A wife filed a divorce lawsuit for damages once morest her husband, following 6 months of marriage, before the Family Court in Heliopolis, in which she demanded that they be separated due to the impossibility of the ten and her fear for herself because of her husband’s bullying of her, to confirm: “She left the marital home following 6 months, and decided to obtain a divorce and following refusing My husband divorced me, and I decided to go to the family court, following I had a bad psychological condition because he used to make fun of my appearance in front of his mother and sisters.”
The wife indicated: “He tried to take me by force from my family’s house, but I refused to submit to his violence, so he almost killed me following he put me into a death lick, and caused me multiple injuries, following which I filed a report once morest him with a medical report, and I pursued him with a claim of imprisonment.”
And she continued: “I was defamed, so I filed a lawsuit once morest him to obtain compensation, unlike the squandering lawsuit, and the expenses were frozen, following he refused to divorce me and seized my legal rights registered in the marriage contract.”
She added: “He bargained with me to leave my legal rights, and his violence once morest me increased, because of his mother’s instigation, to live in hell, which prompted me to escape from his grip and resort to my family and request a divorce for harm.”
It is mentioned that according to the Personal Status Law, divorce is the dissolution of the valid marital bond, with the expression of explicit divorce, or with a phrase that takes its place, issued by the one who owns it, who is the husband or his deputy, and defined by the Supreme Constitutional Court, as he is one of the marriage teams in which the valid marriage is dissolved by a specific and explicit wording that was Or a metaphor?
And Article 22 of Law No. 1 of 2000, which states: “Without prejudice to the wife’s right to prove her divorced husband’s recourse to her by all means of proof, and upon denial, the husband’s claim of his divorced woman’s recourse is not accepted, unless he informs her of this revocation by official paper, before the expiration of sixty days for whom She menstruates ninety days for the one who promised her in the months, from the date of documenting his divorce to her, unless she is pregnant or acknowledges that her waiting period has not expired until announcing her reconsideration.
