The mole hunt has begun among the red robes. The scoop from , which yesterday published the anti-Meloni post by Antonella Marrone, the AreaDg judge, drove the members of this left-wing current crazy. Marrone is the Rome magistrate who signed some of the measures suspending the detention of migrants in Albania, with the consequence that this morning they had already returned to Italy. In the chats and messages between the magistrates a real tom tam has started to ask to raise the level of guard, since it is considered unacceptable that the press dares to delve into the (recent) past and into the ideas expressed publicly by the judges. We need to remember what Marrone wrote on 12 September 2022, shortly before the political elections. He had taken a screenshot of a post by Giorgia Meloni with which the future prime minister wished her daughter a happy first day at school. This photo was published on his WhatsApp “status”, with the following comment: «Ah, isn’t it anger, ego, ambition and envy that drives it? Hearing her speak in that angry voice seemed the opposite to me. I must have been wrong.”
It is the second time that the red robes protest against . It also happened last October 20, when the deputy prosecutor of Cassation Marco Patarnello of the Democratic Magistracy wrote in an ANM mailing list that Meloni is more dangerous than Silvio Berlusconi because she has no investigations. Immediately afterwards he received the support of the left, with Avs senator Ilaria Cucchi suing to find out the source of this news, in spite of freedom of the press. Incidentally, Patarnello’s movement celebrated its sixtieth anniversary in the Capitol last Saturday and Sunday. On that occasion, judge Silvia Albano, who was the first to “free” 12 migrants in Albania in mid-October, on the eve of Marrone’s sentence, anticipated the orientation of the Court of Rome on the need to get illegal immigrants out of the CPR in based on the interpretation of a ruling of the European Court of Justice.
The magistrate then added that “nothing can be done about the supremacy of European law, it is the government that seeks conflict”. A preview that provoked the reaction of Forza Italia group leader Maurizio Gasparri in the Senate, who asked the Keeper of the Seals Carlo Nordio to send inspectors to the immigration section of the Court of Rome. The line of these judges from the DG Area and Democratic Magistracy is fully supported by the president of the ANM Giuseppe Santalucia, according to whom “the situation has even worsened” compared to the times of Silvio Berlusconi, because previously the “red robes” were the public prosecutors , while now the red robes are everywhere, even in the civil courts and anyone who takes an unwelcome measure turns red.” It’s a shame that those red robes then write verbatim that the FdI leader “has a loud angry voice” and is dominated by “ego, envy and ambition”.
#AntiMeloni #judge #mole #hunt #among #red #robes #scoop #Tempo #Tempo
What are the potential consequences for judges who express personal opinions on social media regarding political figures?
**Interview with Judge Antonella Marrone**
*Interviewer: Dario Martini*
**Dario Martini:** Thank you for joining us today, Judge Marrone. We’re discussing the recent controversies surrounding social media posts and comments made by magistrates regarding political figures, particularly Giorgia Meloni. Can you clarify your views on the implications of sharing personal opinions in a public forum?
**Judge Antonella Marrone:** Thank you for having me, Dario. It’s a complex situation. While every individual has a right to express personal opinions, judges must consider the influence their words may have on public perception and the judiciary itself. In an era where social media allows rapid dissemination of information, our expressions can easily be misconstrued or taken out of context.
**Dario Martini:** In light of your comments on Meloni’s post about her daughter, do you believe that such statements undermine the impartiality expected from judges?
**Judge Marrone:** I understand the concern. My intent was not to undermine any public figures but to express a reaction to the tone of the political discourse observed at that time. However, I recognize that my actions might have stirred controversy, and it’s critical for judges to remain mindful of their public personas.
**Dario Martini:** There has been significant backlash from within the judicial community regarding these remarks. How do you respond to those fellow judges seeking to raise the level of scrutiny on colleagues’ social media use?
**Judge Marrone:** It’s a healthy process to evaluate how we communicate as public servants. Open dialogue about the boundaries of personal expressions versus professional conduct can help strengthen our institution’s integrity. However, it’s essential that we balance this with not suppressing genuine voices.
**Dario Martini:** Recently, Deputy Prosecutor Marco Patarnello commented that Meloni poses a greater risk than Silvio Berlusconi due to her lack of investigations. What are your thoughts on how such statements impact the relationship between the judiciary and political entities?
**Judge Marrone:** This highlights the ongoing tension between the judiciary and political powers. While commentary on political figures is part of public discourse, we must tread carefully to maintain respect and independence. Our duty is to uphold the law without bias, regardless of personal opinions.
**Dario Martini:** how do you foresee the future of judicial discourse in this climate of heightened scrutiny?
**Judge Marrone:** I hope we move toward a more nuanced understanding of professionalism that allows for personal expression without compromising our integrity. It’s vital that judges remain engaged citizens while also embodying the principles of justice and unbiased decision-making.
**Dario Martini:** Thank you, Judge Marrone, for your insight. We appreciate your time.
**Judge Marrone:** Thank you, Dario. It was a pleasure.
