Indictment Fuels Controversy Surrounding Iberni’s Death
Former high-ranking Federal Police officials, Roman Di Santo and Luis Alberto Heiler, find themselves facing legal consequences for their roles in the heavily scrutinized investigation surrounding the death of Argentine prosecutor Alberto Nisman.
Prosecutor Eduardo Taiano, leading
the inquiry into Nisman’s death, formally requested these charges, citing “serious irregularities” that significantly compromised the integrity of the crime scene.
A Disturbed Scene: Questions Arise Over Evidence Handling
On January 18, 2015, Nisman was discovered deceased from a gunshot wound in his Le Parc apartment. The chaotic aftermath saw over 60 individuals entering the apartment, contaminating the scene and jeopardizing the collection of crucial evidence. Among the concerning oversights was the failure to identify a third access route to the apartment, and the lack of temperature measurement of both the body and the surrounding environment.
échanges revealed that there were at least 31 communications between the two in those hours. And of which 18 were carried out by the former president. These data raise questions about the coordination and management of the crime scene.
“The mishandling of the scene was so severe it resembled the passage of a ‘herd of buffaloes,'” statedrenowned forensic expert Osvaldo Raffo, highlighting the extent of the contamination. Even more baffling, traces of one of the prefects tasked with preserving the scene were found, while no traces of Nisman himself were discovered.
Di Santo Deflects Blame, Implicates Berni
Di Santo, who headed the Federal Police from 2012 to 2016, has mounted a defense claiming he acted solely under orders issued by then-Secretary of Security Sergio Berni.
He asserted that Berni directed his presence at the scene and that he acted as an “assistant of Justice,” refraining from interfering with the technical tasks of his subordinates. “I did not give any illegal orders,” Di Santo maintained, dismissing the accusation against him as “far-fetched.”
Berni’s Communications Ignite Suspicion
Berni, who was also present at Nisman’s apartment, initially claimed to have had only two communications with former President Cristine Kirchner on the morning of Nisman’s death. However, expert analysis of telephone exchanges revealed a significantly higher number of communications between the two: at least 31 in total, with 18 originating from Kirchner’s phone. This revelation adds another layer of complexity and raises questions about their level of coordination and the management of the crime scene.
A Shadow Over the Investigation
The handling of the Nisman case has been relentlessly criticized. Eyewitnesses have reported individuals eating and drinking amidst the ongoing investigation, and the gun used in Nisman’s death was reportedly cleaned with toilet paper, potentially destroying crucial fingerprint evidence.
These actions have made it significantly more challenging to gather the evidence needed to definitively determine the circumstances surrounding Nisman’s death.
Broader Implications: Justice Seeks Answers
The indictment of Di Santo and Heiler marks the beginning of a potentially even wider-reaching investigation.
Justice is diligently considering whether other officials present at the scene, including those in superior positions like Berni, will face greater scrutiny.
The Nisman case continues to be a source of intense controversy and uncertainty, leaving a lingering mystery hanging over Argentina’s recent history.
1733341039
#Alberto #Nisman #Case #Justice #charged #Federal #crime #scene #large #number #irregularities
What are the implications of the claim that a prefect’s traces were found at the Nisman crime scene, but not the victim’s?
## Interview with Forensic Expert on Nisman Case
**Host:** Welcome back to the show. We’re continuing our discussion on the shocking developments in the Alberto Nisman case. Joining us today is renowned forensic expert Dr. Maria Garcia, who has been closely following the investigation. Dr. Garcia, thank you for being here.
**Dr. Garcia:** It’s my pleasure to be here.
**Host:** Let’s dive right in. The indictment of former police officials Di Santo and Heiler alleges “serious irregularities” at the Nisman crime scene. What’s your take on this?
**Dr. Garcia:** The reported mishandling of the crime scene is deeply troubling. As a forensic expert, I can’t stress enough how crucial a pristine and undisturbed crime scene is for a thorough investigation. Over 60 individuals entering Nisman’s apartment? It paints a scene of utter chaos. This level of contamination could have irrevocably compromised valuable evidence, potentially hindering the pursuit of justice.
**Host:** The article mentions a lack of temperature measurement at the scene and the failure to identify a third access route. How could these oversights impact the investigation?
**Dr. Garcia:** Time of death calculations, crucial for piecing together the timeline, heavily rely on accurate body temperature readings. Neglecting this vital step introduces uncertainty, further complicating the already complex puzzle. Similarly, overlooking a potential access point raises concerns about whether all possible entry and exit routes have been thoroughly examined.
**Host:** We’ve also heard the shocking claim that a prefect’s traces were found at the scene, yet none of Nisman’s. Can you shed some light on this?
**Dr. Garcia:** This is astonishing. It defies basic forensic principles. The absence of the victim’s traces while those of investigators are present raises serious questions about the handling of the body and the overall scene security protocols. [1](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_Alberto_Nisman)
**Host:** There seem to be conflicting accounts, with Di Santo claiming he acted on orders from then-Secretary of Security Sergio Berni. What are your thoughts on this blame-shifting?
**Dr. Garcia:** It’s a classic tactic in cases involving high-pressure situations. Shifting responsibility, regardless of its validity, ultimately undermines the quest for truth. A transparent and accountable investigation requires all parties involved, regardless of their rank, to take full responsibility for their actions and omissions.
**Host:** This case has been riddled with controversy from the start. Do you think these new indictments will bring us closer to the truth about Nisman’s death?
**Dr. Garcia:** It’s a step in the right direction. By holding those responsible for the mishandling of the scene accountable, we send a clear message that justice cannot be obstructed. The pursuit of the truth in this case is long overdue, and it is imperative that all those involved face the consequences of their actions.
