German Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock described the ceasefire between Israel and Lebanon as a “ray of hope” for the entire region.
The German newspaper “Spiegel” reported, citing Baerbock, that this truce represents “a success for diplomacy and what can be achieved through it.”
Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau expressed his country’s welcome of reaching a ceasefire agreement in Lebanon, calling on all parties to implement it fully.
The Canadian Prime Ministry published Trudeau saying: “Canada welcomes the ceasefire agreement between Israel and Lebanon, which entered into force at 4:00 a.m. Jerusalem time.”
He stressed the necessity of this step to ensure stability and security in the region, thanking the United States and France for their efforts in achieving the agreement.
British Prime Minister Keir Starmer said that the ceasefire between Israel and Lebanon would provide a measure of relief to civilians.
He added that immediate progress must be seen towards reaching a ceasefire in Gaza, releasing all hostages, and lifting restrictions on humanitarian access to the Strip.
For his part, British Foreign Secretary David Lammy affirmed Britain’s support for the role of UNIFIL forces in maintaining peace on the Blue Line between Israel and Lebanon, while strengthening cooperation with the Lebanese Armed Forces, and urged adherence to the ceasefire to pave the way for lasting peace.
- United Nations..
In an official statement, the United Nations Special Coordinator in Lebanon, Jeanine Plasschaert, welcomed the agreement, considering that ensuring the sustainability of its implementation in the long term requires “a lot of work.”
She said, “This detailed agreement represents the starting point for a decisive process aimed at ensuring the safety of civilians on both sides of the Blue Line.”
- European Union..
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen welcomed the agreement and described it as “very encouraging news” that will strengthen internal security and stability in Lebanon thanks to restricting the influence of Lebanese factions.
She stressed that the agreement is welcomed “primarily for the Lebanese and Israeli peoples affected by the fighting.”
Iran welcomed the cessation of the Israeli aggression against Lebanon, and Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Ismail Baghaei said that Tehran “welcomes the news of the end of the Zionist entity’s aggression against Lebanon,” stressing the continued “firm Iranian support for the Lebanese government, people and resistance.”
Egypt expressed its welcome for the ceasefire to enter into force in a step that would contribute to the start of a phase of de-escalation in the region.
The Egyptian Foreign Ministry explained that this will only be achieved through the full implementation of Security Council Resolution No. 1701 with all its elements, and enabling the Lebanese army to deploy in southern Lebanon and extend its control over the entire Lebanese territory.
The Foreign Ministry stressed that the ceasefire agreement in Lebanon should be a prelude to stopping the Israeli war on Gaza
The Turkish Foreign Ministry welcomed the positive outcome of the ceasefire negotiations in Lebanon, hoping that this ceasefire will be permanent.
She added: “The international community should put pressure on Israel to literally adhere to the ceasefire and compensate for the damage it caused to Lebanon.”
Announcing the agreement between Lebanon and Israel..
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu announced on Tuesday evening the mini-ministerial council’s approval of a ceasefire agreement between Tel Aviv and Lebanon.
This was followed by US President Joe Biden announcing that Israel and Lebanon had agreed to a ceasefire in what is the bloodiest conflict between the two sides.
The ceasefire agreement between Lebanon and Israel entered into force at four o’clock in the morning on Wednesday, more than a year after skirmishes turned into Israeli aggression and intense fighting.
Source: Novosti + RT
#Arab #international #ceasefire #agreement #Israel #Lebanon
► What are the underlying concerns driving the diverse international responses to the Israel-Hezbollah ceasefire?
## International Reaction Mixed to Israel-Hezbollah Ceasefire
Today we’re joined by [Guest Name], a Middle East expert, to discuss the reactions to the newly brokered ceasefire between Israel and Hezbollah. The truce went into effect early this morning after a period of intense fighting.
[Guest Name], the international community seems to be cautiously optimistic. What are your key takeaways?
**[Guest Name]:**
This ceasefire is certainly a welcome development, and the international response reflects that. While many acknowledge this is a positive step, there’s a shared understanding that it’s just the beginning.
**Anchor:**
You can see that clearly in the varied responses. German Foreign Minister Baerbock called it a “ray of hope” for the region, while the UK Prime Minister Starmer focused on the immediate relief it brings to civilians and stressed the need for a similar cessation of hostilities in Gaza. Can you expand on these different perspectives?
**[Guest Name]:**
Absolutely. Baerbock emphasizes the potential of diplomacy in resolving these complex conflicts. Germany, along with others like France and the United States, played a key role in brokering this agreement. Their focus is on long-term stability and building on this success. On the other hand, the UK’s statement reflects a more urgent concern for the humanitarian situation, particularly in Gaza. The humanitarian crisis there demands immediate action alongside efforts to achieve a ceasefire.
**Anchor:**
We also saw reactions from Canada, the UN, and the European Union. What are the underlying concerns driving these diverse responses?
**[Guest Name]:**
Each country and organization has its own set of priorities and concerns. Canada, for example, expressed strong support for the agreement and thanked the US and France for their efforts, highlighting the importance of stability in the region. The UN stresses the importance of ensuring the ceasefire is sustainable in the long term, recognizing the challenges of maintaining peace. Meanwhile, the EU expressed hope that this agreement will lead to further stability within Lebanon by reducing the influence of militant groups.
**Anchor:**
Interesting. Unfortunately, Iran has welcomed the end of what it calls “Israeli aggression.” This paints a stark contrast with the other responses.
**[Guest Name]:**
Yes, Iran’s response highlights the complexities of this conflict. While many see the ceasefire as a step toward peace, Tehran sees it from a different perspective, framing it as a victory against Israel. This underscores the deep divisions within the region and the need for continued diplomatic efforts to build trust and understanding.
**Anchor:**
Thank you for providing such a insightful overview of the international reactions to the ceasefire, [Guest Name]. It’s clear that while the ceasefire is a welcome development, the road to lasting peace in the region remains long and challenging.
