The Islamabad High Court has sought a response from the jail authorities till October 31 on the request of Chief Minister Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Ali Amin Gandapur to meet Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) founder chairman Imran Khan in jail.
Islamabad High Court Justice Arbab Muhammad Tahir heard Ali Amin Gandapur’s request for a prison meeting with Imran Khan.
The Islamabad High Court, while seeking a reply from the jail authorities by October 31, ordered that the authorized officer of the jail should appear before the court on October 31.
Justice Arbab Muhammad Tahir issued a written order for today’s hearing.
It should be noted that the Islamabad High Court issued a notice to the Superintendent of Adiala Jail on October 23 for not meeting Imran Khan with his sister Noreen Niazi.
Later, PTI lawyers were allowed to meet Imran Khan on a court order, during which Faisal Chaudhry claimed that fundamental rights of PTI founder were being violated in jail.
On this occasion, the Additional Attorney General told the court that the government has no intention of banning meetings in jails and could not comment if anything happens later.
It should be noted that on October 7, meeting with all prisoners, including Imran Khan, was banned in Adiala Jail till October 18, however, the ban on meeting with ordinary prisoners, including political ones, was further extended.
Sources said that the ban on prison meetings will continue for the time being, the ban on meetings was extended by the Punjab government.
Notice issued to the parties on the petition filed against the withdrawal of prison facilities from Imran Khan
On the other hand, the Islamabad High Court issued notices to the Interior Secretary, Law Secretary, Home Department Punjab and the Superintendent of Adiala Jail on the petition filed by former Prime Minister Imran Khan against withdrawing prison facilities. Do appear in court with relevant records and written reply.
Islamabad High Court Justice Arbab Muhammad Tahir heard the petition of Noreen Niazi, advocate Shoaib Shaheen appeared in the court on behalf of the petitioner and stated that the B class facilities in the jail were withdrawn from the founder PTI, which he Rights, newspaper, TV, exercise facilities have been withdrawn from founder PTI.
He further said that the electricity of founder PTI’s cell was also turned off, children are not being talked to on the phone, all these facilities were closed illegally without any reason, which is also a violation of court orders. Yes, imprisonment means restriction of personal freedom, imprisonment does not mean denial of basic human rights.
The court allowed the petitioner’s counsel to bring on record the court orders related to founder PTI’s jail facilities, saying that they can bring the court orders on record through a miscellaneous application.
#Ali #Amin #Gandapurs #request #meeting #Imran #Khan #sought #response #prison #authorities #Pakistan
**Interview with Legal Expert on Imran Khan’s Meeting Request**
**Interviewer:** Thank you for joining us today. We’re discussing the recent developments regarding Imran Khan’s imprisonment and the Islamabad High Court’s response to Chief Minister Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Ali Amin Gandapur’s request to meet him. Can you provide some context on why this meeting request is significant?
**Guest:** Thank you for having me. The significance of this request lies in its implications for political transparency and the rights of detainees. Imran Khan, as the founder chairman of the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), holds considerable political weight, and his interactions, especially with fellow party leaders, could influence ongoing political dynamics in Pakistan. Ali Amin Gandapur’s request to meet him highlights concerns regarding access and the fundamental rights of political figures in detention.
**Interviewer:** The Islamabad High Court has directed the jail authorities to respond by October 31. What does this timeline suggest about the court’s stance on the matter?
**Guest:** The court’s prompt action indicates that it is taking the issue seriously. By setting a deadline for the jail authorities to respond and requiring an officer to appear in court, it reflects a judicial commitment to uphold the rights of prisoners. This approach suggests that the court is not only concerned with procedural matters but is also attentive to potential violations of fundamental rights.
**Interviewer:** There have been previous incidents of imposed restrictions on Imran Khan’s meetings, including a recent ban until October 18. How do these restrictions impact the situation?
**Guest:** Restricting meetings with prisoners, especially high-profile ones like Imran Khan, can lead to significant public and political backlash. It raises questions about the transparency of the judicial process and the ability of political leaders to maintain communication with their supporters and colleagues. Such restrictions can be interpreted as a means to silence dissent and control narratives, further fueling public discontent.
**Interviewer:** PTI lawyers have raised concerns that Imran Khan’s fundamental rights are being violated in prison. What legal mechanisms exist for addressing these claims?
**Guest:** In Pakistan, detainees can challenge their treatment through writ petitions filed in the High Courts. If a party believes that their fundamental rights are being infringed upon, they have the right to seek judicial intervention. Given the High Court’s willingness to hear these requests, we may see further legal actions taken to protect Imran Khan’s rights and ensure that he can meet with his legal team and political supporters.
**Interviewer:** In light of the ongoing situation, what do you foresee as possible outcomes of the Islamabad High Court’s involvement?
**Guest:** The court’s involvement could lead to a reaffirmation of prisoners’ rights, potentially allowing for more regular access to meetings and legal representation. Alternatively, if the authorities do not comply with the court’s orders, it could escalate tensions between the judiciary and the government, leading to further legal challenges or public demonstrations. The situation is fluid, and the court’s ruling could set a significant precedent for the treatment of political prisoners in the future.
**Interviewer:** Thank you for your insights. This situation continues to develop, and it’s vital for the public to stay informed on these crucial issues.
**Guest:** Thank you for having me. It’s important to monitor these developments closely, as they will have lasting implications for Pakistan’s political landscape.
