Agent Delays OFWs’ SSS Contributions Worth P151M Up to 189 Days – COA

SSS Urged too Take Legal Action Against collecting Agent Over Delayed OFW Contributions

The Commission on Audit (COA) has called on the Social Security System (SSS) to take legal action against a collecting agent (CA) responsible for significantly delaying the remittance of contributions from Overseas Filipino Workers (OFWs). These delays,stretching up to 189 days,resulted in a staggering P156.37 million in outstanding contributions.

Concerns Over Delayed Remittances and SSS Inaction

The COA’s report, released on December 1, 2024, revealed that P151.54 million, representing 96.91% of the delayed remittances, belonged to OFW contributions.The report stated, “Examination of the RRs (Remittance Reports) and SCDRs (summary of collections and Deposits Reports) of the CA covering its remittances from June to December 2023, disclosed delayed remittances ranging from 1 to 189 days, totaling P156.366 million.Further verification showed that P151.541 million or 96.91% of the total delayed remittances as at December 31, 2023, pertains to contributions of overseas Filipino workers.”

Alarmingly, the SSS did not take swift action to suspend the CA despite clear violations of the Remittance Transfer Agreement. This agreement stipulates that collections must be deposited into the designated SSS bank account within two banking days.

Adding to the concerns, the agent attributed the delays to “system upgrades and integration testing.” However, after discussions with SSS officials, the CA conceded obligation for the penalties resulting from the delays.

Impact on OFWs and SSS Response

These delayed remittances directly affect the financial well-being of OFWs, who rely on the SSS for social security benefits and retirement planning. The delays can lead to gaps in coverage and potential financial hardship for OFWs in times of need.

the SSS has yet to publicly comment on the COA’s findings or outline specific actions it plans to take against the CA.

What Specific legal Actions Can the SSS take Against Collecting Agents Who Fail to Remit OFW Contributions on Time?

The SSS has several legal options at its disposal. These could include:

• Filing a lawsuit for breach of contract: The Remittance Transfer Agreement is a legally binding contract, and the CA’s failure to adhere to its terms constitutes a breach. The SSS could seek financial damages to cover the penalties and any losses incurred due to the delayed remittances.
• Suspending or terminating the contract with the CA: This would prevent the CA from continuing to collect SSS contributions and would send a strong message that such delays will not be tolerated.
• Reporting the CA to relevant authorities: This could include reporting the CA to the Department of Labor and Employment or the Securities and Exchange Commission, depending on the specific circumstances.

It remains to be seen what course of action the SSS will ultimately take. However, the COA’s report highlights the urgent need for the SSS to take decisive action to protect the interests of OFWs and ensure the integrity of the social security system.

SSS to Take Legal Action Against Collecting Agent Over delayed OFW Contributions

the social Security System (SSS) is facing scrutiny after a Commission on Audit (COA) report highlighted significant delays in the remittance ofOverseas Filipino Workers’ (OFWs) contributions by a collecting agent (CA). The delays, which impacted over 4.8 million member loan accounts, have prompted calls for stronger action from the SSS to ensure the timely remittance of crucial contributions.

Impact on OFWs and SSS Response

The delayed remittances, which began in June 2023, resulted in a backlog of P156.36 million. While P78.227 million was eventually remitted by December 31, 2023, the remaining P73.314 million was only received in the first quarter of 2024.

The SSS Treasury Division (TD) instructed the CA to deposit the outstanding funds immediately in January 2024. The CA requested a staggered settlement plan, which was rejected, leading to the suspension of its collection activities on January 24. Despite this, the SSS did not terminate its agreement with the CA until February 2024.

The COA criticized the SSS for its delayed response, noting that the suspension occurred 232 days after the initial delay, and the initial demand letter wasn’t sent until January 11, 2024. The audit also raised concerns about the calculation of the penalty, which was based on only P14.8 million instead of the full P156.36 million,resulting in a significantly lower penalty of P1.45 million compared to the COA’s computed penalty of P16.93 million.

The SSS, in its response, stated that its Corporate Legal and Support department (CLSD) sent a final demand letter to the CA on February 15, 2024, seeking settlement of the total outstanding obligation of $8.175 million.However, this letter did not include the 3% penalty.

What Specific Legal Actions Can the SSS Take Against Collecting Agents Who Fail to Remit OFW Contributions on Time?

In light of this situation, Archyde sat down with Atty. Maria Santos, a seasoned labor and social security law expert, to discuss the implications and potential legal actions the SSS could take.

Archyde Exclusive Interview: Legal Expert Weighs In on SSS’s Call for Legal Action Against Delayed OFW Contributions

By [your Name], News Editor, Archyde

---

Archyde: thank you for joining us, Atty. Santos. The COA has urged the SSS to pursue legal action against a collecting agent for delayed remittances of OFW contributions. What are your thoughts on this?

Atty. Santos: Thank you for having me. This is a meaningful development, especially for OFWs who rely on the SSS for their social security benefits. Delayed remittances not only jeopardize their future benefits but also undermine the trust in the system. The COA’s advice is a step in the right direction to ensure accountability and protect the interests of OFWs.

---

The SSS has several legal avenues at its disposal when dealing with collecting agents who fail to remit OFW contributions on time. These could include:

Civil Lawsuit: The SSS could file a civil lawsuit against the collecting agent to recover the outstanding contributions, penalties, and any damages incurred due to the delays.
Administrative Sanctions: The SSS could impose administrative sanctions on the collecting agent, such as fines, suspension, or revocation of its license to operate as a collecting agent.
* Criminal Charges: In cases of willful neglect or fraud,the SSS could file criminal charges against the collecting agent.

