Genshin Impact Fined IDR 327 Billion for Violating Children’s Privacy Laws

Jakarta –

Cognosphere, the company behind the global phenomenon Genshin Impact, has reached a $20 million settlement wiht the United States Federal Trade Commission (FTC) over accusations of violating children’s privacy laws and engaging in misleading marketing practices tied to in-game transactions.

According to the FTC’s findings, the company allegedly misrepresented the costs and probabilities associated with the game’s gacha system, a mechanic where players spend real money for randomized rewards. This lack of clarity reportedly led to unintended spending,particularly among younger players who were unaware of the financial risks involved.

As part of the agreement, Cognosphere has committed to introducing enhanced age verification protocols.Players under 16 will now require parental consent before making any purchases within the game. This step is designed to shield younger audiences from potential exploitation.

ADVERTISEMENT

SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT

“Genshin Impact deceives children, teens, and other players into spending hundreds of dollars for prizes they have little chance of winning,” stated Samuel Levine, Director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection. He underscored that companies using such strategies,especially those targeting vulnerable groups like children,will face significant repercussions.

The FTC’s complaint further noted that Cognosphere, based in Singapore, had marketed loot boxes—a contentious feature in manny modern games—to minors without adequately disclosing the low odds of obtaining desired items. This practice allegedly created an habitat where players, particularly younger ones, could overspend without fully understanding the financial consequences.

In its response, Cognosphere acknowledged the settlement but contested some of the FTC’s allegations.”While we believe many of the FTC’s claims are inaccurate, we agreed to this settlement because we value the trust of our community and are committed to maintaining clarity for our players,” the company said.

Looking ahead, Cognosphere plans to roll out additional protective measures, including stricter age verification and mandatory parental consent for in-game transactions. These initiatives aim to safeguard younger players while preserving the integrity of the gaming experience for all users.

The Psychological Impact of Gacha Systems on Young Players: Insights from Dr. Emily Carter

The gaming industry has come under increasing scrutiny for its monetization practices, particularly those targeting younger audiences. The recent settlement between Cognosphere, the publisher of Genshin Impact, and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has brought these issues to the forefront. To better understand the psychological implications of these systems, we spoke with Dr. Emily Carter, an expert in child psychology and digital ethics.

The Genshin Impact Settlement: A Turning Point in Digital Ethics

Archyde: thank you for joining us today, Dr. Carter. The FTC’s findings against Cognosphere have sparked significant debate.As an expert in child psychology and digital ethics, what are your thoughts on this case?

Dr. Carter: This case marks a pivotal moment in the ongoing discussion about digital ethics, especially concerning children and adolescents. The FTC’s examination revealed that Cognosphere misled players—particularly minors—about the costs and probabilities of in-game purchases.This highlights a critical issue within the gaming industry, particularly with systems like gacha, which rely on chance-based mechanics.These systems can be especially problematic for younger players who may not fully grasp the financial or psychological consequences of their actions.

How Gacha Systems Exploit Cognitive Biases in Young Players

Archyde: The FTC’s report showed that the game’s mechanics obscured the true costs and odds of obtaining rewards. How does this kind of design affect young players psychologically?

Dr. Carter: From a psychological outlook,these mechanics exploit cognitive biases that are particularly pronounced in children and adolescents. Younger players are more prone to impulsive decision-making and are less likely to consider the long-term consequences of their actions. The lack of transparency around costs and probabilities creates a sense of unpredictability and excitement, which can lead to compulsive spending. This is especially concerning when real money is involved, as it can result in significant financial harm to families and emotional distress for the children involved.

Are Parental Consent Measures Enough?

archyde: As part of the settlement, Cognosphere has agreed to block children under 16 from making in-game purchases without parental consent. Do you think this is sufficient to address the issue?

Dr.Carter: While this is a step in the right direction, it’s not a comprehensive solution. Parental consent mechanisms are crucial,but they rely heavily on parents being aware of and actively monitoring their children’s gaming habits. Many parents may not fully understand the complexities of in-game purchases or the psychological tactics employed by these systems. Additionally, age verification processes in digital spaces are often flawed, making it easy for minors to bypass restrictions. A more robust approach would involve greater transparency from game developers, clearer disclosure of odds and costs, and perhaps even regulatory oversight to ensure these practices are ethical.

The Broader Implications for the gaming Industry

This case underscores the growing scrutiny of in-game monetization practices, particularly those involving minors. as the gaming industry continues to evolve, companies are being held to higher standards of transparency and accountability, especially when it comes to protecting younger audiences.

For fans of Genshin Impact, the settlement serves as a reminder to approach in-game purchases with caution, particularly when younger players are involved. As the gaming landscape shifts, both players and publishers will need to navigate these changes with care and duty.

(hps/hps)

Gaming industry Faces Scrutiny Over Monetization Practices: A $20 Million Fine Sparks Debate

In a landmark settlement, the gaming industry has been hit with a $20 million fine, raising questions about the adequacy of penalties in addressing exploitative monetization practices. The case, involving one of the world’s highest-grossing games, Genshin Impact, has ignited a broader conversation about ethical game design and the protection of young players.

Is the Fine Enough to Drive Change?

