The mole hunt has begun among the red robes. The scoop from , which yesterday published the anti-Meloni post by Antonella Marrone, the AreaDg judge, drove the members of this left-wing current crazy. Marrone is the Rome magistrate who signed some of the measures suspending the detention of migrants in Albania, with the consequence that this morning they had already returned to Italy. In the chats and messages between the magistrates a real tom tam has started to ask to raise the level of guard, since it is considered unacceptable that the press dares to delve into the (recent) past and into the ideas expressed publicly by the judges. We need to remember what Marrone wrote on 12 September 2022, shortly before the political elections. He had taken a screenshot of a post by Giorgia Meloni with which the future prime minister wished her daughter a happy first day at school. This photo was published on his WhatsApp “status”, with the following comment: «Ah, isn’t it anger, ego, ambition and envy that drives it? Hearing her speak in that angry voice seemed the opposite to me. I must have been wrong.”
It is the second time that the red robes protest against . It also happened last October 20, when the deputy prosecutor of Cassation Marco Patarnello of the Democratic Magistracy wrote in an ANM mailing list that Meloni is more dangerous than Silvio Berlusconi because she has no investigations. Immediately afterwards he received the support of the left, with Avs senator Ilaria Cucchi suing to find out the source of this news, in spite of freedom of the press. Incidentally, Patarnello’s movement celebrated its sixtieth anniversary in the Capitol last Saturday and Sunday. On that occasion, judge Silvia Albano, who was the first to “free” 12 migrants in Albania in mid-October, on the eve of Marrone’s sentence, anticipated the orientation of the Court of Rome on the need to get illegal immigrants out of the CPR in based on the interpretation of a ruling of the European Court of Justice.
The magistrate then added that “nothing can be done about the supremacy of European law, it is the government that seeks conflict”. A preview that provoked the reaction of Forza Italia group leader Maurizio Gasparri in the Senate, who asked the Keeper of the Seals Carlo Nordio to send inspectors to the immigration section of the Court of Rome. The line of these judges from the DG Area and Democratic Magistracy is fully supported by the president of the ANM Giuseppe Santalucia, according to whom “the situation has even worsened” compared to the times of Silvio Berlusconi, because previously the “red robes” were the public prosecutors , while now the red robes are everywhere, even in the civil courts and anyone who takes an unwelcome measure turns red.” It’s a shame that those red robes then write verbatim that the FdI leader “has a loud angry voice” and is dominated by “ego, envy and ambition”.
#AntiMeloni #judge #mole #hunt #among #red #robes #scoop #Tempo #Tempo
How do magistrate Antonella Marrone’s comments challenge the principles of judicial impartiality in Italy, and what implications does this have for public trust in the judiciary?
**Interview with Legal Analyst Dr. Sofia Ricci on the Controversy Surrounding Magistrate Comments and Press Freedom**
**Interviewer:** Good afternoon, Dr. Ricci. Thank you for joining us today. The recent comments by magistrate Antonella Marrone regarding Giorgia Meloni have ignited quite a debate in Italy. What are your thoughts on the implications of her WhatsApp post?
**Dr. Ricci:** Good afternoon. This situation certainly raises critical questions about the intersection of the judiciary and political discourse in Italy. Marrone’s post seems to reflect personal opinions about a political figure, which can be concerning from the perspective of judicial impartiality. While judges are entitled to their personal views, their public expressions can inadvertently influence public perception of their professional objectivity.
**Interviewer:** Indeed. The magistrates have expressed a desire to raise the level of guard against media scrutiny. Do you think this reflects a broader issue regarding freedom of the press in Italy?
**Dr. Ricci:** Absolutely. The pushback against press coverage could indicate a fear within the judiciary of increased transparency and criticism, which is essential in a democratic society. The media plays a crucial role in holding public figures accountable, including judges. When the judiciary reacts defensively to press scrutiny, it may suggest an underlying discomfort with how their actions and statements are interpreted by the public.
**Interviewer:** What do you make of Deputy Prosecutor Marco Patarnello’s comments that Meloni is more dangerous than Berlusconi? How does this affect the perception of the judiciary?
**Dr. Ricci:** Patarnello’s remarks also highlight a partisan inclination that can erode public confidence in the judiciary. By comparing political figures in such stark terms, it blurs the line between the judiciary’s role and political commentary. The perceived bias might fuel allegations of politicization within the legal system, jeopardizing its credibility.
**Interviewer:** With the left supporting Patarnello and advocating for an investigation into the source of the remarks, how do you see the balance between protecting judicial independence and advocating for free speech?
**Dr. Ricci:** It’s a delicate balance. On one hand, judicial independence is essential to ensure fair legal proceedings free from political pressure. On the other hand, free speech, particularly for public officials, is paramount in a democracy. This situation underscores the need for a clear framework governing how judges can engage in public discourse without compromising their judicial responsibilities.
**Interviewer:** Lastly, given the current atmosphere, what steps do you think the judiciary should take to maintain its credibility amidst such controversies?
**Dr. Ricci:** Transparency and accountability are key. The judiciary could benefit from establishing clearer guidelines on public communication for its members, ensuring they can express opinions while maintaining the necessary separation from their judicial roles. Engaging in public education about the judiciary’s function and the principles of impartiality may also help rebuild trust among the citizenry.
**Interviewer:** Thank you very much for your insights, Dr. Ricci. This issue certainly raises essential questions about the relationship between law, politics, and media in Italy.
**Dr. Ricci:** Thank you for having me. It’s crucial for these conversations to continue as they shape the future of our democratic institutions.
