Amending the “morality” of the Constitution seems to be the end of the road. “Spouses Committee-Amnesty” Course “2 Prime Minister Shinawatra”

2024-09-25 00:00:00

“Deja Vu” The Pheu Thai government’s hot-button constitutional amendment issue continues to circulate. Are there signs of political smoke brewing again?

“6 hot topics” Pheu Thai Party “Quietly lurking” A revised draft was submitted to Speaker of the House of Representatives Wan Mohamed Noor Mata. Went last weekend.

The big highlights are the questions.The “morality” of political officeholders Includes an obviously honest amendment to section 160 on ministerial qualifications(4). by editing it to “There is no clear behavior or action that indicates a lack of honesty. It shall be implemented from the date of promulgation of the Constitution. The revised version has been enforced.

(5) There is no violation or non-compliance with the regulationsstrict ethical standards Edited to clarify this must be a case currently before the Supreme Court and (7) a case not requiring a custodial sentence. Although that case is not closed or awaiting punishment unless you made an oversight mistake. Minor offenses or defamation offenses were revised to make such cases grounds for termination of ministerial duties and were instead conducted under Article 170.

In addition, it is also proposed to amend a set of provisions relating to honesty, integrity and ethics designated as ministerial qualifications, namely, Articles 201, 202, 222, 228, 232, 238 and 246 articles.

Of course, the question of amending the constitution belongs to Pheu Thai’s ethics arm. It is treated no differently than creating“Protective Armor” arrive “Prime Minister’s Ink” Baithonden Shinawatra In order not to make a second mistake after former Prime Minister “Settha Thaweesin”. Branded by the Constitutional Court as “unethical” or “not obviously dishonest”, these terms will from now on be carried over to various roles

Because if that were the case, there would be a risk of a political accident. Until power changes hands to other parties although at this point we are still in compromise mode.

In this situation, it is necessary to pay attention to the Pheu Thai Party government. Now with 324 votes in the House of Representatives (formerly Bueng Kan MP “Suwanna Kumphiro”‘s 325 votes) the Bumjetai Party was ordered by the court to cease performing its duties on September 18, 2024) only the ruling coalition votes in the “Lower House” if agreed is absolute. Everything will go smoothly, there is nothing to worry about. All that’s left is the “High Council” waiting for the blue cover.

Is the United Party’s “324 votes” dismantling a moral signal?

But when the signal is captured and the line is checked“United Party”including external signals “The Ultimate Power” below “Super deal” That may not be the case this time.

“Bhumjai Thai Party” before “Anutin Chavilakul” The Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of the Interior, as party leader, once spoke about this issue: If it is edited for clarity, there will be no problem.

Latest status after meeting September 24 Cabinet “Premier Mo” and “MT Nuuanutin”choir conquers competition “Back on board” The Unionist Party said on the issue that the matter had not yet been discussed by the Unionist Party. Now, we need to focus first on helping people.

The abnormal signal comes from “Blue Party” So what’s interesting is that another page is playing?

especially “Hot-Blooded Youth Bhumjaithai Gang” leader“Chaiciano Chichobu” The party’s position was also announced by Buriram MP and party secretary-general, Kornwee Prissananantakul, Angthong MP as a member of the party’s executive committee, South Wendita Somchai, Ubon Ratchathani MP and party spokesperson. . A few hours later, he said: Bhumjai Thai MPs meeting resolved to “agree” on constitutional amendments moving towards referendum

When asked by reporters to highlight the issue of amending some clausesethics The “son of champion Kornwei” reiterated his previous statement. If you want to change the Constitution, you should change the entire Constitution. The person who solves the problem must be a mediator from all aspects, so the party’s position is different from the past. We have always confirmed that if you want to amend the Constitution you should go to Article 256 and draft a complete new version. Except for amending Articles 1 and 2.

In response to a “Calaway” question, it was suggested that he reiterated his support for amending Article 256 of the Constitution to open the way for the appointment of members of Congress to draft a new constitution, which was interpreted as “opposition” to the proposed amendments on a clause-by-clause basis. Especially on moral issues, be diplomatic. There is no word “objection” written in the statement.

Interestingly, in addition to “Karawee”, there are also people who have come forward to express their views. Previously, there was a signal from “Pharadon Prissananantakul”, deputy leader of the Bhumjaithai Party. At this time, the person who suddenly came out to inform him of the news wearing the hat of deputy speaker of the House of Representatives was “Karawee”‘s brother. “Member of Parliament”

On the same day, “Pharadon” said that there is a question whether morality is a rule that must be strictly required for politicians. What do people think? Is this a solution that benefits politicians? Politicians cannot represent the people. Speakers must be citizens. Therefore, you must think carefully. This problem must be solved for the benefit of the people. The people choose their legislators to make the rules, including ethics. How strict will it be?