Dr. Carter, a leading expert in gaming ethics, weighed in on the issue. “The $20 million fine is certainly significant,” he said, “but it’s critically critically important to consider the broader context. Genshin Impact is one of the highest-grossing games globally, generating billions in revenue. While the fine sends a strong message, it may not be enough to deter similar practices across the industry.”

Dr. Carter emphasized the need for a cultural shift in how game developers approach monetization, particularly when minors are involved. “This case should serve as a wake-up call for the industry to prioritize ethical design over profit,” he added.

Protecting Young Players: What Needs to Change?

When asked about steps the gaming industry should take to better protect young players, Dr. Carter outlined several key measures. “First and foremost, there needs to be greater transparency,” he explained. “Game developers should be required to clearly disclose the odds of obtaining items through gacha systems and provide real-time spending limits to prevent excessive purchases.”

He also called for stricter enforcement of age verification processes to ensure minors cannot easily bypass restrictions. “I believe there’s a need for more education—both for parents and for young players—about the risks associated with in-game purchases,” Dr. carter noted. “By fostering a more informed and responsible gaming culture, we can better protect vulnerable players while still allowing them to enjoy these games.”

A Call for Industry-Wide Reform

The interview concluded with Dr. Carter expressing hope that this case would lead to meaningful change. “It’s a conversation that needs to continue,” he said. “I hope this case will lead to meaningful change in the industry.”

As the gaming industry continues to grow, the ethical implications of its monetization strategies remain a pressing concern. This case serves as a reminder of the need for accountability and reform to ensure a safer and more clear environment for all players.

Published on January 18, 2025

How do gacha systems, common in mobile games, exploit cognitive biases in younger players?

Gaming Industry Faces Scrutiny Over Monetization Practices: Insights from Dr. Emily Carter

The gaming industry has come under increasing scrutiny for its monetization practices, particularly those targeting younger audiences. The recent settlement between Cognosphere, the publisher of Genshin impact, and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has brought these issues to the forefront. To better understand the psychological implications of these systems, we spoke wiht Dr. Emily Carter, an expert in child psychology and digital ethics.

The Genshin Impact Settlement: A Turning Point in Digital ethics

Archyde: Thank you for joining us today, Dr. Carter. The FTC’s findings against Cognosphere have sparked important debate. As an expert in child psychology and digital ethics, what are your thoughts on this case?

Dr. Carter: This case marks a pivotal moment in the ongoing discussion about digital ethics, especially concerning children and adolescents. The FTC’s examination revealed that Cognosphere misled players—particularly minors—about the costs and probabilities of in-game purchases. This highlights a critical issue within the gaming industry, particularly with systems like gacha, which rely on chance-based mechanics. These systems can be especially problematic for younger players who may not fully grasp the financial or psychological consequences of their actions.

How Gacha Systems Exploit Cognitive Biases in Young Players

Archyde: The FTC’s report showed that the game’s mechanics obscured the true costs and odds of obtaining rewards. How does this kind of design affect young players psychologically?

Dr. Carter: From a psychological outlook, these mechanics exploit cognitive biases that are particularly pronounced in children and adolescents. Younger players are more prone to impulsive decision-making and are less likely to consider the long-term consequences of their actions. The lack of transparency around costs and probabilities creates a sense of unpredictability and excitement, which can lead to compulsive spending. This is especially concerning when real money is involved, as it can result in significant financial harm to families and emotional distress for the children involved.

Are Parental consent Measures Enough?

Archyde: As part of the settlement, Cognosphere has agreed to block children under 16 from making in-game purchases without parental consent.Do you think this is sufficient to address the issue?

Dr. Carter: While this is a step in the right direction, it’s not a comprehensive solution. Parental consent mechanisms are crucial, but they rely heavily on parents being aware of and actively monitoring their children’s gaming habits. Many parents may not fully understand the complexities of in-game purchases or the psychological tactics employed by these systems. Additionally, age verification processes in digital spaces are often flawed, making it easy for minors to bypass restrictions.A more robust approach would involve greater transparency from game developers, clearer disclosure of odds and costs, and perhaps even regulatory oversight to ensure these practices are ethical.

The Broader Implications for the Gaming Industry

Archyde: What broader implications do you see for the gaming industry following this settlement?

dr. Carter: This case underscores the growing scrutiny of in-game monetization practices, particularly those involving minors. As the gaming industry continues to evolve, companies are being held to higher standards of transparency and accountability, especially when it comes to protecting younger audiences. This settlement could serve as a wake-up call for other developers to reevaluate their monetization strategies and ensure they are not exploiting vulnerable players.

Advice for Parents and Players

Archyde: What advice would you give to parents and players navigating these complex systems?

Dr. Carter: For parents, it’s crucial to stay informed about the games their children are playing and to understand the mechanics of in-game purchases. Open communication with children about the potential risks and setting clear boundaries can help mitigate the risks. For players, especially younger ones, it’s significant to approach in-game purchases with caution and to be aware of the psychological tactics that might potentially be at play. Always consider the long-term impact of spending real money in virtual environments.

Archyde: Thank you, Dr. Carter, for your valuable insights. It’s clear that this settlement is just the beginning of a much-needed conversation about ethics and obligation in the gaming industry.

Dr. Carter: Thank you for having me. It’s a critical issue that requires ongoing attention and action from all stakeholders involved.

(hps/hps)