2024-11-23 01:45:00
Mire made clear Wednesday that his hostility toward the profession as a whole begins with certain journalists. “reporter” His post was titled “Well, your monopoly on the word is over… now you’ll make less money, but that’s normal in the free market.” (The full text of his message is reproduced below).
Just like when he wished The Perfeil Editor was bankrupt, the president was internally happy, not alarmed, but delighted that journalists were losing money — “their time has come,” he wrote in the post “Periodistas” — because he himself has contributed, as Stuszinger first explained: the opponent must be weakened economically, and then the president himself must raise taxes on media subscriptions.
Finally, he labeled news organizations that publicly rejected his criticism as “complicit in a sinister pattern of violence” and dismissed the National Press Institute, the Argentinian Association of Journalists’ Entities and the Argentinian Journalists Forum as “monopolies.” crime”.
Dictators don’t like this
The practice of professional and critical journalism is a fundamental pillar of democracy. That’s why it bothers those who think they have the truth.
What worse accusation could there be? What greater insult could a man receive? Argentina has an admittedly anti-journalist president who is just as proud of his fight against journalism as he is of standing up to the country’s dangerous enemies. Mixed with boxing references and resorting to punches, it seems to evoke childhood trauma.
One of the consequences of screams is that they eventually so deafen the recipient that they cease to hear anything more than hear, until those manifestations that would be intolerable in isolation are naturalized. “That’s just the way it is,” shrugged, justifying the aggressor, because a mentally retarded person would not blame. This was exposed in a public conversation between the morning presenters of Radio Rivadavia, when Jonatan Viale told Marcelo Longobadi to respond to every act of aggression by the President It no longer makes sense, and Longobardi rightly corrects that the biggest problem lies with this naturalization.
This personality is mainly developed in the first ten years of life and is likely to be unchangeable, but different types of antisocial attitudes are subject to legal and peer ostracism as corrective measures.
Another symptom of this escalation to the entire press occurred the day after the above-mentioned post “Journalist”, at an Argentinian-Israeli Chamber of Commerce event in which Milai was present and unbelievably retracted All journalists were invited on the pretext that the drone could pose a threat because it would only pose a threat to journalists, not businessmen and other guests who could normally attend. In another instance, people who were not attending an event that Milley asked them to attend were disinvited if they wanted to attend. But in the last case, it’s no longer about a particular journalist, but everyone.
The day before, hours before his post/manifesto they wanted to lie, slander, insult, be dirty, say anything out of the ordinary and they expected me not to even answer them… They are blackmailers, they are thieves , they are corrupt… before the reporter leaves, throw a folder on the table and say, “If you don’t give me X amount of money, I’m going to take all this out and make you dirty…”. “We produce great news every day, and the media is talking dirty… They are professional abusers.”
There was clearly a very strong paranoid obsession with journalism, which seemed to occupy a kind of primordial specter in Millais’s imagination. He said in an interview about his relationship with his sister, “Moses was a great leader, but he was not good at spreading the message. And then God sent Aaron to spread the message. Well, Karina is Moi Seth, I’m the one who revealed it. “I’m just a popularizer. ” Aaron is Moisés’ brother, and if Karina is Moisés’ “boss,” then the other communicators are Aaron/Milei’s challengers.
Just as the president’s symbolic family constellation is made up of “his four-legged children,” he also sees communicators as his direct competitors. This is bad news for democracy, which requires critical journalism as an adjunct to a system of division of power.
reporter
News about Javier Mire
A large part of the press favors ultra-violent hard boxing, characterized by the fact that the opponent’s hands and feet must be bound. Therefore, they made great efforts to set an “example” for the refinement of art. In turn, the opponent, unable to defend himself, is often blackmailed into preventing them from doing him too much harm.
However, thanks to technology, cell phones and social networks, today’s microphone criminals are seeing their victims not only successfully free themselves, but also possess powerful reflexes. As a result, they find themselves not only not great fighters, but due to asymmetrical punishment, they are far less mediocre against tough opponents.
I want to tell these pseudo-journalists that it’s time to pay for their lies, slander, insults and even extortion.
On the other hand, when they offer these joint responses, those who join these letters not only prove that they are complicit in a sinister pattern of violence, but by joining forces, they form a complicit solution that makes competitive markets behave as if Yes it will be a monopoly.
Thanks to social networks, the caste privileges they had enjoyed for so long and exercised in so many violent ways came to an end. So accept that the world is a better place and your monopoly on words is over. It’s time to put them to work honestly. It’s time for them to level the playing field. Yes, they’ll make less money now, but that’s normal in the free market.
1732328309
#antijournalist
## Interview with Media Analyst on Javier Milei’s Attitude Towards Journalism
## Interview with Media Analyst on Javier Milei’s Attitude Towards Journalism
**Host:** Welcome to *Media Insights*, where we explore the intersection of media and politics. Today, we’re joined by Dr. Elena Mendez, a media analyst specializing in political communication. Thank you for being here, Dr. Mendez.
**Dr. Mendez:** Thank you for having me.
**Host:** Javier Milei, the recently elected president of Argentina, has made headlines with his contentious relationship with the press. What seems to be the root of his hostility toward journalists?
**Dr. Mendez:** Milei’s hostility can be traced to a combination of personal beliefs and political strategy. He perceives journalism as a “monopoly” that threatens his narrative and economic interests. His recent statements suggest a deep-seated paranoia about the media, seeing them as adversaries rather than partners in democracy.
**Host:** In his post titled ”Periodistas,” he declared, “your monopoly on the word is over.” What does this signal about his administration’s approach to the media?
**Dr. Mendez:** This statement reflects an aggressive strategy to weaken the media’s influence. By portraying journalists as having too much power, he aims to diminish their credibility and economic stability, which he views as a way to consolidate his own power and control over the narrative.
**Host:** There are concerns that this attitude could undermine democracy in Argentina. Can you elaborate on that?
**Dr. Mendez:** Yes, absolutely. A healthy democracy relies on a free and independent press that holds power accountable. Milei’s approach appears aimed at stifling dissent and critical voices in journalism, which can ultimately lead to a more authoritarian regime. When political leaders label dissenting media as “complicit” or “thieves,” it creates an environment where fear and self-censorship thrive.
**Host:** He has even gone so far as to describe the National Press Institute and other journalists’ associations as “monopolies of crime.” How does this rhetoric impact journalistic integrity?
**Dr. Mendez:** Such rhetoric not only demeans journalistic integrity but also fosters an environment where journalists might be less willing to investigate or report critically on the government. This labeling serves to de-legitimize their work and could lead to increased violence or harassment against journalists, further threatening their ability to operate freely.
**Host:** in light of Milei’s views on the press and his references to boxing and aggression, what might this suggest about his overall political style?
**Dr. Mendez:** His style appears to blend populism with confrontation. By invoking boxing metaphors, he positions himself as a fighter against perceived enemies, including the media. This combative stance is a classic populist tactic that rallies supporters by creating an ‘us vs. them’ mentality. However, such an approach is dangerous for democratic discourse, as it discourages debate and critical engagement.
**Host:** Thank you, Dr. Mendez, for your insights on Javier Milei’s troubling relationship with journalism and its implications for democracy in Argentina.
**Dr. Mendez:** Thank you for having me; it’s crucial we keep this conversation going.
**Host:** And thank you to our viewers for tuning in to *Media Insights*. Stay informed and engaged; we’ll see you next time.
