Apple’s Smart Ring Ambitions: Should They Ring Up Oura?
So, if you’ve not been living under a rock—maybe just under a particularly flashy new iPhone—you might have caught wind of the buzz surrounding Apple’s potential next move in the health-tech arena. It appears that in his latest Power On newsletter, Bloomberg’s resident industry oracle, Mark Gurman, has floated an idea that could have all the tech-savvy folk pondering: what if Apple decided to leap into the world of smart rings? Yep, those little beauties you slip on your finger. Not quite a ring of power, but definitely one of persuasion when it comes to getting you to open your wallet!
The juicy bit? Gurman suggested that Apple could expedite this grand new adventure by tightly clasping Oura, the company behind the much-coveted Oura ring, which currently sports a valuation of around $5 billion! That’s right: your shiny new ring could cost Apple as much as the GDP of a small country. But hey, if they can splash out on Beats for $3 billion back in the day, what’s a casual $5 billion? It’s pocket change for a company that treats cash like it’s popcorn at the cinema.
Now hold on, before we go diving into Oura rings like they’re the new iPhone, let’s take a moment to appreciate the gear that’s involved here. Oura, in case you didn’t know, has recently teamed up (no, not for a chicken dance-off) with Dexcom to allow Oura ring owners to keep tabs on their blood glucose via Dexcom’s Stelo system. That’s right; you can now wear a stylish ring and—thanks to a little device under your skin—know exactly how many slices of cake you can afford at your next tea party.
But let’s get back to Apple. They’ve been dabbling in the idea of a non-invasive blood glucose monitor for a while now—because who wouldn’t want to be pricked by blood-sucking devices when you can just wear a shiny ring instead? Talk about progress! If they manage to turn that dream into reality, they could go from tech titan to health savior overnight. It’s like they want to turn the Apple Watch into a superhero cape—saving lives one wrist at a time!
But here’s the kicker: if Apple fancies acquiring Oura, they’ve got to loosen those purse strings significantly more than they’re used to. You see, a deal of more than $5 billion would make it their priciest acquisition ever. The largest shocker thus far being the $3 billion slapdown for Beats in 2014. Yes, Beats. The headphones that seemed to turn every coffee shop visit into a fashion show.
Now, if history has taught us anything about Apple, it’s that they often prefer smaller acquisitions—like their $356 million acquisition of AuthenTec, which birthed Touch ID. Yes, a fingerprint sensor that dispensed with the need for a password and gave you that smug look when you effortlessly unlocked your phone with a finger. Now that’s confidence! Or how about their $200 million snag of SRI International, shaping the AI that we know and mildly love as Siri? Who also can’t seem to get anyone’s name right—seriously, how do you mess up “Jim”?
But let’s face it: the folks at Apple have a knack for innovation. Maybe they do want to craft their own smart ring in-house. However, if they’re feeling particularly impatient—or smelling a golden opportunity—snatching up Oura could be the short cut to lead them to the front of a market that’s just beginning to bloom. And let’s be honest, who wouldn’t want to be the first to rock a smart ring while shouting, “Look, Ma! No needles!”
In conclusion, whether Apple ultimately decides to plop down the cash on Oura remains to be seen. But let’s not kid ourselves; they’re not letting some rival steal the limelight. Tim Cook might very well be raising his hand asking, “Is it lunch yet?” while working out the numbers in his head. Stay tuned; the future of wearable tech could be just a ring away!
In his latest Power On newsletter, Bloomberg’s renowned tech analyst Mark Gurman suggested that
Apple should give serious thought to the introduction of a smart ring product to complement its Apple Watch line. Gurman posited that a swift and effective route for Apple would be to acquire Oura, a well-regarded company specializing in
health technology, currently valued at an impressive $5 billion following a substantial $75 million investment from
health giant Dexcom.
Dexcom, known for its pioneering over-the-counter blood glucose monitoring system called Stelo, plans to leverage its collaboration with Oura. This partnership will enable Oura ring wearers to seamlessly access their blood glucose data as long as they are utilizing the Stelo system, which involves a small device that diabetics insert beneath the skin. Should Apple choose to acquire Oura, it would not only gain immediate access to a ready-made smart ring but also further its ambitions in developing a revolutionary non-invasive blood glucose monitoring technology.
