Agadir 24 | Agadir24
The National Education Union placed the file “Teachers of Cell 10” on the table of the new Minister of National Education, Primary Education and Sports.
Muhammad Saad Barada.
In this context, the union wrote to the newly appointed minister to inform him about the download of Article 81 of Decree 2.24.140, which is considered the statute for employees of the Ministry in charge of National Education.
The union affiliated with the Democratic Confederation of Labor reported that the situation is still unclear with regard to Article 81, which concerns the masters of cell 10 and graduates of grade 9, stressing the need to adhere to the December 26 agreement by adding 5 legal years and considering it as a reason for the ceiling.
In its correspondence, the union considered that this activation “is the only way to close the file of this category within the agreed-upon horizon, and to lift the oppression and suffering that have befallen it for many years.”
Accordingly, the union called on the Minister of National Education, Primary Education and Sports to take the necessary measures for the correct and positive application of this article, to avoid any renewal of congestion in the educational system.
It should be noted that the professors of cell block 10 had previously waged protests in order to submit their demands to the guardian ministry, which includes exceptional promotion with retroactive financial and administrative effect for all professors who graduated from cell block 9, as a matter of fairness and reparation.
#union #places #file #Teachers #Cell #table #Minister #National #Education
**Interview with Meryem El Khalfi, Education Reform Advocate**
**Editor**: Meryem, thank you for joining us today. There has been significant discussion around the National Education Union’s recent actions concerning the “Teachers of Cell 10” and the controversial Article 81. What are your thoughts on the union’s insistence on activating this article as a means to resolve the ongoing issues faced by these educators?
**Meryem El Khalfi**: Thank you for having me. I believe the union’s push for Article 81 is a crucial step in addressing the long-standing grievances of teachers in Cell 10. Activating this article could indeed provide a semblance of justice and recognition for their years of service and struggle.
**Editor**: Many faculty members and stakeholders in the education sector have expressed concern regarding the potential implications of this activation. How do you see the balance between advocating for educators’ rights and maintaining stability within the educational system?
**Meryem El Khalfi**: It’s a delicate balance. While it’s essential to ensure that teachers are treated fairly and their contributions acknowledged, we also need to think carefully about how these changes impact the wider system. Striking a balance between fairness for individual educators and the cohesion of the educational framework is vital.
**Editor**: do you believe that pushing for exceptional promotions, as demanded by the professors of cell block 10, could set a precedent for other education professionals seeking similar recognition?
**Meryem El Khalfi**: Absolutely. If the demand for promotions and retroactive benefits is met, it may encourage other groups within the educational sector to voice their own grievances. This can foster significant debate about equity in the education system.
**Editor**: Readers, what do you think? Should the demands of Cell 10 professors be met, and what effect could this have on the broader educational landscape? We look forward to your insights and opinions on this pressing issue.
