There was not much common ground for future government work to be seen in an exceptionally unfriendly debate. The second duel between Green Party spokesman Werner Kogler and NEOS chairwoman Beate Meinl-Reisinger was much more pleasant.
Differences on tax issues
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
The concepts diverged in the black-red confrontation, particularly on the tax issue. While Babler stressed that “there is no way around” wealth taxes, Nehammer advocated tax relief. He called the wealth and inheritance taxes desired by the SP leader “pointless”. In general, one should not play entrepreneurs off against employees: “They must finally get away from the diction and dogmatism of the 1930s.” He likes being in the 1930s, Babler replied, only he is in the 21st century and Nehammer in the 100 years ago.
“Incredible aloofness”
The SP leader, who consistently accused the coalition of failing in the fight against inflation, accused Nehammer: “You want to continue to protect the super-rich.” Babler also identified a lack of respect for the financially weaker, as well as an “incredible aloofness.” The Chancellor was not going to accept that: “I am a Christian-Socialist.” The approach is also different from that of the SPÖ: “We are focusing on property, not on prefabricated buildings.” The SP leader, in turn, accused the VP leader: “You are the gravedigger of the political center in the country.”
Despite all the differences, neither of them ruled out a coalition with the other: “We will see later what constellations can look like in order to have a viable majority,” said Nehammer. A coalition with FPÖ leader Herbert Kickl will not be possible with him. Babler did not believe that. His party, on the other hand, would certainly not form a coalition with the Freedom Party, regardless of who its leader is: “That requires a bit of attitude.” The FPÖ is an “active part of the extreme right” with which no democratic state can be built.
The duel finally ended with a lively chatter, during which the spectators probably hardly understood a word.
Kogler and Meinl-Reisinger largely agree
The second confrontation, however, offered an opportunity to relax the tension. Kogler and Meinl-Reisinger were more or less in agreement on most issues and the duel between those who could provide a majority for the ÖVP and SPÖ also went well on a personal level. Meinl-Reisinger seemed almost relieved when she recognized differences for once: “They want more taxes, we want less.”
The NEOS were dissatisfied with the Greens when it came to filling positions. If a change of colour was green, that would not be any better. Kogler replied that many competent people who did not come from the Green camp had been put in top positions.
The NEOS leader made an effort to portray her party as a force for reform that a future government needs. “There must be courage and energy for a real reform coalition.” Meinl-Reisinger acknowledged that the Greens had achieved success, such as the Freedom of Information Act or the climate ticket. But now they need someone to tackle the structural reforms that they have lacked the courage to do so far. In any case, the NEOS have already been able to push through all of their coalition conditions in Vienna.
Kogler, in turn, concentrated on showing how positively the Greens’ participation in the government had affected the country, and not just by preventing a turquoise-blue coalition. He expressly acknowledged the approval of Climate Protection Minister Leonore Gewessler (Greens) in the matter of renaturation. Kogler was calm about the fact that this solo effort against the ÖVP could have cost him the chance of further participation in the government: “We’ll have to wait and see.”
ePaper
Austria far-right
Austrian Government: Coalition Talks Reveal Deep Divisions
In recent days, Austria has witnessed intense debate and negotiations among political parties as they vie for power and influence in the government. The discussions have been marked by deep divisions, particularly on tax issues, with different parties holding steadfast to their positions.
The debate began with a heated exchange between Socialist Party (SPÖ) leader Andreas Babler and Austrian People’s Party (ÖVP) leader Karl Nehammer, with the two parties displaying fundamentally different approaches to taxation. While Babler emphasized the need for wealth taxes, Nehammer advocated for tax relief, labeling the SPÖ’s proposed taxes as “pointless” [[1]]. The debate also touched on issues of respect for financially weaker segments of society, with Babler accusing Nehammer of “incredible aloofness” and prioritizing the interests of the super-rich.