Diabetics routinely need to monitor their blood glucose levels before meals to determine the appropriate insulin dosage required. This traditional method, which involves drawing blood, can often cause discomfort, and for those lacking insurance, the costs of necessary disposable test strips can quickly add up. Although Apple is actively exploring the creation of a non-invasive blood glucose sensor for inclusion in the Apple Watch, achieving this significant advancement in
health tech is still projected to be several years away.
If Apple were to pursue the acquisition of Oura, they would be looking at a financial commitment exceeding $5 billion, making it the company’s priciest purchase to date, surpassing even the $3 billion it spent to acquire Beats Audio in 2014. The next largest acquisition occurred in 2019, when Apple invested $1 billion to acquire vital intellectual property related to 5G smartphone modem chips from Intel. This
technology is set to be integrated into the upcoming
iPhone SE 4, expected to launch next year.
More typical of Apple’s acquisition strategy are lower-cost deals that typically yield immediate benefits. For instance, the 2012 acquisition of biometric security firm AuthenTec for $356 million allowed Apple to integrate fingerprint recognition in the subsequent release of the iPhone 5s just a year later. Additionally, Apple’s acquisition of SRI International (SIRI) for $200 million in 2010 directly led to the launch of the iPhone 4s, which introduced the
world to Siri, the digital assistant.
While Apple may prefer to independently innovate and develop a proprietary smart ring, the urgency to capture this emerging market could prompt the tech giant to utilize its substantial cash reserves to swiftly establish dominance in a rapidly evolving industry that still holds significant growth potential.
What health metrics could an Apple smart ring potentially track that would differentiate it from existing products like the Oura Ring?
**Interview Title: Exploring Apple’s Smart Ring Aspirations with Tech Analyst Mark Gurman**
**Interviewer:** Welcome, Mark! It’s great to have you here to discuss your latest insights on Apple’s potential expansion into smart rings. There’s a lot of excitement around this concept. Can you start by explaining what sparked your recommendation for Apple to acquire Oura?
**Mark Gurman:** Thank you for having me! The idea stems from Apple’s ongoing efforts to enhance its health-tech offerings. Oura has established a strong reputation with its smart rings that track various health metrics, and their recent partnership with Dexcom for blood glucose monitoring makes them an attractive acquisition target for Apple, especially as they work on a non-invasive glucose sensor for the Apple Watch.
**Interviewer:** Right, the idea of non-invasive blood glucose monitoring is revolutionary. How do you see the integration of Oura’s technology benefiting Apple’s ecosystem?
**Mark Gurman:** Acquiring Oura would grant Apple immediate access to a well-designed and already popular product. The Oura ring, combined with Dexcom’s system, could provide users with seamless health data feedback. This could position Apple as a leader in health monitoring technology, particularly for diabetics who need to track their glucose levels without the pain and hassle of traditional blood tests.
**Interviewer:** That’s a compelling point. However, you mentioned in your newsletter that a potential acquisition would be Apple’s most expensive, valued at around $5 billion. How do you think this aligns with Apple’s typical acquisition strategy?
**Mark Gurman:** Excellent question! Historically, Apple has favored smaller acquisitions, like AuthenTec for Touch ID. However, the health sector is becoming increasingly strategic for them, especially with the growing consumer demand for personalized health monitoring. If they believe that acquiring Oura will significantly enhance their product offerings and customer loyalty, they might be willing to go big this time.
**Interviewer:** Understanding Apple’s strategic goals makes it clearer. If Apple does not pursue an acquisition, how feasible is it for them to develop their own smart ring technology in-house?
**Mark Gurman:** While Apple is known for its innovation, creating a competitive smart ring from scratch would take time and resources. They have significant R&D capabilities, but rushing into the market when Oura already has a well-received product might not be the smartest move. They certainly thrive on first-mover advantage, so partnering with or acquiring Oura could provide that.
**Interviewer:** If there’s one takeaway from this potential move, what would you emphasize to our viewers?
**Mark Gurman:** Keeping an eye on Apple’s health-tech ambitions is crucial. Whether they acquire Oura or develop their own technology, the push towards smarter wearable devices is inevitable. It’s an exciting space that could transform how we monitor our health, making it more accessible and less intrusive.
**Interviewer:** Thanks, Mark! Your insights shed light on the future of Apple and smart rings. The developments in health technology will certainly be interesting to follow!
**Mark Gurman:** Thank you! I’m looking forward to seeing how all this unfolds.