The mole hunt has begun among the red robes. The scoop from , which yesterday published the anti-Meloni post by Antonella Marrone, the AreaDg judge, drove the members of this left-wing current crazy. Marrone is the Rome magistrate who signed some of the measures suspending the detention of migrants in Albania, with the consequence that this morning they had already returned to Italy. In the chats and messages between the magistrates, a real tom tam has started to ask to raise the level of guard, since it is considered unacceptable that the press dares to delve into the (recent) past and into the ideas publicly expressed by the judges. We need to remember what Marrone wrote on 12 September 2022, shortly before the political elections. He had taken a screenshot of a post by Giorgia Meloni with which the future prime minister wished her daughter a happy first day at school. This photo was published on his WhatsApp “status”, with the following comment: «Ah, isn’t it anger, ego, ambition and envy that drives it? Hearing her speak in that angry voice seemed the opposite to me. I must have been wrong.”
It is the second time that the red robes protest against . It also happened last October 20, when the deputy prosecutor of Cassation Marco Patarnello of the Democratic Magistracy wrote in an ANM mailing list that Meloni is more dangerous than Silvio Berlusconi because she has no investigations. Immediately afterwards he received the support of the left, with Avs senator Ilaria Cucchi suing to find out the source of this news, in spite of freedom of the press. Incidentally, Patarnello’s movement celebrated its sixtieth anniversary in the Capitol last Saturday and Sunday. On that occasion, judge Silvia Albano, who was the first to “free” 12 migrants in Albania in mid-October, on the eve of Marrone’s sentence, anticipated the orientation of the Court of Rome on the need to get illegal immigrants out of the CPR in based on the interpretation of a ruling of the European Court of Justice.
The magistrate then added that “nothing can be done about the supremacy of European law, it is the government that seeks conflict”. A preview that provoked the reaction of Forza Italia group leader Maurizio Gasparri in the Senate, who asked the Keeper of the Seals Carlo Nordio to send inspectors to the immigration section of the Court of Rome. The line of these judges from the DG Area and Democratic Magistracy is fully supported by the president of the ANM Giuseppe Santalucia, according to whom “the situation has even worsened” compared to the times of Silvio Berlusconi, because previously the “red robes” were the public prosecutors , while now the red robes are everywhere, even in the civil courts and anyone who takes an unwelcome measure turns red.” It’s a shame that those red robes then write verbatim that the FdI leader “has a loud angry voice” and is dominated by “ego, envy and ambition”.
#AntiMeloni #judge #mole #hunt #among #red #robes #scoop #Tempo #Tempo
How do recent public statements by judges, such as those from Antonella Marrone and Marco Patarnello, reflect broader concerns about judicial independence in Italy?
**Interview with Legal Analyst Francesca Rossi**
**Dario Martini:** Welcome, Francesca! Thank you for joining us today to discuss the recent tensions within the Italian judiciary concerning public statements made by magistrate Antonella Marrone and the implications for judicial independence.
**Francesca Rossi:** Thank you for having me, Dario. It’s a pleasure to be here.
**Dario:** Let’s delve into the situation. The judge Antonella Marrone posted a comment about Giorgia Meloni’s post on social media, which has stirred quite a reaction. Why do you think this has created such a stir among magistrates?
**Francesca:** This situation reflects a deeper anxiety among some members of the judiciary regarding public perception and the increasingly vocal political climate in Italy. The concern is not just about a single comment, but about how magistrates’ views can influence their judicial impartiality, especially in a politically charged environment.
**Dario:** You mentioned the broader implications. Can you elaborate on how this impacts judicial independence in Italy?
**Francesca:** Absolutely. Judicial independence is crucial for a functioning democracy. When judges express political opinions, especially openly on social media, it can undermine public confidence in their ability to rule impartially. The reactions – like the call for heightened “guard” – indicate a fear within the judiciary about how judges are perceived and the potential backlash they could face from the press and the public.
**Dario:** There was also a discussion about Marco Patarnello’s remarks regarding Meloni being “more dangerous than Berlusconi.” What does this indicate about the current political atmosphere?
**Francesca:** Patarnello’s remarks highlight a significant divide within the judicial community itself, reflecting an ideological clash. His statement suggests that some magistrates see the current political leadership as potentially unchecked, which raises concerns about accountability. This speaks to a broader anxiety among segments of the judiciary about the influence of politics on justice.
**Dario:** With all these developments, what do you think the future holds for the relationship between the judiciary and the government in Italy?
**Francesca:** The future is precarious. If the judiciary is seen to be taking sides or if there are increasing public revelations about judges’ personal political views, this could lead to a crisis of confidence. Both the judiciary and the government need to navigate these waters carefully to maintain the integrity of their roles. Transparency and accountability will be key.
**Dario:** Thank you, Francesca, for your insights. This is indeed a critical moment for the judiciary in Italy.
**Francesca:** Thank you, Dario. It’s vital to keep this dialog open as we monitor these unfolding events.