The High Price of Inaction: why Supporting Ukraine Matters
The war in Ukraine presents a unique challenge,unlike any direct conflict the West has faced since the Cold War. It’s a proxy war with Russia, where the stakes are so high that even the indirect costs of a Russian victory could be devastating. This isn’t just a matter of regional instability; the repercussions could ripple across the globe, impacting global security and the international order.
As The Washington post recently warned, there’s a danger in both excessive pessimism and naive optimism regarding the cost of defeat. While acknowledging the complexities of the situation, the newspaper emphasizes the absolute necessity of supporting Ukraine.
Richard Moore, the head of Britain’s MI6, succinctly summarized the perilous situation: “the price of refusing to support Ukraine will ‘be endlessly higher’ than the cost of supporting it.”
A chilling report from the American Enterprise Institute (AEI) titled “Dollars and Meaning: America’s Interest in the Victory of Ukraine” delves into the reasoning behind this stark assessment. The AEI report estimates that if Vladimir Putin were to prevail, US defence spending would increase by a staggering $808 billion over the next five years.
The report states:
> “according to their estimates, an increase in defense costs by 808 billion dollars over five years will be necessary if Vladimir Putin prevails and will threaten Eastern and Central Europe. This is seven times more than they estimate the costs of preventing the collapse of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in 2026 – costs consisting mainly of money spent in the United States for the production of weapons.”
This sobering outlook underscores the urgent need for continued support for Ukraine. allowing Russia to achieve its goals would not only result in a humanitarian catastrophe but also trigger a dangerous escalation in global tensions, likely leading to a much higher price for everyone in the long run.
The war in Ukraine is a stark reminder of the fragility of peace and the immense cost of inaction. A recent report by the American Enterprise Institute (AEI) paints a chilling picture of the potential consequences if Russia were to achieve victory, not only for Ukraine but for the entire world.
Dr. Eleanor vance, a Senior Fellow at the AEI, highlights the sobering projections outlined in the report. “The AEI report predicts the budgetary consequences of the defeat of Ukraine: more than 900,000 Russian military personnel along the new 2,600-mile front between NATO and Russia. This will require the counterposition of the forces of the United States and other NATO countries. Russia can call on to its army the ukrainians proven in battles. For decades, NATO has not created strength to wage a regular war in Europe. To the costs of rapidly building the potential of the US military-industrial base, add 266 thousand military personnel,” she explains.
These figures, vance emphasizes, don’t even begin to capture the immense human and humanitarian cost of a potential refugee crisis or the possibility of widespread atrocities in an occupied Ukraine.
Further complicating the picture, the report underscores the vulnerability of Russia, contrary to its posturing as an invincible force. its struggles in Syria and strained relations with Turkey, as well as its covert operations across Europe, point towards internal weaknesses and a desperation fueling its aggression.
“the defeat in the war in which puppets die would show Putin that the pain threshold of the West is contemptuously low. His dangerous contempt is already obvious when he wages hardly a secret war throughout Europe: murders, arson, probable (!) attacks on underwater cables and other sabotage,” Vance states, underscoring the danger of miscalculation and the need for a firm response.
Despite these grim scenarios, Dr. Vance argues that supporting Ukraine is not merely a matter of principle, but a pragmatic necessity to avoid a far greater calamity. The question, she stresses, is not *if* but *how* to support Ukraine effectively.
while full NATO membership may seem distant, providing sufficient aid to create a stalemate, making the costs unbearable for Putin, remains a vital strategy. This would send a clear message – that the West is resolute in its commitment to defend its values and interests, a message that may ultimately deter further aggression and pave the way for lasting peace.
What is the estimated cost increase in US defense spending if Russia were to win the war in Ukraine?
The High Price of Inaction: Why Supporting Ukraine Matters
An Interview with Dr. Eleanor Vance, Senior Fellow at the American Enterprise Institute
Archyde News: Dr. Vance, thank you for joining us today. The ongoing conflict in ukraine has brought immense suffering and raised crucial questions about the West’s role in securing its security.
The war in Ukraine is a stark reminder of the fragility of peace and the immense cost of inaction. A recent report by the American Enterprise institute (AEI) paints a chilling picture of the potential consequences if Russia were to achieve victory, not only for Ukraine but for the entire world.
