The Argentine government on Wednesday condemned the decision of the Venezuelan Prosecutor’s Office to process the request for an arrest warrant against President Javier Milei in the case of the Venezuelan-Iranian plane held in Buenos Aires since 2022 and sent to the United States last February.
“The Argentine Republic repudiates the arrest warrants issued by the Attorney General of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela against the President of the Nation, Javier Milei, the Secretary General of the Presidency, Karina Milei, and the Minister of Security, Patricia Bullrich, following the incident involving the Emtrasur airline plane,” the Argentine Foreign Ministry said in a statement.
According to Milei’s government, “the case in question was resolved by the judiciary, an independent power over which the executive cannot and should not have any influence, in accordance with an international agreement.”
“The Argentine government reminds the Venezuelan regime that the separation of powers and the independence of judges prevail in the Argentine Republic, something that unfortunately does not occur in Venezuela under the regime of Nicolás Maduro,” the statement added.
In statements broadcast on state channel VTV on Wednesday, Venezuelan Attorney General Tarek William Saab announced that two specialized prosecutors “are processing the arrest warrant” against Milei, her sister Karina and Bullrich.
He explained that, in the case of the plane, which was “completely dismantled” in the United States, according to Venezuelan law, the crimes of “aggravated robbery, money laundering, unlawful deprivation of liberty, simulation of a punishable act, unlawful interference, disabling of aircraft and criminal association” were committed.
On the other hand, Saab reported the appointment of a “specialized prosecutor in matters of protection of human rights to carry out the corresponding investigations” against Milei and Bullrich for “the actions committed against the Argentine people” and asserted that “serious violations of human rights could be present that could constitute crimes against humanity.”
The prosecutor, who called Milei a “fascist” and a “neo-Nazi,” said that Argentina is implementing a “premeditated program of institutional violence” against its population, and he pointed to the Argentine president as “the most ferocious violator of human rights on the continent” and as “a brutal danger for the entire hemisphere.”
This month, Argentina’s Foreign Ministry urged the International Criminal Court (ICC) to request an arrest warrant against Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and “other leaders of the regime” in light of “the worsening situation” following the presidential elections in the Caribbean country on July 28.
Buenos Aires / EFE
#Argentina #rejects #Venezuelas #request #arrest #warrant #Javier #Milei
2024-09-19 07:41:31
What led to Argentina’s strong condemnation of Venezuela’s arrest warrant against President Javier Milei?
Table of Contents
Argentina Condemns Venezuela’s Arrest Warrant Against President Javier Milei
The Argentine government has strongly condemned the decision of the Venezuelan Prosecutor’s Office to issue an arrest warrant against President Javier Milei, Secretary General of the Presidency Karina Milei, and Minister of Security Patricia Bullrich. The warrant stems from the case of the Venezuelan-Iranian plane held in Buenos Aires since 2022 and later sent to the United States last February.
A Repudiation of Venezuela’s Actions
In a statement, the Argentine Foreign Ministry repudiated the arrest warrants, citing the independence of the judiciary in Argentina. “The Argentine Republic repudiates the arrest warrants issued by the Attorney General of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela against the President of the Nation, Javier Milei, the Secretary General of the Presidency, Karina Milei, and the Minister of Security, Patricia Bullrich, following the incident involving the Emtrasur airline plane.”
Argentina’s Commitment to Separation of Powers
The Argentine government emphasized that the case was resolved by the judiciary, an independent power that the executive cannot influence. “The case in question was resolved by the judiciary, an independent power over which the executive cannot and should not have any influence, in accordance with an international agreement.” This commitment to the separation of powers is a fundamental aspect of Argentina’s democratic system, which stands in stark contrast to Venezuela’s regime under Nicolás Maduro.
Venezuela’s Allegations
Venezuelan Attorney General Tarek William Saab announced that two specialized prosecutors were processing the arrest warrant against Milei, Karina Milei, and Bullrich. Saab alleged that crimes including “aggravated robbery, money laundering, unlawful deprivation of liberty, simulation of a punishable act, unlawful interference, disabling of aircraft, and criminal association” were committed in relation to the plane. Additionally, Saab reported the appointment of a “specialized prosecutor in matters of protection of human rights” to investigate Milei and Bullrich for “the actions committed against the Argentine people,” which he claimed could constitute crimes against humanity.
A History of Tensions
The incident involving the Emtrasur airline plane has been a point of contention between Argentina and Venezuela since 2022. The plane, which was suspected of having ties to Iran, was held in Buenos Aires before being sent to the United States last February. Venezuela has accused Argentina of violating international law by allowing the plane to be sent to the US.
Argentina’s Response
The Argentine government has rejected Venezuela’s allegations, citing the independence of its judiciary and the rule of law. “The Argentine government reminds the Venezuelan regime that the separation of powers and the independence of judges prevail in the Argentine Republic, something that unfortunately does not occur in Venezuela under the regime of Nicolás Maduro.” The government has also emphasized its commitment to protecting human rights and upholding democratic principles.
Conclusion
The arrest warrant issued by Venezuela against President Javier Milei and other Argentine officials is a clear example of the deteriorating relations between the two countries. Argentina’s condemnation of the warrant is a testament to its commitment to the rule of law and the independence of its judiciary. As tensions continue to escalate, it remains to be seen how this situation will unfold and what implications it will have for regional relations.
Keyword optimization: Argentina, Venezuela, Javier Milei, Karina Milei, Patricia Bullrich, arrest warrant, Emtrasur airline plane, separation of powers, independence of judiciary, rule of law, human rights, democratic principles.
– What were the main reasons behind Argentina’s condemnation of the Venezuelan arrest warrant against its officials?
What Led to Argentina’s Strong Condemnation of Venezuela’s Arrest Warrant Against President Javier Milei?
The Argentine government has strongly condemned the decision of the Venezuelan Prosecutor’s Office to issue an arrest warrant against President Javier Milei, Secretary General of the Presidency Karina Milei, and Minister of Security Patricia Bullrich. The warrant stems from the case of the Venezuelan-Iranian plane held in Buenos Aires since 2022 and later sent to the United States last February.
A Repudiation of Venezuela’s Actions
In a statement, the Argentine Foreign Ministry repudiated the arrest warrants, citing the independence of the judiciary in Argentina. The government emphasized that the case was resolved by the judiciary, an independent power
