After two months an agreement was reached with the Mapuches that prevented road work in La Angostura

Today, in Villa La Angostura, the conciliation and dialogue hearing was held between representatives of the provincial Executive, the construction company Codi Conevial ​​Constructora Vial Agro (UTE) and the Paicil Antriao communities, the Lafkenche Zonal Council and the Indigenous Participation Council.

An act was signed in which the province, represented by the State Attorney, Raúl Gaitán, promised to complete the territorial survey of the community with the delivery of the technical file.

The community promised to abandon all direct actions as of the date (of the minutes), which implies setting up camp, disarming buildings and leaving the trace free of occupants, thus allowing the immediate resumption of work on the construction site. National Route 40, section of the Villa La Angostura ring road.

Meanwhile, from the construction company they expressed their commitment to immediately deliver the work plan that guarantees the access road to Cerro Belvedere, as it is a road of primary community use.

The minutes add that the parties agreed to advance in the disposition in view of the corresponding plans on the rest of the trace where the families are located and to carry out the topographic measurements that are considered necessary.

The agreement upholds that by virtue of the advanced state of the works and without renouncing the community’s right to future works, it is not opportune to carry out prior, informed and mandatory consultation in this case.

In addition, it was established that the new constructions will be carried out on community property.

Joaquín Pessagg, Daniel Pedre and Guillermo Hensel participated in the hearing for the company, while the State Attorney Raúl Gaitán and Gustavo Kohon did for the province. Belmar Loncon, community Werken, participated for the Paicil Antriao community; Damian Olivero, Lonko; Lucas Quintupuray, coordinator of the Lafkenche Zonal Council, and Nahuel Florentino for the Indigenous Participation Council.


To comment on this note you must have your digital access.
Subscribe to add your opinion!

Subscribe

Leave a Replay