MEXICO CITY.- During his usual morning conference this Thursday, the President of Mexico, Andres Manuel Lopez Obradorstated that the university students Those who have created a movement against his reform to elect the Judiciary by popular vote are “deceived.”
The president questioned that the law students of the National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM), the one with the largest enrollment in Latin America, joined the Protest by judges and employees of the judiciary against the Government’s initiative.
“There are demonstrations by young people from the UNAM School of Law And I want to tell them, I want to refer to them, those who are studying law, because they have teachers who, surely, are telling them that it is unfair and illegal to carry out a reform to the Judicial Branch or antidemocratic, they are deceiving them,” he argued.
The Mexican ruler referred to the mobilization of thousands of university students on Wednesday, when they marched from the Faculty of Law to the Federal Judicial Council (CJF) to denounce that the Reform would affect the judicial career and would allow the interference of “foreign interests” in justice.
But the president dismissed the criticism, reaffirming that “neoliberal” ideology has permeated UNAM, whose students tend to mobilize for leftist causes.
“I regret what happened during the neoliberal period, how they destroyed my alma mater. So, just so that young people have all this information: What does the reform mean? It means cleaning up this corruption, ensuring that these abuses never happen again and ending hypocrisy,” he said.
The students have called for a march against judicial reform this Sunday, when López Obrador will deliver his last official State of the Union address, in which they expect students from the Universidad Iberoamericana, the Escuela Libre de Derecho and the Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México, among others, to march.
The president criticized the criticisms of specialists from UNAM and the Institute of Legal Research (IIJ) of said university.
“They want to teach us about legality, about the rule of law. What rule of law? They embody the crooked state, the state of bribery,” he said.
You may also like: “López Obrador: The “supermajority” in Congress is the “will of the people”“
Related
#AMLO #calls #UNAM #students #protesting #judicial #reform #deceived
2024-09-07 00:17:13
Table of Contents
Mexico’s President Andrés Manuel López Obrador Accuses University Students of Being “Deceived” Over Judicial Reform
In a recent press conference, Mexico’s President Andrés Manuel López Obrador (AMLO) sparked controversy by accusing university students of being “deceived” about his reform to elect the Judiciary by popular vote <a href="https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andr%C3%A9sManuelL%C3%B3pezObrador”>[1[1[1[1[1[1[1[1]. The reform has been met with resistance from students, particularly from the National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM), who claim it will allow for interference from “foreign interests” in the judicial system.
The President’s comments came in response to a protest by law students from UNAM, who marched from the Faculty of Law to the Federal Judicial Council (CJF) to express their opposition to the reform [2[2[2[2[2[2[2[2]. AMLO alleged that the students were being misled by their teachers, who were spreading misinformation about the reform. He stated, “There are demonstrations by young people from the UNAM School of Law… I want to tell them, I want to refer to them, those who are studying law, because they have teachers who, surely, are telling them that it is unfair and illegal to carry out a reform to the Judicial Branch or antidemocratic, they are deceiving them” [3[3[3[3[3[3[3[3].
However, the students and many legal experts disagree with the President’s assessment, arguing that the reform would indeed compromise the independence of the judiciary and allow for political interference. They claim that the reform would open the door to corruption and undermine the rule of law.
The controversy has sparked a heated debate about the role of the judiciary in Mexico and the potential consequences of AMLO’s reform. While the President claims that the reform is necessary to “clean up corruption” and “end hypocrisy,” his critics argue that it would only serve to further politicize the judiciary and undermine its independence.
As the debate continues, it remains to be seen how the reform will proceed and what its implications will be for the future of Mexico’s judicial system. One thing is certain, however: the controversy has highlighted the importance of protecting the independence of the judiciary and ensuring that it remains free from political interference.
References:
[1] Andrés Manuel López Obrador – Wikipedia. (n.d.). Retrieved from <https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andr%C3%A9sManuelL%C3%B3pezObrador>
[2] AMLO aconseja a estudiantes de derecho de la UNAM no … (n.d.). Retrieved from
[3] Todo el apoyo de AMLO a la Universidad de la Nación. (n.d.). Retrieved from
Mexico’s Controversial Judicial Reform: Understanding the Debate
Mexico’s President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador has pushed forward a radical reform of the country’s judicial system, which has sparked controversy and protests from university students, judges, and employees of the judiciary. The reform aims to overhaul the country’s judicial system, allowing for the election of judges by popular vote. However, critics argue that this change would compromise the independence of the judiciary and open the door to political interference and corruption.
What is the Judicial Reform About?
According to the approved text of the reform, the lower house of Mexico’s Congress has passed a constitutional amendment that would allow for the election of judges by popular vote [1[1]. This change has been met with resistance from the judiciary, as well as law students and professors from prominent universities, including the National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM) [2[2].
Why is the Reform Controversial?
Critics argue that the reform would undermine the independence of the judiciary, allowing for political interference and corruption to influence the selection of judges [3[3]. University students and professors have also expressed concerns that the reform would affect the judicial career and allow for the interference of “foreign interests” in justice.
President Lopez Obrador’s Response
President Lopez Obrador has dismissed the criticism, arguing that the reform would clean up corruption and end hypocrisy in the judiciary [[4]]. He has also accused UNAM law school teachers of deceiving students into protesting against the reform, suggesting that “neoliberal” ideology has permeated the university.
Protests and Resistance
The controversy surrounding the judicial reform has sparked protests from university students, judges, and employees of the judiciary. Thousands of students have mobilized against the reform, marching from the Faculty of Law to the Federal Judicial Council (CJF) to express their concerns. A march against the judicial reform is scheduled for this Sunday, coinciding with President Lopez Obrador’s last official State of the Union address.
Conclusion
Mexico’s judicial reform has sparked a heated debate, with proponents arguing that it would bring about much-needed change to the country’s judicial system, while critics warn that it would compromise the independence of the judiciary and open the door to corruption. As the reform moves forward, it remains to be seen how it will shape the country’s justice system and the rule of law.
References:
[1] Bloomberg. (2024, September 4). Mexico’s Lower House Passes Full Text of Judicial Reform.
[2] BBC. (2024, September 4). Controversial Mexican judicial reform passes key hurdle.
[3] The Washington Post. (2024, September 4). Why Mexico’s judicial reform is raising alarms about democracy.