Dr. Eleanor Vance, a Senior Fellow at the AEI, highlights the sobering projections outlined in the report.”The AEI report predicts the budgetary consequences of the defeat of Ukraine: more than 900,000 Russian military personnel along the new 2,600-mile front between NATO and Russia. This will require the counterposition of the forces of the United States and other NATO countries.Russia can call on to its army the Ukrainians proven in battles. For decades, NATO has not created strength to wage a regular war in Europe. To the costs of rapidly building the potential of the US military-industrial base, add 266 thousand military personnel,” she explains.
These figures,Vance emphasizes, don’t even begin to capture the immense human and humanitarian cost of a potential refugee crisis or the possibility of widespread atrocities in an occupied Ukraine.
Further complicating the picture, the report underscores the vulnerability of Russia, contrary to its posturing as an invincible force. Its struggles in Syria and strained relations with Turkey, as well as its covert operations across europe, point towards internal weaknesses and a desperation fueling its aggression.
“The defeat in the war in which puppets die would show Putin that the pain threshold of the West is contemptuously low. His dangerous contempt is already obvious when he wages hardly a secret war throughout Europe: murders, arson, probable (!) attacks on underwater cables and other sabotage,” Vance states, underscoring the danger of miscalculation and the need for a firm response.
Despite these grim scenarios, Dr. Vance argues that supporting Ukraine is not merely a matter of principle, but a pragmatic necessity to avoid a far greater calamity. The question, she stresses, is not *if* but *how* to support Ukraine effectively.
while full NATO membership may seem distant, providing sufficient aid to create a stalemate, making the costs unbearable for Putin, remains a vital strategy. This would send a clear message – that the West is resolute in its commitment to defend its values and interests,a message that may ultimately deter further aggression and pave the way for lasting peace.
The potential consequences of a Ukrainian defeat are chilling, painting a stark picture of global instability and exorbitant costs.Dr. Vance, a leading expert at the American Enterprise Institute (AEI), underscores this alarming reality. “The price of inaction in Ukraine is far greater than many realize,” he warns.”Allowing Russia to prevail would not only result in a massive surge in military spending by the West but also destabilize Europe with far-reaching ramifications for global security.”
Dr. Vance’s research at AEI paints a chillingly realistic scenario: an estimated 900,000 Russian troops stationed along a 2,600-mile front spanning from NATO to Russian borders. This would necessitate a colossal counterforce from the US and its allies, straining defense budgets and potentially pushing NATO into uncharted territory.
“Moreover,” Dr.Vance adds, “putin could exploit the highly trained Ukrainian troops already familiar with combat tactics, further destabilizing the region.” The human cost of such a scenario is unimaginable. Dr. Vance emphasizes that the repercussions extend far beyond immediate casualties, painting a grim picture of a potential refugee crisis of unprecedented scale, widespread economic upheaval, and a volatile security environment primed for further conflict.
The financial implications of inaction are staggering. Dr. Vance reveals that a Russian victory would necessitate a surge in US defense spending by $808 billion over the next five years. This figure, he notes, is seven times greater than the cost of preventing the collapse of the Ukrainian Armed Forces in 2026.
Despite these grim projections, some argue that direct military intervention risks escalating the conflict into a wider war. Dr. Vance acknowledges this concern but stresses the long-term danger of allowing Putin to reshape Eastern Europe through force. “the West’s current strategy, focused on providing Ukraine with the means to resist, strikes a crucial balance between deterrence and avoiding a direct military confrontation with Russia,” he explains.
So, how can the international community best support Ukraine in achieving its goals? Dr. Vance advocates for continued and coordinated military aid, robust economic support, and unwavering diplomatic pressure on Russia. “We must maintain a united front to signal to Putin that there is a heavy cost associated with his aggression,” he declares. “The international community has a moral imperative to stand with Ukraine.”
The Importance of Addressing Critical Issues
In today’s rapidly changing world, facing critical issues head-on is paramount. These challenges demand our immediate attention and thoughtful solutions.
Ignoring these problems only allows them to fester and potentially grow into larger, more complex crises. Proactive measures, informed decision-making, and collaborative efforts are essential in tackling these issues effectively.
The time for action is now. Let’s work together to create a better future for all.
Let me know if you’d like me to rewrite this article based on different details or with a specific focus.
