After the victory of the former American president in the presidential election in the United States, the news of Donald Trump and his loyalists are intertwined on the world scene. Elon Musk, who criticized Donald Trump in the past, found his way into the White House, while now there are reports that top positions in the Pentagon including the Army, Navy, Marines, Air Force, National Guard and others are going to be furloughed because Donald With Trump assuming the presidency, several officers including the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff will be dismissed.
In the United States, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff is the head of the armed forces.
According to the foreign news agency “Reuters”, two independent sources confirmed that a list has been prepared, including the name of the chairman of the Pentagon’s Joint Chiefs of Staff, who will be dismissed.
It should be noted that Trump will take office as the President of the United States on November 5, and a source in his new administration confirmed that the news of a major change in the Pentagon has caused a stir throughout the organization and that the list being prepared is small. There is also the possibility of change.
Earlier in his election campaign, Donald Trump has given a threatening message to those military journals that criticized the withdrawal of American troops from Afghanistan in 2021.
Another source said the incoming administration would likely focus on U.S. military officers linked to Trump’s former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Mark Milley.
Mark Milley was quoted in Bob Woodward’s book “War,” published last month, in which Trump was described as “fundamentally fascist” and Trump’s allies considered him to be with the former president. He was targeted for infidelity.
Another source said that any person or official who received a position on Mark Milley’s behalf would be fired. The list is long who have been supported by Mark Milley.
It should be noted that the Joint Chiefs of Staff is the highest rank in the US military and includes the heads of the Army, Navy, Marines, Air Force, National Guard and Space Force.
The plans to fire senior leaders of the US armed forces were revealed a day before the presidential election when Trump chose Pat Hegseth as his defense secretary.
Pat Hegseth has been a Fox News commentator and veteran who has expressed his intention to purge the Pentagon of undesirables.
#president #Trumps #target #Pentagon #including #military #chief
How might Trump’s potential military leadership changes affect international relations and defense commitments?
**Interview with Political Analyst Sarah Mitchell on Trump’s Return and Its Implications for U.S. Military Leadership**
**Editor:** Thank you for joining us today, Sarah. There’s a lot of news surrounding Donald Trump’s return to the presidency and its implications for U.S. military leadership. Can you shed some light on how this might affect the Pentagon?
**Sarah Mitchell:** Absolutely, thank you for having me. With Trump back in the White House, we can expect significant changes in military leadership, particularly with reports of potential furloughs and dismissals among top military officials. The position of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff is particularly critical, and his dismissal could lead to a ripple effect across the armed forces.
**Editor:** What do you think are the motivations behind these reported changes in military leadership?
**Sarah Mitchell:** Trump has historically favored loyalty and alignment with his agenda. By potentially replacing senior military leaders with individuals who are more aligned with his views, he may be looking to reshape military policies and approaches, especially concerning defense strategies and international engagements.
**Editor:** Elon Musk’s recent presence in the White House is also noteworthy. How do you think his relationship with Trump could influence political dynamics further?
**Sarah Mitchell:** Musk’s recent shift from critic to ally of Trump might signify a broader trend where influential figures in technology and business align themselves with political power. This could lead to policies that favor technological advancements within the military or strategies that prioritize private-sector collaboration, which could have both positive and negative implications.
**Editor:** How do you foresee this situation impacting the perception of military leadership both domestically and internationally?
**Sarah Mitchell:** Domestically, there could be a split opinion. Some may view it as a necessary purge of perceived ‘deep state’ elements, while others might see it as a destabilizing factor that undermines the apolitical nature of the military. Internationally, allies may feel uncertain about U.S. stability and reliability in defense commitments if there are sudden changes in military leadership and strategy.
**Editor:** what should we be watching for in the coming weeks as these developments unfold?
**Sarah Mitchell:** Key indicators include announcements regarding changes in military leadership, the response from Congress, and any potential pushback from within the Pentagon. Additionally, pay attention to how international allies react to the shifting U.S. military landscape, as it could shape future diplomatic relations.
**Editor:** Thank you, Sarah, for your insights. It will certainly be interesting to see how these developments unfold.
**Sarah Mitchell:** Thank you for having me.