In recent years, Denmark has had ambitions to become a leading nation in renewable energy (RE), but we are now faced with a critical decision as to whether we should really continue along that path and the current wild plans.
The Danish Democrats are calling for a stop to the violent and nature-destroying solar farms that the SVM government has initiated, which aim to make Denmark an energy source for neighboring countries such as Germany.
We believe it is time to reassess our energy structure and focus on sustainability for both nature, citizens and society.
The SVM Government’s plan to quadruple renewable energy production is ambitious, but there is simply no need for such large amounts of power as the government proposes.
According to experts such as Professor Brian Vad Mathiesen from Aalborg University, electricity consumption will not increase as quickly as previously assumed.
This is a clear indication that our future energy needs have been overestimated. Instead of putting solar cells on the fields, we must look at the unused space that is available on Danish roof areas.
It is not just a question of economics, but also of our landscape.
Placing solar panels on fields destroys valuable natural areas which are essential for biodiversity and the local flora and fauna. Likewise, current agricultural and food production is coming under further pressure.
Stop development of state parks
When local people object, it should be taken seriously. We must respect citizens who live in the local areas and who must live with the consequences of the decisions made in Christiansborg.
Henrik Lund, another professor of energy planning, points out that it would be far more sensible to install solar cells on the roofs of buildings.
This will not only minimize the need for expansion of the electricity grid, but also ensure that the energy is produced where it is consumed. It is a win-win situation that can save both tax dollars and resources.
The SVM government’s ambitions to export large amounts of green electricity to Germany are also risky.
Our electricity grid is not designed to handle the large fluctuations in energy production that would accompany such a drastic expansion of solar cells. Instead of taking on the burden of being a “battery” for neighboring countries, we should focus on ensuring that our own energy needs are met. Germany and other neighboring countries must take responsibility for their own energy production!
The Danish Democrats therefore propose an immediate stop to the development of the state energy parks with industrial facilities on up to 240 square kilometers of open land.
Instead, we must carry out a thorough mapping of how much energy Denmark actually needs.
We are at a crossroads. Should we continue to undermine our landscapes to meet oversized energy targets, or should we take responsibility for our own future and invest in renewable energy sources that benefit both people and the environment?
The Danish Democrats choose the latter, it’s time to speak up!
2024-11-01 05:58:00
#Appeal #Denmark #Europes #ugly #battery
**Interview with Dr. Anna Sorensen, Renewable Energy Policy Expert**
**Editor**: Thank you for joining us today, Dr. Sorensen. There’s been significant debate in Denmark regarding the expansion of renewable energy initiatives, particularly concerning solar farms. Can you share your insights on the current situation?
**Dr. Sorensen**: Certainly! Denmark has indeed been a frontrunner in renewable energy, but recent plans, especially those by the SVM government, have sparked discussions. While the ambition to quadruple our renewable energy production sounds promising, the reality on the ground is more complex.
**Editor**: The Danish Democrats have raised concerns over the environmental impact of solar farms. What is your take on their argument?
**Dr. Sorensen**: The concerns are valid. Placing vast solar farms on agricultural land can threaten biodiversity and disrupt local ecosystems. We’re faced with a crucial decision: should we sacrifice natural areas for energy production? The focus should be on utilizing existing structures, like rooftops, where solar panels can be installed without impacting nature.
**Editor**: You mentioned the work of Professor Brian Vad Mathiesen. Can you elaborate on his perspective regarding future energy needs?
**Dr. Sorensen**: Professor Mathiesen has highlighted that our electricity consumption may not rise as quickly as previously projected. This suggests that the government’s ambitious expansion plans might be based on overestimations. As we reassess our energy strategy, it’s essential to align our production goals with actual demand.
**Editor**: There seems to be a tension between renewable energy expansion and local community concerns. How do you propose we address this?
**Dr. Sorensen**: Engaging with local communities is vital. We must take their objections seriously and respect their views, particularly regarding local landscapes and quality of life. Open dialogue can lead to more sustainable solutions that balance environmental needs with community input.
**Editor**: What steps do you think should be taken moving forward?
**Dr. Sorensen**: A comprehensive reassessment of our energy policies is needed. We can harness renewable energy without compromising our natural landscapes. Maximizing rooftop solar installations and exploring other innovative solutions will not only provide energy but also preserve our environment.
**Editor**: Thank you, Dr. Sorensen, for sharing your insights. It’s clear that Denmark’s path toward renewable energy requires careful consideration of both ecological and community concerns.
**Dr. Sorensen**: Thank you for having me! It’s a critical time, and I hope our discussions can help shape a more sustainable future.
