CRNAs and anesthesiologists: A closer Look at Scope-of-Practice Debates
Table of Contents
- 1. CRNAs and anesthesiologists: A closer Look at Scope-of-Practice Debates
- 2. Study Finds No Link Between Expanded Nurse Anesthetist Scope and Improved rural Healthcare Access
- 3. HCA Florida ocala Hospital Feeds Needy Families Across Marion County
- 4. New Head and Neck Specialist Joins HCA Florida Memorial Hospital
- 5. New Faces in Jacksonville Healthcare: Dr. Smith Joins HCA florida Memorial and Amit Parmar Appointed COO at HCA Florida Woodmont
- 6. Rural Florida Faces Health Crisis as medicaid Cuts Loom
- 7. • How do proposed Medicaid cuts threaten the well-being of children in rural Florida?
- 8. Florida’s Healthcare Crossroads: A Conversation with Erica Li
- 9. The Importance of Medicaid in rural Florida
- 10. The Impact of Proposed Medicaid Cuts
- 11. Addressing Staffing Shortages
The debate over scope of practice for Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetists (CRNAs) and physician anesthesiologists is a recurring theme in healthcare policy. At the heart of the issue is the question of whether CRNAs, who are highly trained nurses specializing in anesthesia governance, should have greater autonomy in their practice.
Currently, Florida law mandates that CRNAs practice under the supervision of a physician anesthesiologist.This requirement, argued by some, limits access to anesthesia care, notably in rural areas where physician anesthesiologists may be scarce.CRNAs, represented by organizations like the Florida Association of Nurse Anesthetists (FANA), consistently advocate for changes in scope-of-practice laws, striving for increased autonomy and broader access to anesthesia services.
However, a recent study by Florida Atlantic University researchers challenges the claim that expanding CRNAs’ scope of practice through “opt-out” provisions necessarily improves access.
Lead author Dr.Scott Feyereisen analyzed hospital data from 2010 to 2021, finding no significant increase in anesthesia care access in states with these opt-out provisions. As Dr. Feyereisen’s research states, “We discovered that adopting opt-out provisions does not universally result in increased CRNA service provision in U.S. hospitals. Notably, opt-out provisions do not improve access in rural counties.”
While acknowledging the ongoing surgical access limitations in rural areas,the study suggests that “opt-out” provisions have failed to effectively address these shortages. This finding adds a layer of complexity to the ongoing debate, highlighting the need for nuanced solutions that go beyond simply expanding scope of practice.
Study Finds No Link Between Expanded Nurse Anesthetist Scope and Improved rural Healthcare Access
A recent study conducted by Florida Atlantic University researchers, funded by the Florida Society of Anesthesiologists, sheds light on the impact of expanded scope-of-practice provisions for Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetists (CRNAs) on healthcare access, particularly in rural areas. The findings, published in a peer-reviewed journal, challenge the notion that allowing crnas to practice independently improves access to anesthesia services, especially in underserved communities.
“We have long suspected — based on our direct field experiences — that when states dangerously expand the scope-of-practice for CRNAs, allowing them to perform anesthesia services without the supervision of a physician, areas with nurse shortages do not benefit. This detailed analysis by three respected FAU professors clearly bears this out,” stated Asha Padmanabhan, president of the Florida society of Anesthesiologists.
The study, wich analyzed extensive data, concluded that expanding CRNA scope-of-practice does not lead to increased nurse anesthetist presence in rural areas. padmanabhan emphasized the potential dangers associated with unsupervised anesthesia practice, stating, “not only is the practice of allowing nurses to independently practice anesthesia medicine without physician supervision costly and potentially dangerous, but this paper also demonstrates that it does not yield more nurses working in underserved areas.”
Padmanabhan underscored the study’s definitive findings, concluding, “the data unequivocally showed that taking the costly and potentially dangerous steps of expanding scope in anesthesia medicine does not improve access to care — especially in rural communities.”
Meanwhile, GuideWell, the parent company of Florida Blue, announced a 3% workforce reduction across 29 states. While the exact number of employees affected in Jacksonville remains undisclosed, the layoffs, first reported by the Jacksonville Business Journal, signal a belt-tightening measure amidst broader economic challenges.