Article 63 A revision case decided not on occasion but on necessity, Kamran Murtaza – Pakistan

Jamiat Ulema Islam (F) Senator Kamran Murtaza has apologized for joining the bench of Justice Muneeb Akhtar in the Article 63A revision case saying that it would have been good if he had joined the bench. Should have paid.

Speaking in the news program “Spotlight” today, Kamran Murtaza said that I have objection to Justice Muneeb Akhtar’s position, but at this time I have more objection to the fixation of this case, I believe that the majority of this case The decision is not in accordance with the Constitution, and the case that is now scheduled for hearing was done out of necessity and not out of necessity.

He said that review of Article 63A decision is a constitutional right and while exercising the constitutional right, the bench can correct the decision if it feels that it has erred.

He said that a constitutional dispute will surely arise with whatever decision the court takes.

Speaking in the program, Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) leader Shoaib Shaheen also said that Justice Muneeb Akhtar should join the hearing of this case. He said that Justice Muneeb Akhtar did not say that I don’t want to sit in the bench, the objection he raised is related to the points of Justice Mansoor Ali Shah in which he explained the reconstruction and constitutional issues of the committee through the ordinance. Go, Justice Muneeb Akhtar has supported them.

He said that we still accept the full court on this.