After the victory of the former American president in the presidential election in the United States, the news of Donald Trump and his loyalists are intertwined on the world scene. Elon Musk, who criticized Donald Trump in the past, found his way into the White House, while now there are reports that top positions in the Pentagon, such as the Army, Navy, Marines, Air Force, National Guard, etc., are going to be furloughed because Donald With Trump assuming the presidency, several officers including the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff will be dismissed.
In the United States, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff is the head of the armed forces.
According to the foreign news agency “Reuters”, two independent sources confirmed that a list has been prepared, including the name of the chairman of the Pentagon’s Joint Chiefs of Staff, who will be dismissed.
It should be noted that Trump will take office as the President of the United States on November 5, and a source in his new administration confirmed that the news of a major change in the Pentagon has caused a stir throughout the organization and that the list being prepared is small. There is also the possibility of change.
Earlier in his election campaign, Donald Trump has given a threatening message to the military journals that criticized the withdrawal of American troops from Afghanistan in 2021.
Another source said the incoming administration would likely focus on U.S. military officers linked to Trump’s former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Mark Milley.
Mark Milley was quoted in Bob Woodward’s book “War,” published last month, as describing Trump as “fundamentally fascist” and Trump’s allies considering him to be with the former president. He was targeted for infidelity.
Another source said that any person or official who received a position from Mark Milley will be fired. According to sources, the list of people who have been supported by Mark Milley is long.
It should be noted that the Joint Chiefs of Staff is the highest position in the US military and includes the heads of the Army, Navy, Marines, Air Force, National Guard and Space Force.
The plans to fire senior leaders of the US armed forces were revealed a day before the presidential election, when Trump chose Pat Hegseth as his defense secretary.
Pat Hegseth has been a Fox News commentator and veteran who has expressed his intention to purge the Pentagon of undesirables.
#president #Trumps #target #Pentagon #including #military #chief
What are the potential risks associated with a shift in military leadership during a time of heightened global tensions?
**Interview with Political Analyst, Dr. Sarah Thompson**
**Editor:** Thank you for joining us, Dr. Thompson. With former President Donald Trump’s return to the presidency, we’re seeing significant ripple effects in various sectors, notably in the military. How are you assessing this situation?
**Dr. Thompson:** Thank you for having me. It’s a complex situation, to say the least. Trump’s presidency is set to bring drastic changes, particularly regarding military leadership. The reports of potential dismissals within the Pentagon, especially concerning the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, signal a stark shift in military policy and oversight that could have far-reaching repercussions.
**Editor:** What do you think the implications are for U.S. military effectiveness with such leadership changes?
**Dr. Thompson:** The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs plays a critical role in military strategy and execution. If key leaders are furloughed or dismissed, it could lead to disruptions in continuity and functionality at a time when global tensions are high. It’s essential to maintain stability in military leadership, and sudden changes could result in strategic vulnerabilities.
**Editor:** Elon Musk’s recent move into the White House has raised eyebrows as well. Given his past criticisms of Trump, what impact might his involvement have on U.S. policies?
**Dr. Thompson:** Musk’s relationship with Trump will be closely scrutinized. His influence in technology and space could reshape defense-related policies, especially concerning innovation and military technology. However, this also raises questions about conflicts of interest and the potential for accountability in defense contracts. It’s a dual-edged sword; he can bring innovation but also poses risks if personal interests overshadow national security.
**Editor:** Some are expressing concerns about the implications of Trump’s loyalists filling top positions. How do you foresee this loyalty affecting policy decisions?
**Dr. Thompson:** Loyalty over expertise can be detrimental. While a loyal team may present a united front, it risks sidelining seasoned professionals who provide critical, objective perspectives. This could hinder strategic decision-making and lead to policies that aren’t in the best interest of national or global security.
**Editor:** In your opinion, what’s the best course of action for the newly assembled leadership in the Pentagon?
**Dr. Thompson:** They need to prioritize stability and continuity. Engaging with career military professionals and emphasizing collaboration can help bridge the gaps created by these changes. It’s crucial that they foster an environment of trust and respect, both in Washington and among military ranks, to ensure that the U.S. military remains effective and focused on its missions.
**Editor:** Thank you, Dr. Thompson, for your insights. As we move forward, it will be fascinating to see how these developments unfold.
**Dr. Thompson:** Thank you for having me. It’s certainly a critical time for U.S. governance and military leadership.