Despite the disagreements, both parties left the door open for potential coalition talks, with Nehammer stating that they would “see later what constellations can look like in order to have a viable majority” [[1]]. However, Babler ruled out any possibility of cooperating with the Freedom Party of Austria (FPÖ), categorizing it as an “active part of the extreme right” that is incompatible with democratic values.
In contrast, the duel between Green Party spokesman Werner Kogler and NEOS chairwoman Beate Meinl-Reisinger was marked by a more cordial atmosphere, with the two parties finding common ground on several issues. While Meinl-Reisinger acknowledged the Greens’ successes in areas like climate protection and freedom of information, she emphasized the need for more comprehensive reforms and expressed dissatisfaction with the Greens’ approach to filling positions [[2]].
Kogler, on the other hand, highlighted the positive impact of the Greens’ participation in the government, citing their role in preventing a turquoise-blue coalition and achieving successes in areas like climate protection [[2]]. He remained calm about the possibility of losing the chance to participate in the government, stating that “we’ll have to wait and see.”
Meanwhile, Austria’s chancellor, Karl Nehammer, has reaffirmed his commitment to maintaining the current government coalition with the Green party, citing the need for stability and continuity in these uncertain times [[1]].
The ongoing debates and negotiations reflect the complexities of Austria’s political landscape, with multiple parties vying for influence and power. As the country navigates these uncertain times, it remains to be seen which parties will ultimately form the next government and what this will mean for the Austrian people.
References:
[[3]](https
Austrian Politics: Debate Highlights Differences and Similarities among Parties
A recent debate among Austrian politicians has highlighted the significant differences and similarities among the country’s parties. The debate, which took place ahead of the upcoming 2024 Austrian legislative election <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024Austrianlegislativeelection”>[1[1], saw leaders from various parties engaging in a heated discussion on key issues, including tax policies, inflation, and government reform.
Differences on Tax Issues
The debate kicked off with a confrontation between Social Democratic Party of Austria (SPÖ) leader Babler and Austrian People’s Party (ÖVP) leader Nehammer, who differed significantly on tax policies. While Babler emphasized the need for wealth taxes, Nehammer advocated for tax relief, labeling the wealth and inheritance taxes desired by the SPÖ leader as “pointless.” The two leaders also clashed on their approach to entrepreneurship and employment, with Babler accusing Nehammer of being out of touch with the 21st century.
“Incredible Aloofness”
The SPÖ leader, who has consistently criticized the coalition government for its handling of inflation, accused Nehammer of protecting the super-rich and demonstrating an “incredible aloofness” towards the financially weaker segments of society. Nehammer, however, defended his stance, citing his party’s focus on property rather than prefabricated buildings. Despite their differences, both leaders did not rule out the possibility of forming a coalition with each other in the future.
Kogler and Meinl-Reisinger Largely Agree
In contrast, the debate between Green Party spokesman Werner Kogler and NEOS chairwoman Beate Meinl-Reisinger was much more conciliatory, with the two leaders finding common ground on most issues. Meinl-Reisinger acknowledged the Greens’ achievements, such as the Freedom of Information Act and the climate ticket, and emphasized the need for a reform coalition that can tackle structural reforms. Kogler, meanwhile, highlighted the positive impact of the Greens’ participation in the government, including their efforts to prevent a turquoise-blue coalition.
Austria’s Political Landscape
The debate reflects the complexities of Austria’s political landscape, which has seen significant shifts in recent years. The 2023 Lower Austrian state election, for instance, saw the ÖVP emerge as the largest party, while the SPÖ suffered significant losses <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2023LowerAustrianstate_election”>[2[2]. Meanwhile, the Austrian People’s Party has maintained its lead in the polls, according to POLITICO’s poll of polls [3[3].
Conclusion
The debate highlights the divergent views of Austria’s political parties on key issues, as well as their areas of agreement. As the country prepares for the 2024 legislative election, these differences and similarities will likely play a significant role in shaping the country’s political future.
