2023-04-18 03:30:04
Javier Gandolfi’s Workshops, as well as that of Alexander Medina and further back with Frank Kudelka invites us to talk regarding the game, the objectives that are met and those that remain pending. In most of the games, the references had to do with the way in which Talleres sought to prevail. The match with San Lorenzo was no exception and, behind the 0-0, the news was how the “T” tried to break it with a new strategy and the way in which his rival adjusted to a known role and that adjusts to his reality, where he is better on the table than on the pitch.
The novelty was Gandolfi’s bet. The DT tried to solve the problem of attacking in confined spaces. The presence of Rodrigo Garro starting further back and the entry of Nahuel Bustos intended to break a short team like San Lorenzo that was going to give them the ball, a challenge that had already been presented to Colón.
The pretense of forcing him to become long and wide so that Valoyes and Pizzini would unbalance as Garro’s partners or in heads-ups were little or nothing fulfilled. Nor was there a complement between Santos and Bustos, and thus expectations were left halfway, a trend that might not change in the complement except in a few exceptions or due to the mistake of Augusto Batalla who committed a penalty once morest the kid Barrera, when Talleres was already looking for unbalance by stopped ball.
What went wrong? That the “T” ended up being the long team, which in many cases abused the balls and which Garro, in this essay, had a hard time driving.
Backwards the bet was also demanding. The bottom suffered when the ball reached Nahuel Barrios, although fortunately for him there were four chances, one of which hit the post and Herrera saved the other two.
What would have happened if Bustos or Santos converted? Would they have made the “Blanket” essay successful? The other way. If any of the rival entered, was it a failure? Neither one nor the other. Gandolfi is not fooled by the result and does submit to the evaluation offered by the game objectives met. The DT knows that the “T” should have won, but he also knows that it was not enough.
“With a rival that plays 5-4-1 you have to be very sharp. And there we were not so much. In game volume, we are below what we have been showing. Being in the first places shows that we are on the right path. But I am happy because we continue to grow in other aspects that I save for the internship, ”was his response.
That was the truth. There was a lack of precision and the production should have been higher. It is up to all the protagonists mentioned. Will Santos and “NB10″ be seen together from the beginning? Will Alan Franco return to double five with Rodrigo Villagra?
“I do not tie myself to any system: it is what I see on a day-to-day basis. I was very satisfied with the entry of Nahuel once morest Colón, who uses a system similar to that of San Lorenzo, and that is why I used it”, indicated the albiazul coach, who with this message also feeds an internal competition that has been weakened by so much injury.
Then, when asked if the team had lost two points once morest San Lorenzo, “Cobija” distanced himself and said: “Of the last 12 points we got 8. I would like to win all of them, but in this run we were up to par with the exception of first half once morest Colon. The team is growing in many points. The balance is positive. I don’t look at the rival, I look at my team and the goal is clear. I am going to continue saying that the first objective is to return to an international cup”.
1681811444
#Analysis #Gandolfi #Workshops #game #essays #positive #balance