“Stakeholders did not listen to other MPs talking about it. Said it was dangerous and sensitive and there should be a referendum.

catch the rhythm“Blue Party” The roles played by the two brothers “Prinjananantakul”, sons of Panya Anthong, expressed their “disagreement” with the Pheu Thai Party’s clause-by-clause amendment to the constitution. It is considered to have interesting meanings. Especially “Faradon” who is now the vice president of the parliament. It controls the power of the House of Representatives to consider laws and agenda items. Does this portend some kind of bargaining game?

“Democrats-RTSC” From “Couples Commission-Amnesty” to “Morality”

and “Democratic Party” Recently, the red coalition government party has received a signal “Chaichana Dechidejo”The Deputy Secretary of the Party Leadership Group clearly announced “We do not support an ethics amendment because everyone entering this position must be willing to be scrutinized for ethical standards and existing ethics rules.”

Of course, timing “Blue Camp” Currently, we face challenges in the midst of a crisis. “Popularity” and“Belief” With almost no original capital left, he changed direction and joined the Pheu Thai government.

If you remember the days of the Pheu Thai government in the past, “Yingluck Shinawatra” A similar incident occurred towards the end of the prime minister’s reign.

Since the 2007 constitution proposed three draft amendments, including: 1. The draft amendment to Article 68 proposes: “Members of political parties or members of Congress are prohibited from running for Senate, but if they wish to run, they must be exempt from membership of a political party. OR Members of Congress must have been at least 5 years old to apply.

2. Draft Amendment 115, Senate Clause (5) originates from the question of disqualification, which states that “shall not be the parent, spouse or child of a person holding the office of a member” of the House of Representatives or of a person holding political office.

3. Which contract does the draft amendment to Article 190 involve? There is a chapter on changing the territory of Thailand. or areas outside Thailand that are sovereign or have jurisdiction under contract or under international law

The focus is on drafts 1 and 2, the first agenda item for the Senate’s consideration of the issue and the 5-year ban. Weitai still reserves the right to prohibit such questions. But Mr. Tay, who had a majority in the House of Representatives at the time when the law was passed in the first session and went to committee level, has been corrected to “remove all such information.”

When a few people are special “Democratic Party” At the time he was the leader of the opposition march. and was an opponent of the Shinawatra camp. Unable to challenge the majority In the end we had to fight in Parliament. Vote on Agenda Part 2

Opposition parties at the time, including conservative senators, had dissected the root of the problem. The senator took it with it and it opened the way to becoming “Couples Committee” in the end

As the political situation at that time had matured, the Pheu Thai Party was well aware of the suspicious signs. Finally he dropped the question.“Couples Committee”and maintain the barring status proposed in the first agenda

“Amnesty” is a cool way to go home.

In addition to the three draft constitutional amendments that were a precursor to political brewing, the last straw that broke the Pheu Thai Party and “Prime Minister Yingluck Shinawatra” Must step down as PDRC rally leads to coup, i.e. leave Amnesty Law

Started with“People’s Edition” After sharpening, it becomes“Alley Version” open circuit”Big boss.Pheu Thai Party goes home“In a cool way”

When this happens the Democratic Party, which used to be an opponent of the Shinawatra camp, used to strongly oppose the draft constitution and the Pheu Thai amnesty law until now, even though it has transformed into a coalition government party, but if you continue to defend the law in question, it becomes “End of the Alley Second Edition”

Of course, in addition to being questioned about profit-making games. Under the change of position, the consequences will be only losses and losses. Since popularity has plummeted no matter what you do it becomes more and more negative.

and “Nguyen Thai Sang National Party” The guerrillas were at the forefront of the political scene during the past government era. Moreover, at that time he was also hostile to Pheu Thai. Unlike the Democrats, this will inevitably be questioned. If you still insist on supportingThe “(Important) End of the Alley” version of the draft constitution

As a result, a meeting of MPs agreed on a joint resolution on ethical standards for politicians. What the Constitution provides is appropriate. In order to get honest, truthful, transparent politicians without any blemishes, therefore, the Lumte Santu Party voted against changing the ethical standards for politicians. Constitutional provisions

The Pheu Thai Party must recognize the times “Sun Tzu Mo” There are lessons from the age of government. “Apu” It’s come, even though at this point he controls the majority of the House but you have to be able to assess the value of it – it’s worth it.

Because if politics were to cycle back to what it was before, the forces now seemed to be on the same page. It might become Pheu Thai. The “Mexican Prime Minister” will be the one who made the mistake, and his actions will eventually cause some power groups to seek “downfall.”

1727226097
#Amending #morality #Constitution #road #Spouses #CommitteeAmnesty #Prime #Minister #Shinawatra