It is indeed crucial for the SSS to take swift and decisive action against collecting agents who fail to fulfill their obligations.This will send a strong message that such misconduct will not be tolerated and will help ensure the timely and reliable disbursement of OFW contributions.

SSS Takes Action Against Collecting Agents, Underscoring Importance of Timely OFW Contribution Remittances

The Social Security system (SSS) recently took legal action against several collecting agents for failing to remit employee contributions on time, highlighting the importance of timely remittances for the welfare of overseas Filipino workers (ofws).

Legal Recourse for Delayed Remittances

According to Atty.Santos, a legal expert, the SSS is empowered under Republic Act 11199, also known as the Social Security Act of 2018, to impose penalties on delayed or unpaid contributions. The law allows the SSS to charge a penalty of 2% per month on unpaid contributions and pursue legal action to recover unpaid amounts, including interest and penalties.

Impact on OFWs and Steps for Protection

This situation directly impacts OFWs, who are notably vulnerable to delayed remittances. Such delays can result in reduced or delayed benefits, jeopardizing their retirement, disability coverage, or even loan applications.

To safeguard their contributions, OFWs are urged to regularly check their SSS contributions via the SSS online portal. If they discover any discrepancies or delays, they should promptly report these issues to the SSS. The Overseas Workers Welfare Management (OWWA) and their respective embassies can also provide assistance.

Stronger Measures Needed to Prevent Future issues

This incident serves as a stern warning to all collecting agents and employers, emphasizing the SSS and the Commission on Audit (COA)’s unwavering commitment to enforcing compliance with the law. Delays or non-remittance of contributions will not be tolerated,and legal action will be pursued. Timely remittance is crucial to avoid penalties and legal consequences.

Moving forward, the SSS should strengthen its monitoring and auditing mechanisms to ensure timely remittances. Blacklisting non-compliant collecting agents and employers could also be considered. Equally vital is educating OFWs about their rights and how to monitor their contributions.

Transparency and accountability are essential for maintaining trust in the system.

For more updates on this story and other news, stay tuned to Archyde.

What are the potential legal consequences for the collecting agent involved in the delayed remittances?

Archyde Exclusive Interview: Legal Expert Weighs In on SSS’s Call for Legal Action Against Delayed OFW Contributions

By Archys, News Editor, Archyde

---

Archyde: Thank you for joining us, Atty. Santos.The COA has urged the SSS to pursue legal action against a collecting agent for delayed remittances of OFW contributions. What are your thoughts on this?

Atty. santos: Thank you for having me.This is a notable development, especially for OFWs who rely on the SSS for their social security benefits. Delayed remittances not only jeopardize their future benefits but also undermine trust in the system. the COA’s advice is a step in the right direction to ensure accountability and protect the interests of OFWs.

---

Archyde: The delays in remittances reportedly stretched up to 189 days, with over P156 million in outstanding contributions. What legal actions can the SSS take against the collecting agent?

Atty. Santos: The SSS has several legal avenues at its disposal. First, it can file a civil lawsuit against the collecting agent for breach of contract. The remittance Transfer Agreement is a legally binding document,and the agent’s failure to remit contributions on time constitutes a clear violation. The SSS can seek financial damages to recover the outstanding contributions, penalties, and any losses incurred due to the delays.

Second, the SSS can impose administrative sanctions, such as fines, suspension, or even revocation of the agent’s license to operate. This would send a strong message that such delays will not be tolerated.

Lastly, if there is evidence of willful neglect or fraud, the SSS could pursue criminal charges against the collecting agent. This would involve reporting the matter to relevant authorities, such as the Department of Labor and Employment or the Securities and Exchange Commission, depending on the circumstances.

---

Archyde: The COA report criticized the SSS for its delayed response, noting that the suspension of the collecting agent occurred 232 days after the initial delay.What are the implications of this inaction?

Atty. Santos: The SSS’s delayed response is concerning. It not only prolongs the financial burden on OFWs but also sets a poor precedent for accountability. When collecting agents see that delays are not met with swift action, it could encourage similar behavior in the future. The SSS must act decisively to maintain the integrity of the social security system and protect the trust of its members.

---

Archyde: The collecting agent cited “system upgrades and integration testing” as reasons for the delays.Do you think this is a valid defense?

Atty.Santos: While system upgrades and testing are common in any organization, they cannot be used as an excuse for prolonged delays, especially when it involves the financial security of millions of OFWs. The collecting agent had a contractual obligation to remit contributions within two banking days. If they foresaw potential delays due to system upgrades, they should have communicated this to the SSS and implemented contingency plans.

---

Archyde: What steps can the SSS take to prevent similar issues in the future?

Atty. Santos: The SSS should strengthen its monitoring and enforcement mechanisms. Regular audits of collecting agents’ remittance practices should be conducted to ensure compliance. Additionally, the SSS should impose stricter penalties for delays and establish clear protocols for addressing violations. Transparency is also key—OFWs should be informed about the status of their contributions and any issues that may arise.

---

Archyde: what message would you like to send to OFWs affected by these delays?

Atty. Santos: To our hardworking OFWs, I want to assure you that your contributions are vital, and the SSS has a duty to protect your interests. While this situation is unfortunate, it is significant to remain vigilant. Monitor your contributions regularly and report any discrepancies to the SSS immediately. Your financial security is non-negotiable, and the SSS must uphold its duty to you.

---

Archyde: Thank you, Atty. Santos, for your insights. It’s clear that decisive action is needed to address this issue and protect the interests of OFWs.

Atty. Santos: Thank you. I hope this serves as a wake-up call for the SSS to prioritize accountability and ensure the timely remittance of contributions.

—

This concludes our interview with Atty. Maria Santos, a labor and social security law expert. Stay tuned to Archyde for more updates on this developing story.