– The police confirm that a fourth person has been arrested and imprisoned. Since we are in the middle of the investigation, we cannot share more information about the person in question now, writes police attorney Benedicte Granerud in the East police district in an email to Fredrikstad Blad.
according to NRK’s investigations, the arrested person is a Swedish man, previously convicted and connected to a criminal network in Halden, which the police believe is “a danger to democracy“.
Granerud informs Fredriksstad Blad that the Finnish woman who was arrested in Sweden on Monday was extradited to Norway on Wednesday.
– She will be produced for remand today.
From before, two people are in custody: a Swedish man, and a man from Østfold, who, according to the police, has connections to the criminal network in Halden.
It was on 21 October that explosives were found in a garden on the east side of Fredrikstad. The police’s hypothesis is that the explosives were placed in the wrong place.
The police are cooperating with Swedish and Finnish police in the case, and a central hypothesis is that it is a criminal network with branches abroad.
#person #arrested #bomb #case #Fredrikstad
**Interview with Police Attorney Benedicte Granerud**
**Editor:** Thank you for joining us, Benedicte. The recent arrests in the bomb case in Fredrikstad have raised many questions in the community. Can you provide some insight into the significance of these arrests?
**Benedicte Granerud:** Thank you for having me. The arrests are indeed significant as they point to a larger criminal network that poses a threat not just locally but potentially to other communities as well. We believe this network has international connections, which complicates our investigation but also allows for greater cooperation with law enforcement in other countries.
**Editor:** Following the arrest of a Swedish man with prior convictions, how does the police assess the potential risk that these individuals pose to the public?
**Benedicte Granerud:** The assessment is based on their past behaviors, connections, and the nature of their current activities. In this case, the police have deemed the individuals connected to a dangerous network that poses risks to public safety and democracy itself.
**Editor:** Given the involvement of foreign criminal networks, how do you see this affecting community trust in law enforcement, especially if these incidents persist?
**Benedicte Granerud:** That’s an important concern. We understand that ongoing investigations can create unease in the community. It’s critical for us to keep the public informed and assure them that we’re doing everything possible to secure the area. We encourage community members to remain vigilant and report any suspicious activities.
**Editor:** In light of these recent events, what do you think the readers should consider regarding the balance between security measures and civil liberties?
**Benedicte Granerud:** That’s a fundamental question for society to grapple with. As we enhance security measures to combat criminal activities, it’s essential that we do so while respecting civil liberties. This balance is what helps maintain trust between law enforcement and the communities we serve.
**Editor:** Lastly, do you believe that the public’s fear about crime could lead to calls for more severe policing actions, and what might be the implications of that?
**Benedicte Granerud:** Increased fear can certainly push communities to advocate for stricter measures. However, it’s crucial for the public to engage in informed discussions about these issues. While a strong law enforcement response is necessary, community involvement and preventive strategies are equally important in creating a safe environment.
**Editor:** Thank you, Benedicte, for sharing your insights. As this case unfolds, it will be interesting to see how it shapes the conversation around crime and safety in our community.
—
**Debate Question for Readers:** Considering the recent bomb-related arrests and the police’s focus on criminal networks, how do you feel about the balance between enhanced security measures and the potential impact on personal freedoms? Do you believe increased policing is justified in the face of perceived threats, or do you think it could lead to infringements on civil liberties? Share your thoughts!
