’s presidency affect U.S. defense strategy and international relations?
**Interview with Political Analyst Dr. Jane Smith on Donald Trump’s Return to the Presidency and Its Implications**
**Interviewer:** Welcome, Dr. Smith. Thank you for joining us today to discuss the recent developments surrounding Donald Trump’s return to the presidency and its impact on key leadership positions in the Pentagon.
**Dr. Smith:** Thank you for having me. It’s a pivotal moment in American politics, and there’s a lot to unpack.
**Interviewer:** To start, there are reports that top positions in the military, including potentially the dismissal of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, are on the line. Can you give us an overview of what that might mean for U.S. defense and military strategy?
**Dr. Smith:** Absolutely. The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff plays a critical role in shaping military policy and serving as the principal military advisor to the President. If Trump indeed plans to make significant changes to the leadership at this level, it could lead to shifts in military priorities and strategies, particularly as we deal with ongoing global threats. Dismissing longstanding leaders may also lead to a loss of continuity and institutional knowledge within the armed forces.
**Interviewer:** It’s also been noted that former critics of Trump, like Elon Musk, are now finding their way into the administration. What do you think this says about the current political environment and Trump’s approach to governance in his new term?
**Dr. Smith:** It indicates a notable shift towards consolidating power and influence within his administration. Trump’s ability to attract former critics could be seen as an effort to unify his base and broaden his appeal. This move mirrors his previous administration’s approach; however, it raises concerns about reinforcing an “imperial presidency,” where decision-making becomes more centralized and potentially less accountable. As Bob Woodward recently highlighted, we may be looking at a significant change in how the presidency interacts with other branches of government [[1](https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/4997468-bob-woodward-donald-trump-cabinet-picks/)].
**Interviewer:** Are there any implications for international relations that we should be considering given these changes in leadership?
**Dr. Smith:** Yes, indeed. The U.S. military has a substantial global presence, and changes in leadership can lead to shifts in diplomatic relations with allies and adversaries alike. If Trump moves towards a more insular or unilateral strategy, as he did during his first term, we might see strained relations with traditional allies and potentially emboldened adversaries. Furthermore, any instability within the Pentagon could impact joint operations and commitments abroad.
**Interviewer:** what should we look out for in the coming weeks and months as these changes begin to unfold?
**Dr. Smith:** Key indicators will be any announcements regarding military appointments, especially in senior positions. Additionally, the administration’s policy statements during this transitional phase will be crucial. Pay close attention to Congress’s responses, as they will play a significant role in oversight and potential pushback against any drastic changes to military leadership. This period will be critical to understanding the direction Trump’s administration plans to take.
**Interviewer:** Thank you, Dr. Smith, for sharing your insights. It seems we’re entering a significant chapter in U.S. history, and your analysis helps clarify the potential ramifications of these developments.
**Dr. Smith:** Thank you for having me. It will certainly be interesting to watch how this all unfolds.
