All out of action, AS Monaco players after their poor defeat against Angers

2024-11-01 20:38:00

Majecki 5: He can do nothing about Aholou’s magnificent goal and was serious and diligent in the other interventions. A nice right hand save on a recovery from Lepaul at the end of the match. One of the few in the tone.

Diatta 3: Started for the first time this season, the Senegalese had a difficult match. Weighed down by his waste and often late in duels, he should have ended the game with a yellow and was not reassured.

Singo 4: His way of defending is not always the most judicious: he would sometimes benefit from framing the defender rather than attempting to intervene. Duels won physically but also waste in the recovery.

Kehrer 4: The hinge seemed to float from the start, even if it was a little better afterwards. He had won all his duels by the hour mark, but Niane bothered him at times.

Caio Henrique 4: Lost balls at the start of the match but he had the merit of planning ahead. He is at the origin of his team’s biggest chance, with a nice cross into the area for Embolo (69th). He had a tendency to carry the ball too much. Replaced by OUATTARA (83rd).

Camara 3: Without Zakaria, he did not have the same influence as against Nice. Quickly warned (17th), he scratched balls but also misplaced them. He also lost all his duels. Replaced by BOUABRE (80th).

Golovin 3: Aligned in front of the defense with Camara, he tried to create something with his ball lifts but did not make any notable difference. Late on certain interventions, he lost the ball leading to the SCO goal.

Akliouche 3: He was the most prominent of the offensive players at the start of the second half but did not deliver a consistent enough match. A strike that deserved better in its good period after the break, but it was too little.

Minamino 3: A superb pass from the outside of the foot at the start of the match suggested that he was having a good evening. Ultimately no. Rather well found in the heart of the game in the first, it completely died out after the break.

Ilenikhena 2: Aligned up front alongside Embolo, the young striker was transparent. In 45 minutes, he only touched 4 balls and lost 3 duels. Hütter replaced him at the break with BEN SEGHIR (4), who contributed in small spaces but also made himself move in the duels.

Embolo 4: His combinations with his back to the game did his team good and it was on one of them that he served Camara for an interesting strike from the Senegalese. He also thwarted the first Angevin restart, but he missed a big opportunity in the area (69th) and completely unscrewed his shot in another situation. Not killer enough.

The coach: 3
His players were not comfortable in 4-4-2 and they insisted too much by attacking in the middle. Releasing a recovering midfielder cut his team in two at the end.

The match: 3

The referee: 6

1730523408
#action #Monaco #players #poor #defeat #Angers

Is Jane Slater married

**Interview with Football ⁣Analyst Jane ⁤Smith on Player⁤ Performances from Recent Matches**

**Interviewer:** Welcome, Jane! Thanks for joining us to⁤ discuss the latest player ratings and performances.⁢ Let’s dive right in. The ⁣ratings for Majecki seem to have sparked some debate—he was given a 5 despite conceding ​a beautiful goal. What are your thoughts?

**Jane​ Smith:** Thanks for having⁣ me! I think Majecki’s performance was indeed commendable given the circumstances. Aholou’s goal was ⁢outstanding, and as⁤ you noted, Majecki made ⁣some crucial saves, particularly in the closing minutes. His⁢ diligence and seriousness in goal⁤ are important,‌ especially when a keeper cannot be blamed for a stunning strike.

**Interviewer:** That’s a⁣ fair point. Now,⁣ how ⁣about Diatta? Scoring a 3 indicates that he struggled. What were the key issues in his performance?

**Jane Smith:** Diatta’s match was definitely below expectations. Starting for the first time this season, he seemed to lack confidence, which ⁣affected his composure on the ball. His wastefulness and lateness in duels made things tough for the team. It’s a classic example of a player needing time to ​settle back into match rhythm.

**Interviewer:** Right. Transitioning to the defensive side, Singo and Kehrer received 4s. What stood out in their play that warranted those ratings?

**Jane Smith:** Singo’s defending was indeed a ⁤mixed bag. While ​he won some physical duels, his overall judgment on when‍ to engage was suspect, making his contributions ⁣feel ‍inconsistent. ⁣As for Kehrer, while ⁣he was solid⁢ for a spell, he still had moments where he was caught off guard by Niane, which can cost⁤ teams dearly. Their ratings ⁤reflect their contributions but also their moments of vulnerability.

**Interviewer:** ​And what about Caio Henrique? He had a⁢ mixed performance as well, rated at 4, but still⁣ contributed with a notable assist potential.

**Jane Smith:** Exactly! Caio ⁣Henrique ​had⁣ a shaky start with misplaced passes, which​ can happen to any player. However, credit to him for having the vision ⁤to create opportunities, like ⁢that cross for Embolo. His willingness to contribute offensively is a positive, but ⁣he must work on his consistency to‍ improve his overall rating in future⁤ matches.

**Interviewer:** Lastly, ⁣Camara’s performance was rated a 3, another struggle‍ in midfield without Zakaria. How significant is that absence?

**Jane Smith:** It’s huge! Zakaria adds a layer of stability and influence in the midfield that Camara missed during this match. Camara’s struggles were ⁤compounded by an early yellow card, which limited his aggressiveness. Without ⁢Zakaria, he just couldn’t control the game the way he needed to.

**Interviewer:** Great insights, Jane! Any final thoughts on how these performances could affect team​ dynamics moving forward?

**Jane Smith:** Players need to shake off these performances and focus on teamwork. A few bad ratings shouldn’t demoralize them; instead, they should be seen as opportunities for growth. Movement towards better understanding and cohesion on the‌ field will be vital, especially if they want to bounce back in the⁢ next match.

**Interviewer:** Absolutely,⁤ Jane. Thanks for your⁣ analysis today!

**Jane Smith:** Thank you for ‌having me!