According to what “Israel Hayom” stated in its report, the Lebanese factions will withdraw their forces to the north of the Litani and will not renew their military deployment in the area between the Litani and the border with Israel. The Israeli army will also withdraw from the first line of Lebanese factions’ positions in Lebanon, which it currently controls, and will return. To the international border line.”
The report explained that “in the first sixty days after signing the agreement, the Lebanese army will destroy the remainder of Hezbollah’s infrastructure in the area between the border and the Litani.”
“Israel Hayom” reported that “the agreement will include international guarantees from the United States and Russia to prevent the re-arming of Hezbollah in Lebanon.” In this context, Syria will be responsible for preventing the transfer of weapons from its territory to Lebanon, contrary to the situation that prevailed in the years preceding the war.”
The newspaper pointed out that “in the event of any violation of the agreement, whether through the rearming of Hezbollah, or military harm inflicted by the organization on Israel or the Israelis, the Israeli army has the right to act against the violation or respond to it, and this activity is supported internationally.”
Israel Hayom noted, according to its information, that Israeli Minister of Strategic Affairs Ron Dermer left for Russia, according to Israeli Army Radio, and then to the United States, and that this was being done in order to complete and close the final details of the agreement. He is also expected to meet with President-elect Donald Trump.”
According to the Hebrew report, “Dermer is expected to present to Trump the main points for arranging a clear ceasefire on the Lebanese front. He will also be presented with the latest developments in the Iranian nuclear program and the prevailing fears in Israel that Iran will soon reach a nuclear bomb.”
It should be noted that Trump said during the election campaign that “the last thing that can be agreed upon is for Iran to possess a nuclear bomb.”
It is noteworthy that a political official confirmed last night (Saturday) to “Israel Hayom” that “there is real progress in the political settlement talks on the northern front.”
According to him, “This is a very good agreement for Israel and meets its interests optimally, and progress on it is very real.” On the other hand, the same party refused to provide details about the content of the agreement.
American officials told the Israeli newspaper Yedioth Ahronoth that a settlement on the northern front (with Lebanon) is possible soon.
According to what Yedioth Ahronoth reported, yesterday, Saturday, US President-elect Donald Trump sent a message to the administration of outgoing President Joe Biden stating the need to make progress on the issue of returning settlers to the north.
American officials testified that “the chances are increasing to reach a settlement in Lebanon under the leadership of Amos Hochstein, Biden’s envoy, and with the encouragement of Trump,” and according to them, “there are also major efforts to conclude a small prisoner exchange deal.”
For his part, the Secretary-General of the Lebanese Armed Forces, Naeem Qassem, confirmed last Wednesday that there will be no path to indirect negotiations on a ceasefire other than Israel stopping its attacks on Lebanon, as he explained: “The basis of any negotiation is built on two things: stopping the aggression and The ceiling for negotiation is to fully protect Lebanese sovereignty, and only developments on the battlefield, and not political movements, will put an end to hostilities, and there will be no path to indirect negotiations through the Lebanese state unless Israel stops its attacks on Lebanon.”
Source: “Israel Hayom” + RT
#Israeli #newspaper #reveals #details #agreement #drafted #ceasefire #Lebanon
**Interview with Dr. Miriam Cohen, Middle East Analyst**
**Interviewer:** Thank you for joining us today, Dr. Cohen. There are reports from “Israel Hayom” about a potential withdrawal of Lebanese factions and the Israeli army in the region. What are the implications of this agreement?
**Dr. Cohen:** Thank you for having me. The proposed withdrawal of Lebanese factions to the north of the Litani River, alongside the Israeli army’s return to the international border, suggests a significant shift in the security dynamics of the region. It may reduce immediate military tensions, but the effectiveness of such withdrawals largely depends on the enforcement of the agreement.
**Interviewer:** The report mentions international guarantees from the U.S. and Russia to prevent Hezbollah from rearming. How credible do you think these guarantees are?
**Dr. Cohen:** The involvement of both the U.S. and Russia may provide a framework for oversight; however, the success of these guarantees hinges on the willingness of all parties to adhere to the agreement. Both countries have their own interests in the region, which could complicate enforcement. Additionally, the situation on the ground is quite complex, with various local actors involved.
**Interviewer:** What role does Syria play in this agreement regarding the prevention of arms transfers to Hezbollah?
**Dr. Cohen:** Syria’s role is critical. Historically, it has been a conduit for weapon transfers to Hezbollah. If they are committed to preventing these transfers, it could effectively limit Hezbollah’s capabilities. However, Syria’s control over its territory is not absolute, and there are questions about how closely they can monitor and enforce this.
**Interviewer:** The agreement reportedly includes provisions allowing Israel to respond to violations. How might this affect future relations in the region?
**Dr. Cohen:** This provision could introduce a new layer of tension. If Israel perceives any rearming of Hezbollah or threats to its security, it might act preemptively, potentially leading to escalated retaliatory actions. Consequently, this could strain relations between Israel and its neighbors and complicate diplomatic efforts going forward.
**Interviewer:** Minister Ron Dermer’s discussions with President-elect Trump also stand out. How might U.S. leadership under Trump influence this situation?
**Dr. Cohen:** Trump’s administration has been vocal about preventing Iran from obtaining a nuclear bomb, and this focus will likely frame their policy towards both Hezbollah and broader regional security. This could lead to increased support for Israel and pressure on Iran, but it also risks provoking greater instability if not handled carefully.
**Interviewer:** Thank you, Dr. Cohen, for your insights on this developing situation.
**Dr. Cohen:** Thank you for having me. It’s certainly a critical time for the region, and we’ll have to watch how these developments unfold.
