After the victory of the former American president in the presidential election in the United States, the news of Donald Trump and his loyalists are intertwined on the world scene. Elon Musk, who criticized Donald Trump in the past, found his way into the White House, while now there are reports that top positions in the Pentagon, such as the Army, Navy, Marines, Air Force, National Guard, etc., are going to be furloughed because Donald With Trump assuming the presidency, several officers including the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff will be dismissed.
In the United States, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff is the head of the armed forces.
According to the foreign news agency “Reuters”, two independent sources confirmed that a list has been prepared, including the name of the chairman of the Pentagon’s Joint Chiefs of Staff, who will be dismissed.
It should be noted that Trump will take office as the President of the United States on November 5, and a source in his new administration confirmed that the news of a major change in the Pentagon has caused a stir throughout the organization and that the list being prepared is small. There is also the possibility of change.
Earlier in his election campaign, Donald Trump has given a threatening message to those military journals that criticized the withdrawal of American troops from Afghanistan in 2021.
Another source said the incoming administration would likely focus on U.S. military officers linked to Trump’s former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Mark Milley.
Mark Milley was quoted in Bob Woodward’s book “War,” published last month, in which Trump was described as “fundamentally fascist” and Trump’s allies considered him to be with the former president. He was targeted for infidelity.
Another source said that any person or official who received a position from Mark Milley will be fired. According to sources, the list of people who have been supported by Mark Milley is long.
It should be noted that the Joint Chiefs of Staff is the highest position in the US military and includes the heads of the Army, Navy, Marines, Air Force, National Guard and Space Force.
Plans to fire senior U.S. armed forces leaders were revealed a day before the presidential election when Trump named his Defense Secretary Pat Hegseth. selected
Pat Hegseth has been a Fox News commentator and veteran who has expressed his intention to purge the Pentagon of undesirables.
#president #Trumps #target #Pentagon #including #military #chief
What are the potential impacts of Trump’s directives on the military’s operational readiness and leadership stability?
**Interview with Military Analyst, Dr. Emily Carter**
**Host:** Welcome, Dr. Carter. Thank you for joining us today to discuss the recent developments regarding Donald Trump’s directives to the Pentagon and the potential implications of his presidency on the military leadership.
**Dr. Carter:** Thank you for having me. It’s a pleasure to be here.
**Host:** Let’s dive right in. The released transcripts indicate that Trump directed senior Pentagon leadership to take measures to ensure a peaceful January 6th. Would you say these directives were adequate, given the circumstances that unfolded that day?
**Dr. Carter:** In hindsight, the directives seem insufficient. While calling for a peaceful demonstration and suggesting support from the National Guard was a step in the right direction, the execution and communication of those orders appear to have been lacking. It raises questions about whether those directives were fully embraced or merely acknowledged.
**Host:** Indeed. With reports suggesting potential furloughs or dismissals within the Pentagon under Trump’s new administration, including the Chief of Staff, what could this mean for military stability?
**Dr. Carter:** If trusted leaders are abruptly removed or sidelined, it can create a vacuum of experienced leadership. Such disruptions can result in a critical period of adjustment—one that may challenge the military’s operational readiness and morale. Additionally, loyalists in key military positions could lead to significant shifts in policy and protocols.
**Host:** Some speculate that Trump’s return to the presidency might result in a more militarized approach to governance. How do you see this affecting civil-military relations?
**Dr. Carter:** There is always concern when political leaders seek closer ties with military personnel. If military action becomes a primary tool for addressing national issues, it could blur the lines between civilian authority and military power, which is a delicate balance in a democracy. Civil-military relations rely heavily on trust, and undermining that could lead to long-term ramifications.
**Host:** What steps could be taken to ensure that the military retains its independence and remains apolitical amidst these changes?
**Dr. Carter:** Strong institutional norms and adherence to the Constitution are vital. It’s essential that military leaders articulate their commitment to civilian oversight and prioritize their duties to the nation as a whole over loyalty to any political figure. Regular engagement between military leaders and civilian leaders can also help reinforce these principles.
**Host:** what do you think the American public should be most aware of as these developments continue to unfold?
**Dr. Carter:** It’s crucial for the public to remain informed about the changes in military leadership and the decisions that may arise from them. Understanding the implications of such shifts is important for assessing how national security could be affected and what it means for democracy itself. Vigilance and transparency are key.
**Host:** Thank you, Dr. Carter, for those insights. It’s clear that the intersection of politics and military operations will remain a significant topic of discussion moving forward.
**Dr. Carter:** Thank you for having me. It’s an important conversation to have, and I look forward to seeing how it evolves.
**Host:** That’s it for today’s interview. Stay tuned for more updates on this and other pressing national issues.